Psychology assignment T7
12 Angry Men – Online/Tradonline (Objs. 7.1-7.3) - Rubric
Patterns of Persuasion, Conformity, Minority In�uence, and Other Social
In�uences 15 points
Criteria Description
Identify patterns of persuasion, conformity, minority influence, and other social
influences
5. Target 15 points
Worksheet expertly identifies patterns of persuasion, conformity, minority
influence, and other social influences. Worksheet demonstrates an exceptional
understanding of the topic.
4. Acceptable 12.75 points
Worksheet clearly identifies patterns of persuasion, conformity, minority influence,
and other social influences. Worksheet demonstrates an understanding that
extends beyond the surface of the topic.
3. Approaching 11.25 points
Worksheet adequately identifies patterns of persuasion, conformity, minority
influence, and other social influences. Worksheet demonstrates a basic
understanding of the topic.
2. Insufficient 9.75 points
Worksheet inadequately identifies patterns of persuasion, conformity, minority
influence, and other social influences. Worksheet demonstrates a poor
understanding of the topic.
1. Unsatisfactory 0 points
Worksheet omits or incompletely identifies patterns of persuasion, conformity,
minority influence, and other social influences. Worksheet does not demonstrate
understanding of the topic.
Collapse All
© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.
Stereotypes and Prejudice 15 points
Criteria Description
Describe and assess instances of stereotypes and prejudice, identifying cognitive
biases and attitudes in the film.
5. Target 15 points
Worksheet expertly describes and assesses instances of stereotypes and prejudice,
identifying cognitive biases and attitudes in the film. Worksheet demonstrates an
exceptional understanding of the topic.
4. Acceptable 12.75 points
Worksheet clearly describes and assesses instances of stereotypes and prejudice,
identifying cognitive biases and attitudes in the film. Worksheet demonstrates an
understanding that extends beyond the surface of the topic.
3. Approaching 11.25 points
Worksheet adequately describes and assesses instances of stereotypes and
prejudice, identifying cognitive biases and attitudes in the film. Worksheet
demonstrates a basic understanding of the topic.
2. Insufficient 9.75 points
Worksheet inadequately describes and assesses instances of stereotypes and
prejudice, identifying cognitive biases and attitudes in the film. Worksheet
demonstrates a poor understanding of the topic.
1. Unsatisfactory 0 points
Worksheet omits or incompletely describes and assesses instances of stereotypes
and prejudice, identifying cognitive biases and attitudes in the film. Worksheet does
not demonstrate understanding of the topic.
© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.
Zillman’s stages of escalation 20 points
Criteria Description
Identify the progression of Zillman’s stages of escalation and the provocation model.
5. Target 20 points
Worksheet expertly identifies the progression of Zillman’s stages of escalation and
the provocation model. Worksheet demonstrates an exceptional understanding of
the topic.
4. Acceptable 17 points
Worksheet clearly identifies the progression of Zillman’s stages of escalation and
the provocation model. Worksheet demonstrates an understanding that extends
beyond the surface of the topic.
3. Approaching 15 points
Worksheet adequately identifies the progression of Zillman’s stages of escalation
and the provocation model. Worksheet demonstrates a basic understanding of the
topic.
2. Insufficient 13 points
Worksheet incompletely identifies the progression of Zillman’s stages of escalation
and the provocation model. Worksheet demonstrates a poor understanding of the
topic.
1. Unsatisfactory 0 points
Worksheet omits or incompletely identifies the progression of Zillman’s stages of
escalation and the provocation model. Worksheet does not demonstrate
understanding of the topic.
© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.
Causes of aggression 15 points
Criteria Description
Describe and offer examples of biological causes of aggression, cultural causes of
aggression, and situational causes of aggression from the film.
5. Target 15 points
Worksheet expertly describes and offers examples of biological causes of
aggression, cultural causes of aggression, and situational causes of aggression from
the film. Worksheet demonstrates an exceptional understanding of the topic.
4. Acceptable 12.75 points
Worksheet clearly describes and offers examples of biological causes of aggression,
cultural causes of aggression, and situational causes of aggression from the film.
Worksheet demonstrates an understanding that extends beyond the surface of the
topic.
3. Approaching 11.25 points
Worksheet adequately describes and offers examples of biological causes of
aggression, cultural causes of aggression, and situational causes of aggression from
the film. Worksheet demonstrates a basic understanding of the topic.
2. Insufficient 9.75 points
Worksheet inadequately describes and offers examples of biological causes of
aggression, cultural causes of aggression, and situational causes of aggression from
the film. Worksheet demonstrates a poor understanding of the topic.
1. Unsatisfactory 0 points
Worksheet omits or incompletely describes and offers examples of biological
causes of aggression, cultural causes of aggression, and situational causes of
aggression from the film. Worksheet does not demonstrate understanding of the
topic.
© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.
Groupthink and Group Polarization 15 points
Criteria Description
Define and provide examples of group think and group polarization from the film
5. Target 15 points
Worksheet expertly defines and provides examples of group think and group
polarization from the film. Worksheet demonstrates an exceptional understanding
of the topic.
4. Acceptable 12.75 points
Worksheet clearly defines and provides examples of group think and group
polarization from the film. Worksheet demonstrates an understanding that extends
beyond the surface of the topic.
3. Approaching 11.25 points
Worksheet adequately defines and provides examples of group think and group
polarization from the film. Worksheet demonstrates a basic understanding of the
topic.
2. Insufficient 9.75 points
Worksheet inadequately defines and provides examples of group think and group
polarization from the film. Worksheet demonstrates a poor understanding of the
topic.
1. Unsatisfactory 0 points
Worksheet omits or incompletely defines and provides examples of group think and
group polarization from the film. Worksheet does not demonstrate understanding
of the topic.
© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.
Evidence 10 points
Criteria Description
Selects and integrates evidence to support and advance position/purposes; considers
other perspectives.
5. Target 10 points
Specific and appropriate evidence is included. Relevant perspectives of others are
clearly considered.
4. Acceptable 8.5 points
Relevant evidence that includes other perspectives is used.
3. Approaching 7.5 points
Evidence is used but is insufficient or of limited relevance. Simplistic explanation or
integration of other perspectives is present.
2. Insufficient 6.5 points
Evidence is limited or irrelevant. The interpretation of other perspectives is
superficial or incorrect.
1. Unsatisfactory 0 points
Evidence to support the thesis, position, or purpose is absent. The writing relies
entirely on the perspective of the writer.
© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.
Mechanics of Writing 5 points
Criteria Description
Includes spelling, capitalization, punctuation, grammar, language use, sentence
structure, etc.
5. Target 5 points
No mechanical errors are present. Skilled control of language choice and sentence
structure are used throughout.
4. Acceptable 4.25 points
Few mechanical errors are present. Suitable language choice and sentence
structure are used.
3. Approaching 3.75 points
Occasional mechanical errors are present. Language choice is generally
appropriate. Varied sentence structure is attempted.
2. Insufficient 3.25 points
Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors are present. Inconsistencies in language
choice or sentence structure are recurrent.
1. Unsatisfactory 0 points
Errors in grammar or syntax are pervasive and impede meaning. Incorrect language
choice or sentence structure errors are found throughout.
© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.
Format/Documentation 5 points
Criteria Description
Uses appropriate style, such as APA, MLA, etc., for college, subject, and level;
documents sources using citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc.,
appropriate to assignment and discipline.
5. Target 5 points
No errors in formatting or documentation are present. Selectivity in the use of
direct quotations and synthesis of sources is demonstrated.
4. Acceptable 4.25 points
Appropriate format and documentation are used with only minor errors.
3. Approaching 3.75 points
Appropriate format and documentation are used, although there are some obvious
errors.
2. Insufficient 3.25 points
Appropriate format is attempted, but some elements are missing. Frequent errors
in documentation of sources are evident.
1. Unsatisfactory 0 points
Appropriate format is not used. No documentation of sources is provided.
Total 100 points
© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.