Psychology assignment T7

profileRosi_226
PSY-362Rubric-12AngryMenOnline_TradonlineObjs.7.1-7.3.pdf

12 Angry Men – Online/Tradonline (Objs. 7.1-7.3) - Rubric

Patterns of Persuasion, Conformity, Minority In�uence, and Other Social

In�uences 15 points

Criteria Description

Identify patterns of persuasion, conformity, minority influence, and other social

influences

5. Target 15 points

Worksheet expertly identifies patterns of persuasion, conformity, minority

influence, and other social influences. Worksheet demonstrates an exceptional

understanding of the topic.

4. Acceptable 12.75 points

Worksheet clearly identifies patterns of persuasion, conformity, minority influence,

and other social influences. Worksheet demonstrates an understanding that

extends beyond the surface of the topic.

3. Approaching 11.25 points

Worksheet adequately identifies patterns of persuasion, conformity, minority

influence, and other social influences. Worksheet demonstrates a basic

understanding of the topic.

2. Insufficient 9.75 points

Worksheet inadequately identifies patterns of persuasion, conformity, minority

influence, and other social influences. Worksheet demonstrates a poor

understanding of the topic.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

Worksheet omits or incompletely identifies patterns of persuasion, conformity,

minority influence, and other social influences. Worksheet does not demonstrate

understanding of the topic.

Collapse All

© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.

Stereotypes and Prejudice 15 points

Criteria Description

Describe and assess instances of stereotypes and prejudice, identifying cognitive

biases and attitudes in the film.

5. Target 15 points

Worksheet expertly describes and assesses instances of stereotypes and prejudice,

identifying cognitive biases and attitudes in the film. Worksheet demonstrates an

exceptional understanding of the topic.

4. Acceptable 12.75 points

Worksheet clearly describes and assesses instances of stereotypes and prejudice,

identifying cognitive biases and attitudes in the film. Worksheet demonstrates an

understanding that extends beyond the surface of the topic.

3. Approaching 11.25 points

Worksheet adequately describes and assesses instances of stereotypes and

prejudice, identifying cognitive biases and attitudes in the film. Worksheet

demonstrates a basic understanding of the topic.

2. Insufficient 9.75 points

Worksheet inadequately describes and assesses instances of stereotypes and

prejudice, identifying cognitive biases and attitudes in the film. Worksheet

demonstrates a poor understanding of the topic.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

Worksheet omits or incompletely describes and assesses instances of stereotypes

and prejudice, identifying cognitive biases and attitudes in the film. Worksheet does

not demonstrate understanding of the topic.

© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.

Zillman’s stages of escalation 20 points

Criteria Description

Identify the progression of Zillman’s stages of escalation and the provocation model.

5. Target 20 points

Worksheet expertly identifies the progression of Zillman’s stages of escalation and

the provocation model. Worksheet demonstrates an exceptional understanding of

the topic.

4. Acceptable 17 points

Worksheet clearly identifies the progression of Zillman’s stages of escalation and

the provocation model. Worksheet demonstrates an understanding that extends

beyond the surface of the topic.

3. Approaching 15 points

Worksheet adequately identifies the progression of Zillman’s stages of escalation

and the provocation model. Worksheet demonstrates a basic understanding of the

topic.

2. Insufficient 13 points

Worksheet incompletely identifies the progression of Zillman’s stages of escalation

and the provocation model. Worksheet demonstrates a poor understanding of the

topic.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

Worksheet omits or incompletely identifies the progression of Zillman’s stages of

escalation and the provocation model. Worksheet does not demonstrate

understanding of the topic.

© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.

Causes of aggression 15 points

Criteria Description

Describe and offer examples of biological causes of aggression, cultural causes of

aggression, and situational causes of aggression from the film.

5. Target 15 points

Worksheet expertly describes and offers examples of biological causes of

aggression, cultural causes of aggression, and situational causes of aggression from

the film. Worksheet demonstrates an exceptional understanding of the topic.

4. Acceptable 12.75 points

Worksheet clearly describes and offers examples of biological causes of aggression,

cultural causes of aggression, and situational causes of aggression from the film.

Worksheet demonstrates an understanding that extends beyond the surface of the

topic.

3. Approaching 11.25 points

Worksheet adequately describes and offers examples of biological causes of

aggression, cultural causes of aggression, and situational causes of aggression from

the film. Worksheet demonstrates a basic understanding of the topic.

2. Insufficient 9.75 points

Worksheet inadequately describes and offers examples of biological causes of

aggression, cultural causes of aggression, and situational causes of aggression from

the film. Worksheet demonstrates a poor understanding of the topic.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

Worksheet omits or incompletely describes and offers examples of biological

causes of aggression, cultural causes of aggression, and situational causes of

aggression from the film. Worksheet does not demonstrate understanding of the

topic.

© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.

Groupthink and Group Polarization 15 points

Criteria Description

Define and provide examples of group think and group polarization from the film

5. Target 15 points

Worksheet expertly defines and provides examples of group think and group

polarization from the film. Worksheet demonstrates an exceptional understanding

of the topic.

4. Acceptable 12.75 points

Worksheet clearly defines and provides examples of group think and group

polarization from the film. Worksheet demonstrates an understanding that extends

beyond the surface of the topic.

3. Approaching 11.25 points

Worksheet adequately defines and provides examples of group think and group

polarization from the film. Worksheet demonstrates a basic understanding of the

topic.

2. Insufficient 9.75 points

Worksheet inadequately defines and provides examples of group think and group

polarization from the film. Worksheet demonstrates a poor understanding of the

topic.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

Worksheet omits or incompletely defines and provides examples of group think and

group polarization from the film. Worksheet does not demonstrate understanding

of the topic.

© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.

Evidence 10 points

Criteria Description

Selects and integrates evidence to support and advance position/purposes; considers

other perspectives.

5. Target 10 points

Specific and appropriate evidence is included. Relevant perspectives of others are

clearly considered.

4. Acceptable 8.5 points

Relevant evidence that includes other perspectives is used.

3. Approaching 7.5 points

Evidence is used but is insufficient or of limited relevance. Simplistic explanation or

integration of other perspectives is present.

2. Insufficient 6.5 points

Evidence is limited or irrelevant. The interpretation of other perspectives is

superficial or incorrect.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

Evidence to support the thesis, position, or purpose is absent. The writing relies

entirely on the perspective of the writer.

© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.

Mechanics of Writing 5 points

Criteria Description

Includes spelling, capitalization, punctuation, grammar, language use, sentence

structure, etc.

5. Target 5 points

No mechanical errors are present. Skilled control of language choice and sentence

structure are used throughout.

4. Acceptable 4.25 points

Few mechanical errors are present. Suitable language choice and sentence

structure are used.

3. Approaching 3.75 points

Occasional mechanical errors are present. Language choice is generally

appropriate. Varied sentence structure is attempted.

2. Insufficient 3.25 points

Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors are present. Inconsistencies in language

choice or sentence structure are recurrent.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

Errors in grammar or syntax are pervasive and impede meaning. Incorrect language

choice or sentence structure errors are found throughout.

© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.

Format/Documentation 5 points

Criteria Description

Uses appropriate style, such as APA, MLA, etc., for college, subject, and level;

documents sources using citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc.,

appropriate to assignment and discipline.

5. Target 5 points

No errors in formatting or documentation are present. Selectivity in the use of

direct quotations and synthesis of sources is demonstrated.

4. Acceptable 4.25 points

Appropriate format and documentation are used with only minor errors.

3. Approaching 3.75 points

Appropriate format and documentation are used, although there are some obvious

errors.

2. Insufficient 3.25 points

Appropriate format is attempted, but some elements are missing. Frequent errors

in documentation of sources are evident.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

Appropriate format is not used. No documentation of sources is provided.

Total 100 points

© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.