Psychology Assignment Topic 4
Successful Career and Retirement Plan - Rubric
Key Career Factors 10 points
Criteria Description
Discuss key factors in considering a career.
5. Target 10 points
Discussion of key factors in career consideration is thorough and makes
connections to current research.
4. Acceptable 8.5 points
Discussion of key factors in career consideration is present and makes some
connection to research.
3. Approaching 7.5 points
Discussion of key factors in career consideration is present and appropriate.
2. Insufficient 6.5 points
Discussion of key factors in career consideration is vague or inconsistent.
1. Unsatisfactory 0 points
Discussion of key factors in career consideration is missing.
Collapse All
© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.
Description of Retirement 40 points
Criteria Description
Describe retirement, including what is appealing about it, what age you would like to
retire, your biggest concerns about retirement, and what steps you will take to ensure
a successful retirement.
5. Target 40 points
Description of retirement, including what is appealing about it, what age student
would like to retire, their biggest concerns about retirement, and what steps
student will take to ensure a successful retirement, is clear and concise; makes
connections to current research.
4. Acceptable 34 points
Description of retirement, including what is appealing about it, what age student
would like to retire, their biggest concerns about retirement, and what steps
student will take to ensure a successful retirement, is present and makes some
connections to research.
3. Approaching 30 points
Description of retirement, including what is appealing about it, what age student
would like to retire, their biggest concerns about retirement, and what steps
student will take to ensure a successful retirement, is present and appropriate.
2. Insufficient 26 points
Description of retirement, including what is appealing about it, what age student
would like to retire, his or her biggest concerns about retirement, and what steps
student will take to ensure a successful retirement, is vague or inconsistent.
1. Unsatisfactory 0 points
Description of retirement, including what is appealing about it, what age student
would like to retire, their biggest concerns about retirement, and what steps
student will take to ensure a successful retirement, is missing.
© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.
Life Post Retirement 20 points
Criteria Description
Explain how you will structure your life post-retirement, including how you will
maintain your identity, how you will maintain your physical activity, how you will
challenge your mind, and how you plan to connect with others.
5. Target 20 points
Explanation on how student will structure their life post-retirement, including how
they will maintain their identity, how they will maintain their physical activity, how
they will challenge their mind, and how they plan to connect with others, is
thorough and makes connections to current research.
4. Acceptable 17 points
Explanation on how student will structure their life post-retirement, including how
they will maintain their identity, how they will maintain their physical activity, how
they will challenge their mind, and how they plan to connect with others, is present
and makes some connections to research.
3. Approaching 15 points
Explanation on how student will structure their life post-retirement, including how
they will maintain their identity, how they will maintain their physical activity, how
they will challenge their mind, and how they plan to connect with others, is present
and appropriate.
2. Insufficient 13 points
Explanation on how student will structure their life post-retirement, including how
they will maintain their identity, how they will maintain their physical activity, how
they will challenge their mind, and how they plan to connect with others, is vague or
inconsistent.
1. Unsatisfactory 0 points
Explanation on how the student will structure their life post-retirement, including
how they will maintain their identity, how they will maintain their physical activity,
how they will challenge their mind, and how they plan to connect with others, is
missing.
© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.
Thesis, Position, or Purpose 7 points
Criteria Description
Communicates reason for writing and demonstrates awareness of audience.
5. Target 7 points
The thesis, position, or purpose is persuasively developed throughout and skillfully
directed to a specific audience.
4. Acceptable 5.95 points
The thesis, position, or purpose is clearly communicated throughout and clearly
directed to a specific audience.
3. Approaching 5.25 points
The thesis, position, or purpose is adequately developed. An awareness of the
appropriate audience is demonstrated.
2. Insufficient 4.55 points
The thesis, position, or purpose is discernable in most aspects but is occasionally
weak or unclear. There is limited awareness of the appropriate audience.
1. Unsatisfactory 0 points
The thesis, position, or purpose is not discernible. No awareness of the appropriate
audience is evident.
© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.
Development, Structure, and Conclusion 8 points
Criteria Description
Advances position or purpose throughout writing; conclusion aligns to and evolves
from development.
5. Target 8 points
The thesis, position, or purpose is coherently and cohesively advanced throughout.
The progression of ideas is coherent and unified. A convincing and unambiguous
conclusion aligns to the development of the purpose.
4. Acceptable 6.8 points
The thesis, position, or purpose is logically advanced throughout. The progression
of ideas is coherent and unified. A clear and plausible conclusion aligns to the
development of the purpose.
3. Approaching 6 points
The thesis, position, or purpose is advanced in most aspects. Ideas clearly build on
each other. Conclusion aligns to the development of the purpose.
2. Insufficient 5.2 points
Limited advancement of thesis, position, or purpose is discernable. There are
inconsistencies in organization or the relationship of ideas. Conclusion is simplistic
and not fully aligned to the development of the purpose.
1. Unsatisfactory 0 points
No advancement of the thesis, position, or purpose is evident. Connections
between paragraphs are missing or inappropriate. No conclusion is offered.
© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.
Evidence 5 points
Criteria Description
Selects and integrates evidence to support and advance position/purpose; considers
other perspectives.
5. Target 5 points
Comprehensive and compelling evidence is included. Multiple other perspectives
are integrated effectively.
4. Acceptable 4.25 points
Specific and appropriate evidence is included. Other perspectives are integrated.
3. Approaching 3.75 points
Relevant evidence that includes other perspectives is used.
2. Insufficient 3.25 points
Evidence is used but is insufficient or of limited relevance. Simplistic explanation or
integration of other perspectives is present.
1. Unsatisfactory 0 points
Evidence to support the thesis, position, or purpose is absent. The writing relies
entirely on the perspective of the writer.
© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.
Mechanics of Writing 5 points
Criteria Description
Includes spelling, capitalization, punctuation, grammar, language use, sentence
structure, etc.
5. Target 5 points
No mechanical errors are present. Skilled control of language choice and sentence
structure are used throughout.
4. Acceptable 4.25 points
Few mechanical errors are present. Suitable language choice and sentence
structure are used.
3. Approaching 3.75 points
Occasional mechanical errors are present. Language choice is generally
appropriate. Varied sentence structure is attempted.
2. Insufficient 3.25 points
Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors are present. Inconsistencies in language
choice or sentence structure are recurrent.
1. Unsatisfactory 0 points
Errors in grammar or syntax are pervasive and impede meaning. Incorrect language
choice or sentence structure errors are found throughout.
© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.
Format/Documentation 5 points
Criteria Description
Uses appropriate style, such as APA, MLA, etc., for college, subject, and level;
documents sources using citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc.,
appropriate to assignment and discipline.
5. Target 5 points
No errors in formatting or documentation are present. Selectivity in the use of
direct quotations and synthesis of sources is demonstrated.
4. Acceptable 4.25 points
Appropriate format and documentation are used with only minor errors.
3. Approaching 3.75 points
Appropriate format and documentation are used, although there are some obvious
errors.
2. Insufficient 3.25 points
Appropriate format is attempted, but some elements are missing. Frequent errors
in documentation of sources are evident.
1. Unsatisfactory 0 points
Appropriate format is not used. No documentation of sources is provided.
Total 100 points
© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.