Psychology Topic 8 Assignment

Rosi_226

PSY-358Rubric-GrievingAgeandTypeofDeath.pdf

Home >Psychology homework help >Psychology Topic 8 Assignment

Grieving Age and Type of Death - Rubric

Grief 22.5 points

Criteria Description

Discuss the meaning of grief and typical grief responses for the selected type of grief,

including discussing if there is a specific timeline for grief.

5. Target 22.5 points

Essay expertly describes the meaning of grief and typical grief responses for the

selected type of grief, including discussing if there is a specific timeline for grief, and

the discussion is comprehensive and insightful with relevant evidence to support

claims.

4. Acceptable 19.13 points

Essay clearly describes the meaning of grief and typical grief responses for the

selected type of grief, including discussing if there is a specific timeline for grief, and

the discussion is strong with sound analysis and some evidence to support claims.

3. Approaching 16.88 points

Essay adequately describes the meaning of grief and typical grief responses for the

selected type of grief, including discussing if there is a specific timeline for grief, but

the discussion is limited and lacks some evidence to support claims.

2. Insufficient 14.63 points

Essay inadequately describes the meaning of grief and typical grief responses for

the selected type of grief, including discussing if there is a specific timeline for grief,

but the discussion is weak and missing evidence to support claims.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

Essay omits or incompletely discusses the meaning of grief and typical grief

responses for the selected type of grief, including discussing if there is a specific

timeline for grief.

Collapse All

© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.

https://www.gce.com/

Culture or Religion 13.5 points

Criteria Description

Describes a different culture or religion's view of death, mourning rituals, and the

impact these may have on the grief process and bereavement period. If the selected

culture or religion is non-Christian, describe how it differs from or is similar to

Christianity's view of death. If it is Christian, describe how it relates to biblical teachings

on death and the afterlife. Note any aspects that may potentially impact bereavement

5. Target 13.5 points

Essay expertly describes another culture's or religion's view of death, including

mourning rituals, and the impact it may have on the grief process and bereavement

period, and the comparison is comprehensive and insightful with relevant evidence

to support claims.

4. Acceptable 11.48 points

Essay clearly describes another culture's or religion's view of death, including

mourning rituals, and the impact it may have on the grief process and bereavement

period, and the comparison is strong with sound analysis and some evidence to

support claims.

3. Approaching 10.13 points

Essay adequately describes another culture's or religion's view of death, including

mourning rituals, and the impact it may have on the grief process and bereavement

period, but the comparison is limited and lacks some evidence to support claims.

2. Insufficient 8.78 points

Essay inadequately describes another culture's or religion's view of death, including

mourning rituals, and the impact it may have on the grief process and bereavement

period, but the comparison is weak and missing evidence to support claims.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

Essay omits or incompletely describes another culture's or religion's view of death,

including mourning rituals, and the impact it may have on the grief process and

bereavement period.

https://www.gce.com/

Factors 18 points

Criteria Description

Discuss factors that might complicate bereavement, include associated symptoms and

protective factors for navigating through loss.

5. Target 18 points

Essay clearly discusses factors that might complicate bereavement, include

associated symptoms and protective factors for navigating through loss, and the

discussion is strong with sound analysis and some evidence to support claims.

4. Acceptable 15.3 points

Essay clearly discusses factors that might complicate bereavement, include

associated symptoms and protective factors for navigating through loss, and the

discussion is strong with sound analysis and some evidence to support claims.

3. Approaching 13.5 points

Essay adequately discusses factors that might complicate bereavement, include

associated symptoms and protective factors for navigating through loss, but the

discussion is limited and lacks some evidence to support claims.

2. Insufficient 11.7 points

Essay inadequately discusses factors that might complicate bereavement, include

associated symptoms and protective factors for navigating through loss, but the

discussion is weak and missing evidence to support claims.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

Essay omits or incompletely discusses factors that might complicate bereavement,

include associated symptoms and protective factors for navigating through loss.

https://www.gce.com/

Re�ection 9 points

Criteria Description

Reflect on your own grief responses and coping strategies, including how effective it

has been and factors you might utilize in the future.

5. Target 9 points

Essay reflection expertly reflects of the student's grief responses and coping

strategies, including how effective the grief process has been and factors that may

be used in the future, and the reflection is comprehensive and insightful with

relevant evidence to support claims.

4. Acceptable 7.65 points

Essay reflection clearly reflects of the student's grief responses and coping

strategies, including how effective the grief process has been and factors that may

be used in the future, and the reflection is strong with sound analysis and some

evidence to support claims.

3. Approaching 6.75 points

Essay reflection adequately reflects on the student's grief responses and coping

strategies, including how effective the grief process has been and factors that may

be used in the future, but the reflection is limited and lacks some evidence to

support claims.

2. Insufficient 5.85 points

Essay reflection inadequately reflects on the student's grief responses and coping

strategies, including how effective the grief process has been and factors that may

be used in the future, but the reflection is weak and missing evidence to support

claims.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

Essay reflection omits or incompletely reflects on the student's grief responses and

coping strategies, including how effective the grief process has been and factors

that may be used in the future.

https://www.gce.com/

Thesis, Position, or Purpose 6.3 points

Criteria Description

Communicates reason for writing and demonstrates awareness of audience.

5. Target 6.3 points

The thesis, position, or purpose is clearly communicated throughout and clearly

directed to a specific audience.

4. Acceptable 5.35 points

The thesis, position, or purpose is adequately presented. An awareness of the

appropriate audience is demonstrated.

3. Approaching 4.73 points

The thesis, position, or purpose is discernable in most aspects but is occasionally

weak or unclear. There is limited awareness of the appropriate audience.

2. Insufficient 4.1 points

The thesis, position, or purpose is unfocused or confused. There is very little

awareness of the intended audience.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

The thesis, position, or purpose is not discernible. No awareness of the appropriate

audience is evident.

https://www.gce.com/

Development, Structure, and Conclusion 6.3 points

Criteria Description

Advances position or purpose throughout writing; conclusion aligns to and evolves

from development.

5. Target 6.3 points

The thesis, position, or purpose is logically advanced throughout. The progression

of ideas is coherent and unified. A clear and logical conclusion aligns to the

development of the purpose.

4. Acceptable 5.35 points

The thesis, position, or purpose is advanced in most aspects. Ideas clearly build on

each other. Conclusion aligns to the development of the purpose.

3. Approaching 4.73 points

Limited advancement of thesis, position, or purpose is discernable. There are

inconsistencies in organization or the relationship of ideas. Conclusion is simplistic

and not fully aligned to the development of the purpose.

2. Insufficient 4.1 points

Writing lacks logical progression of the thesis, position, or purpose. Some

organization is attempted, but ideas are disconnected. Conclusion is unclear and

not supported by the overall development of the purpose.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

No advancement of the thesis, position, or purpose is evident. Connections

between paragraphs are missing or inappropriate. No conclusion is offered.

https://www.gce.com/

Evidence 5.4 points

Criteria Description

Selects and integrates evidence to support and advance position/purpose; considers

other perspectives.

5. Target 5.4 points

Specific and appropriate evidence is included. Relevant perspectives of others are

clearly considered.

4. Acceptable 4.59 points

Relevant evidence that includes other perspectives is used.

3. Approaching 4.05 points

Evidence is used but is insufficient or of limited relevance. Simplistic explanation or

integration of other perspectives is present.

2. Insufficient 3.51 points

Evidence is limited or irrelevant. The interpretation of other perspectives is

superficial or incorrect.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

Evidence to support the thesis, position, or purpose is absent. The writing relies

entirely on the perspective of the writer.

https://www.gce.com/

Mechanics of Writing 5.4 points

Criteria Description

Includes spelling, capitalization, punctuation, grammar, language use, sentence

structure, etc.

5. Target 5.4 points

No mechanical errors are present. Appropriate language choice and sentence

structure are used throughout.

4. Acceptable 4.59 points

Few mechanical errors are present. Suitable language choice and sentence

structure are used.

3. Approaching 4.05 points

Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors are present. Inconsistencies in language

choice or sentence structure are recurrent.

2. Insufficient 3.51 points

Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors are present. Inconsistencies in language

choice or sentence structure are recurrent.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

Errors in grammar or syntax are pervasive and impede meaning. Incorrect language

choice or sentence structure errors are found throughout.

https://www.gce.com/

Format/Documentation 3.6 points

Criteria Description

Uses appropriate style, such as APA, MLA, etc., for college, subject, and level;

documents sources using citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc.,

appropriate to assignment and discipline.

5. Target 3.6 points

No errors in formatting or documentation are present.

4. Acceptable 3.06 points

Appropriate format and documentation are used with only minor errors.

3. Approaching 2.7 points

Appropriate format and documentation are used, although there are some obvious

errors.

2. Insufficient 2.34 points

Appropriate format is attempted, but some elements are missing. Frequent errors

in documentation of sources are evident.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

Appropriate format is not used. No documentation of sources is provided.

Total 90 points

https://www.gce.com/