Psychology Topic 1 Assignment

Rosi_226

PSY-358Rubric-DevelopmentForcesandSuccessfulAgingSurveyandResearch.pdf

Home >Psychology homework help >Psychology Topic 1 Assignment

Development Forces and Successful Aging Survey and Research - Rubric

Biopsychosocial Forces 6 points

Criteria Description

Define all four biopsychosocial forces and include an example of each.

5. Target 6 points

The definitions and examples for all four biopsychosocial forces are academic and

include citations. Accurate examples are included for each force and each example

is comprehensive and insightful with relevant evidence to support claims.

4. Acceptable 5.1 points

The definitions for all four biopsychosocial forces are thorough. The examples for

each force are accurate. Each example is strong with sound analysis and some

evidence to support claims.

3. Approaching 4.5 points

The definitions for all four biopsychosocial forces are limited. The examples for

each force are adequate. Lacks evidence to support claims.

2. Insufficient 3.9 points

The definitions for all four biopsychosocial forces are inadequate. The examples for

each force are general and the evidence to support the examples is missing or

insufficient.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

The definitions and examples for all four biopsychosocial forces are missing from

the worksheet.

Collapse All

© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.

https://www.gce.com/

Interviewee Responses 18 points

Criteria Description

Provide a thorough summary of each of the interviewee's responses in each age

category. Include major forces that shaped each individual.

5. Target 18 points

The interview response summaries in each age category are exceptional. Each of

the summaries are comprehensive and insightful with relevant evidence to support

claims. The major forces that shaped each individual are thoughtfully woven into

the summary.

4. Acceptable 15.3 points

The interview response summaries in each age category are advanced. Each of the

summaries are strong with sound analysis and some evidence to support claims.

The major forces that shaped each individual are seamlessly woven into the

summary.

3. Approaching 13.5 points

The interview response summaries in each age category are limited, but adequate.

The major forces that shaped each individual are included appropriately.

2. Insufficient 11.7 points

The interview response summaries in each age category are vague. The major

forces that shaped each individual are missing, or insufficient.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

The interview response summaries in each age category are missing.

https://www.gce.com/

Connection with Research 15 points

Criteria Description

Paper included a clear connection between interviewee's responses and current,

academic literature for both parts. A minimum of three scholarly sources were

included.

5. Target 15 points

The interview response summaries demonstrate an exceptional understanding of

how to make a clear connection between the interviewee's responses and current,

academic literature. At least three scholarly sources were used and were

thoughtfully integrated into the summaries.

4. Acceptable 12.75 points

The interview response summaries demonstrate an understanding that extends

beyond the surface level of how to make a clear connection between the

interviewee's responses and current, academic literature. At least three scholarly

sources were used and seamlessly integrated into the summaries.

3. Approaching 11.25 points

The interview response summaries demonstrate a basic understanding of how to

make a clear connection between the interviewee's responses and current,

academic literature. At least three scholarly sources were used.

2. Insufficient 9.75 points

The interview response summaries demonstrate a poor understanding of how to

make a clear connection between the interviewee's responses and current,

academic literature. Less than three scholarly sources were used.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

The interview response summaries do not include a connection between the

interviewee's responses and current, academic literature.

https://www.gce.com/

Successful Aging 15 points

Criteria Description

Summarized interviewee's opinions regarding successful aging, commonalities, age

factors, and other unique factors.

5. Target 15 points

Interview response summaries expertly describe the interviewee's opinions

regarding successful aging, commonalities, age factors, and other unique factors.

Each of the summarizations of the interviewee's opinions is comprehensive and

insightful with relevant evidence to support claims.

4. Acceptable 12.75 points

Interview response summaries clearly describe the interviewee's opinions regarding

successful aging, commonalities, age factors, and other unique factors. Each of the

summarizations of the interviewee's opinions is strong with sound analysis and

some evidence to support claims.

3. Approaching 11.25 points

Interview response summaries adequately describe the interviewee's opinions

regarding successful aging, commonalities, age factors, and other unique factors.

Each of the summarizations of the interviewee's opinions lack evidence to support

claims.

2. Insufficient 9.75 points

Interview response summaries inadequately describe the interviewee's opinions

regarding successful aging, commonalities, age factors, and other unique factors.

The summarization of the interviewee's opinions is weak and missing evidence to

support claims.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

Interview response summaries omit or incompletely describes the interviewee's

opinions regarding successful aging, commonalities, age factors, and other unique

factors.

https://www.gce.com/

Mechanics of Writing 3 points

Criteria Description

Includes spelling, capitalization, punctuation, grammar, language use, sentence

structure, etc.

5. Target 3 points

No mechanical errors are present. Appropriate language choice and sentence

structure are used throughout.

4. Acceptable 2.55 points

Few mechanical errors are present. Suitable language choice and sentence

structure are used.

3. Approaching 2.25 points

Occasional mechanical errors are present. Language choice is generally

appropriate. Varied sentence structure is attempted.

2. Insufficient 1.95 points

Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors are present. Inconsistencies in language

choice or sentence structure are recurrent.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

Errors in grammar or syntax are pervasive and impede meaning. Incorrect language

choice or sentence structure errors are found throughout.

https://www.gce.com/

Format/Documentation 3 points

Criteria Description

Uses appropriate style, such as APA, for college, subject, and level; documents sources

using citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., appropriate to assignment

and discipline.

5. Target 3 points

No errors in formatting or documentation are present.

4. Acceptable 2.55 points

Appropriate format and documentation are used with only minor errors.

3. Approaching 2.25 points

Appropriate format and documentation are used, although there are some obvious

errors.

2. Insufficient 1.95 points

Appropriate format is attempted, but some elements are missing. Frequent errors

in documentation of sources are evident.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

Appropriate format is not used. No documentation of sources is provided.

Total 60 points

https://www.gce.com/