Psychology Topic 2 Assignment

Rosi_226

PSY-358Rubric-CaringforMemoryLossPatientsPresentation.pdf

Home >Psychology homework help >Psychology Topic 2 Assignment

Caring for Memory Loss Patients Presentation - Rubric

Changes to the Brain 15 points

Criteria Description

Provide an overview of a minimum of three general age-related cognitive changes.

5. Target 15 points

Presentation provides a comprehensive inclusion of a minimum of three general

age-related cognitive changes.

4. Acceptable 12.75 points

Presentation provides an advanced inclusion of a minimum of three general age-

related cognitive changes.

3. Approaching 11.25 points

Presentation fully includes an overview of a minimum of three general age-related

cognitive changes.

2. Insufficient 9.75 points

Presentation vaguely includes an overview of a minimum of three general age-

related cognitive changes.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

Presentation does not include an overview of a minimum of three general age-

related cognitive changes.

Collapse All

© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.

https://www.gce.com/

Treatments and Interventions 20 points

Criteria Description

Describe at least three evidence-based treatments and interventions.

5. Target 20 points

Presentation includes a comprehensive description of three or more evidence-

based treatments and interventions and is masterfully linked to the overview.

4. Acceptable 17 points

Presentation includes a thorough description of three or more evidence-based

treatments and interventions.

3. Approaching 15 points

Presentation adequately includes a description of at least three evidence-based

treatments and interventions.

2. Insufficient 13 points

Presentation vaguely includes a description of at least three evidence-based

treatments and interventions.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

Presentation does not include a description of at least three evidence-based

treatments and interventions.

https://www.gce.com/

Challenges 20 points

Criteria Description

Address challenges faced by caregivers.

5. Target 20 points

Presentation addresses the challenges faced by caregivers. The summary

masterfully integrates the overview, the treatments, and the interventions.

4. Acceptable 17 points

Presentation addresses the challenges faced by caregivers. The summary is

advanced.

3. Approaching 15 points

Presentation addresses the challenges faced by caregivers. The summary is

appropriate.

2. Insufficient 13 points

Presentation addresses the challenges faced by caregivers, but the summary is

minimal.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

Presentation addresses the challenges faced by caregivers, but the summary is

poorly developed.

https://www.gce.com/

Resources 10 points

Criteria Description

List and describe 4-6 supportive community resources for patients and caregivers.

5. Target 10 points

Presentation includes a list of supportive community resources for patients and

caregivers that is exceptionally thorough and professional.

4. Acceptable 8.5 points

Presentation includes a list of supportive community resources for patients and

caregivers that is advanced and meaningful.

3. Approaching 7.5 points

Presentation includes a list of supportive community resources for patients and

caregivers that is logical and sufficient.

2. Insufficient 6.5 points

Presentation includes a list of community resources for the patients and caregiver.

It is unclear who the resources are meant to support.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

Presentation omits a list of community resources for the patients and caregiver.

https://www.gce.com/

Presentation of Content 10 points

Criteria Description

Presentation of Content

5. Target 10 points

The content is written clearly and concisely. Ideas universally progress and relate to

each other. The project includes motivating questions and advanced organizers.

The project gives the audience a clear sense of the main idea.

4. Acceptable 8.5 points

The content is written with a logical progression of ideas and supporting

information exhibiting a unity, coherence, and cohesiveness. Includes persuasive

information from reliable sources.

3. Approaching 7.5 points

The presentation slides are generally competent, but ideas may show some

inconsistency in organization and/or in their relationships to each other.

2. Insufficient 6.5 points

The content is vague in conveying a point of view and does not create a strong

sense of purpose. Includes some persuasive information.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

The content lacks a clear point of view and logical sequence of information. Includes

little persuasive information. Sequencing of ideas is unclear.

https://www.gce.com/

Layout 5 points

Criteria Description

Layout

5. Target 5 points

The layout is visually pleasing and contributes to the overall message with

appropriate use of headings, subheadings, and white space. Text is appropriate in

length for the target audience and to the point. The background and colors enhance

the readability of the text.

4. Acceptable 4.25 points

The layout background and text complement each other and enable the content to

be easily read. The fonts are easy to read and point size varies appropriately for

headings and text.

3. Approaching 3.75 points

The layout uses horizontal and vertical white space appropriately. Sometimes the

fonts are easy to read, but in a few places the use of fonts, italics, bold, long

paragraphs, color, or busy background detracts and does not enhance readability.

2. Insufficient 3.25 points

The layout shows some structure but appears cluttered and busy or distracting with

large gaps of white space or a distracting background. Overall readability is difficult

due to lengthy paragraphs, too many different fonts, dark or busy background,

overuse of bold, or lack of appropriate indentations of text.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

The layout is cluttered, confusing, and does not use spacing, headings, and

subheadings to enhance the readability. The text is extremely difficult to read with

long blocks of text, small point size for fonts, and inappropriate contrasting colors.

Poor use of headings, subheadings, indentations, or bold formatting is evident.

https://www.gce.com/

Mechanics of Writing 10 points

Criteria Description

Includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use.

5. Target 10 points

Writer is clearly in control of standard, written, academic English.

4. Acceptable 8.5 points

Slides are largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present.

3. Approaching 7.5 points

Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to

the reader.

2. Insufficient 6.5 points

Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

Slide errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning.

https://www.gce.com/

Documentation of Sources 10 points

Criteria Description

Includes citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to

assignment and style.

5. Target 10 points

Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment

and style, and format is free of error.

4. Acceptable 8.5 points

Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is

mostly correct.

3. Approaching 7.5 points

Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some

formatting errors may be present.

2. Insufficient 6.5 points

Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to

assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

Sources are not documented.

Total 100 points

https://www.gce.com/