Topic 6 Assessment

profileRosi_226
PSY-352Rubric-SubstanceUseandtheBiopsychosocialModel.pdf

Substance Use and the Biopsychosocial Model - Rubric

Explain Why Someone Uses the Chosen Substance 8.25 points

Criteria Description

Brochure/Pamphlet explains why someone would use the chosen substance, based on

the biopsychosocial model.

5. Target 8.25 points

Brochure/Pamphlet expertly describes explains why someone would use the

chosen substance, based on the Biopsychosoical Model, and description is

comprehensive and insightful. Brochure/Pamphlet demonstrates an exceptional

understanding of the topic.

4. Acceptable 7.01 points

Brochure/Pamphlet clearly explains why someone would use the chosen substance,

based on the Biopsychosoical Model, and description is strong. Brochure/Pamphlet

demonstrates an understanding that extends beyond the surface of the topic.

3. Approaching 6.19 points

Brochure/Pamphlet adequately explains why someone would use the chosen

substance, based on the Biopsychosoical Model, but description is limited.

Brochure/Pamphlet demonstrates a basic understanding of the topic.

2. Insufficient 5.36 points

Brochure/Pamphlet inadequately explains why someone would use the chosen

substance, based on the Biopsychosoical Model, but description is weak.

Brochure/Pamphlet demonstrates a poor understanding of the topic.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

Brochure/Pamphlet omits or incompletely explains why someone would use the

chosen substance, based on the Biopsychosoical Model. Brochure/Pamphlet does

not demonstrate understanding of the topic.

Collapse All

© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.

Address How Media In�uences Substance Use 8.25 points

Criteria Description

Brochure/Pamphlet describes how media influences substance use.

5. Target 8.25 points

Brochure/Pamphlet expertly describes how media influences substance use, and

description is comprehensive and insightful. Brochure/Pamphlet demonstrates an

exceptional understanding of the topic.

4. Acceptable 7.01 points

Brochure/Pamphlet clearly describes how media influences substance use, and

description is strong. Brochure/Pamphlet demonstrates an understanding that

extends beyond the surface of the topic.

3. Approaching 6.19 points

Brochure/Pamphlet adequately describes how media influences substance use, but

description is limited. Brochure/Pamphlet demonstrates a basic understanding of

the topic.

2. Insufficient 5.36 points

Brochure/Pamphlet inadequately describes how media influences substance use,

but description is weak. Brochure/Pamphlet demonstrates a poor understanding of

the topic.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

Brochure/Pamphlet omits or incompletely describes how media influences

substance use. Brochure/Pamphlet does not demonstrate understanding of the

topic.

© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.

Discuss the Health Risks, Rami�cations, and/or Bene�ts Associated With

the Substance 11 points

Criteria Description

Brochure/Pamphlet discusses the health risks, ramifications and/or benefits associated

with the chosen substance.

5. Target 11 points

Brochure/Pamphlet expertly discusses the health risks, ramifications and/or

benefits associated with the chosen substance, and description is comprehensive

and insightful. Brochure/Pamphlet demonstrates an exceptional understanding of

the topic.

4. Acceptable 9.35 points

Brochure/Pamphlet clearly discusses the health risks, ramifications and/or benefits

associated with the chosen substance, and description is strong.

Brochure/Pamphlet demonstrates an understanding that extends beyond the

surface of the topic.

3. Approaching 8.25 points

Brochure/Pamphlet adequately discusses the health risks, ramifications and/or

benefits associated with the chosen substance, but description is limited.

Brochure/Pamphlet demonstrates a basic understanding of the topic.

2. Insufficient 7.15 points

Brochure/Pamphlet inadequately discusses the health risks, ramifications and/or

benefits associated with the chosen substance, but description is weak.

Brochure/Pamphlet demonstrates a poor understanding of the topic.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

Brochure/Pamphlet omits or incompletely discusses the health risks, ramifications

and/or benefits associated with the chosen substance. Brochure/Pamphlet does not

demonstrate understanding of the topic.

© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.

Identify Treatments/Techniques Used to Treat Addiction Associated With

the Substance 11 points

Criteria Description

Brochure/Pamphlet describes treatments/techniques used to treat addiction

associated with the substance, including an explanation of how these

treatments/techniques are implemented.

5. Target 11 points

Brochure/Pamphlet expertly describes treatments/techniques used to treat

addiction associated with the substance, including an explanation of how these

treatments/techniques are implemented, and description is comprehensive and

insightful. Brochure/Pamphlet demonstrates an exceptional understanding of the

topic.

4. Acceptable 9.35 points

Brochure/Pamphlet clearly describes treatments/techniques used to treat addiction

associated with the substance, including an explanation of how these

treatments/techniques are implemented, and description is strong.

Brochure/Pamphlet demonstrates an understanding that extends beyond the

surface of the topic.

3. Approaching 8.25 points

Brochure/Pamphlet adequately describes treatments/techniques used to treat

addiction associated with the substance, including an explanation of how these

treatments/techniques are implemented, but description is limited.

Brochure/Pamphlet demonstrates a basic understanding of the topic.

2. Insufficient 7.15 points

Brochure/Pamphlet inadequately describes treatments/techniques used to treat

addiction associated with the substance, including an explanation of how these

treatments/techniques are implemented, but description is weak.

Brochure/Pamphlet demonstrates a poor understanding of the topic.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

Brochure/Pamphlet omits or incompletely describes treatments/techniques used to

treat addiction associated with the substance, including an explanation of how

these treatments/techniques are implemented. Brochure/Pamphlet does not

demonstrate understanding of the topic.

© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.

Visual Appeal 5.5 points

Criteria Description

Visual Appeal

5. Target 5.5 points

Appropriate and thematic graphic elements are used to make visual connections

that contribute to the understanding of concepts, ideas, and relationships.

Differences in type size or color are used well and consistently.

4. Acceptable 4.68 points

Thematic graphic elements are used but not always in context. Visual connections

mostly contribute to the understanding of concepts, ideas, and relationships.

Differences in type size or color are used well and consistently.

3. Approaching 4.13 points

Minimal use of graphic elements is evident. Elements do not consistently contribute

to the understanding of concepts, ideas, and relationships. There is some variation

in type size, color, and layout.

2. Insufficient 3.58 points

Color is garish and/or typographic variations are overused and legibility suffers.

Background interferes with readability. Understanding of concepts, ideas, and

relationships is limited.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

There are few or no graphic elements. No variation in layout or typography is

evident.

© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.

Presentation 5.5 points

Criteria Description

Presentation

5. Target 5.5 points

The submission is presented effectively, and all of the required elements creatively

contribute to the presentation of the concepts.

4. Acceptable 4.68 points

The submission is presented effectively and contains all of the required elements.

3. Approaching 4.13 points

The submission contains minor inconsistencies that are not overly distracting.

Presentation contains a majority of the required elements.

2. Insufficient 3.58 points

The submission is ineffective, contains multiple inconsistencies, or is missing a few

of the required elements.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

The submission is incoherent, contains major inconsistencies, is not presented

effectively, or is missing a substantial amount of the required elements.

© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.

Mechanics of Writing 2.75 points

Criteria Description

Includes spelling, capitalization, punctuation, grammar, language use, sentence

structure, etc.

5. Target 2.75 points

No mechanical errors are present. Appropriate language choice and sentence

structure are used throughout.

4. Acceptable 2.34 points

Few mechanical errors are present. Suitable language choice and sentence

structure are used.

3. Approaching 2.06 points

Occasional mechanical errors are present. Language choice is generally

appropriate. Varied sentence structure is attempted.

2. Insufficient 1.79 points

Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors are present. Inconsistencies in language

choice or sentence structure are recurrent.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

Errors in grammar or syntax are pervasive and impede meaning. Incorrect language

choice or sentence structure errors are found throughout.

© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.

Format/Documentation 2.75 points

Criteria Description

Uses appropriate style, such as APA, MLA, etc., for college, subject, and level;

documents sources using citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc.,

appropriate to assignment and discipline.

5. Target 2.75 points

No errors in formatting or documentation are present.

4. Acceptable 2.34 points

Appropriate format and documentation are used with only minor errors.

3. Approaching 2.06 points

Appropriate format and documentation are used, although there are some obvious

errors.

2. Insufficient 1.79 points

Appropriate format is attempted, but some elements are missing. Frequent errors

in documentation of sources are evident.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

Appropriate format is not used. No documentation of sources is provided.

Total 55 points

© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.