Psychology Topic 8 Assignment

profileRosi_226
PSY-352Rubric-HealthPsychologyEmploymentOpportunities.pdf

Health Psychology Employment Opportunities - Rubric

Explain the Health Psychology Job/Employment Opportunity 16 points

Criteria Description

Chosen medium explains the health psychology job/employment opportunity.

5. Target 16 points

Chosen modality expertly explains the health psychology job/employment

opportunity, and description is comprehensive and insightful. Chosen modality

demonstrates an exceptional understanding of the topic.

4. Acceptable 13.6 points

Chosen modality clearly explains the health psychology job/employment

opportunity, and description is strong. Chosen modality demonstrates an

understanding that extends beyond the surface of the topic.

3. Approaching 12 points

Chosen modality adequately explains the health psychology job/employment

opportunity, but description is limited. Chosen modality demonstrates a basic

understanding of the topic.

2. Insufficient 10.4 points

Chosen modality inadequately explains the health psychology job/employment

opportunity, but description is weak. Chosen modality demonstrates a poor

understanding of the topic.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

Chosen modality omits or incompletely explains the health psychology

job/employment opportunity. Chosen modality does not demonstrate

understanding of the topic.

Collapse All

© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.

Describe the Type of Degree or Education Required for Someone to Hold

the Position 16 points

Criteria Description

Chosen medium describes the type of degree or education required for someone to

hold the position, including any higher education licensure, or certification.

5. Target 16 points

Chosen modality expertly describes the type of degree or education required for

someone to hold the position, including any higher education licensure, or

certification, and description is comprehensive and insightful. Chosen modality

demonstrates an exceptional understanding of the topic.

4. Acceptable 13.6 points

Chosen modality clearly describes the type of degree or education required for

someone to hold the position, including any higher education licensure, or

certification, and description is strong. Chosen modality demonstrates an

understanding that extends beyond the surface of the topic.

3. Approaching 12 points

Chosen modality adequately describes the type of degree or education required for

someone to hold the position, including any higher education licensure, or

certification, but description is limited. Chosen modality demonstrates a basic

understanding of the topic.

2. Insufficient 10.4 points

Chosen modality inadequately describes the type of degree or education required

for someone to hold the position, including any higher education licensure, or

certification, but description is weak. Chosen modality demonstrates a poor

understanding of the topic.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

Chosen modality omits or incompletely describes the type of degree or education

required for someone to hold the position, including any higher education

licensure, or certification. Chosen modality does not demonstrate understanding of

the topic.

© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.

Describe the Responsibilities of the Job/Position 16 points

Criteria Description

Chosen medium describes the responsibilities of the job/position, including any

minimum requirements, work experience, and alternative or work around.

5. Target 16 points

Chosen modality expertly describes the responsibilities of the job/position,

including any minimum requirements, work experience, and alternative or work

around, and description is comprehensive and insightful. Chosen modality

demonstrates an exceptional understanding of the topic.

4. Acceptable 13.6 points

Chosen modality clearly describes the responsibilities of the job/position, including

any minimum requirements, work experience, and alternative or work around, and

description is strong. Chosen modality demonstrates an understanding that

extends beyond the surface of the topic.

3. Approaching 12 points

Chosen modality adequately describes the responsibilities of the job/position,

including any minimum requirements, work experience, and alternative or work

around, but description is limited. Chosen modality demonstrates a basic

understanding of the topic.

2. Insufficient 10.4 points

Chosen modality inadequately describes the responsibilities of the job/position,

including any minimum requirements, work experience, and alternative or work

around, but description is weak. Chosen modality demonstrates a poor

understanding of the topic.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

Chosen modality omits or incompletely describes the responsibilities of the

job/position, including any minimum requirements, work experience, and

alternative or work around. Chosen modality does not demonstrate understanding

of the topic.

© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.

Describe How the Biopsychosocial Model Aligns With the Job/Position 16 points

Criteria Description

Chosen medium describes how the biopsychosocial model aligns with the job/position,

including what components of the model might be involved.

5. Target 16 points

Chosen modality expertly describes how the biopsychosocial model aligns with the

job/position, incuding what components of the model might be involved, and

description is comprehensive and insightful. Chosen modality demonstrates an

exceptional understanding of the topic.

4. Acceptable 13.6 points

Chosen modality clearly describes how the biopsychosocial model aligns with the

job/position, incuding what components of the model might be involved, and

description is strong. Chosen modality demonstrates an understanding that

extends beyond the surface of the topic.

3. Approaching 12 points

Chosen modality adequately describes how the biopsychosocial model aligns with

the job/position, incuding what components of the model might be involved, but

description is limited. Chosen modality demonstrates a basic understanding of the

topic.

2. Insufficient 10.4 points

Chosen modality inadequately describes how the biopsychosocial model aligns with

the job/position, incuding what components of the model might be involved, but

description is weak. Chosen modality demonstrates a poor understanding of the

topic.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

Chosen modality omits or incompletely describes how the biopsychosocial model

aligns with the job/position, incuding what components of the model might be

involved. Chosen modality does not demonstrate understanding of the topic.

© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.

Describe the Earning Potential (Salary) for the Job/Position, Including

Student Considerations 16 points

Criteria Description

Chosen medium describes the earning potential (salary) for the job/position, including

whether the student would consider the job/position in the future.

5. Target 16 points

Chosen modality expertly describes the earning potential (salary) for the

job/position, including whether the student would consider the job/position in the

future, and description is comprehensive and insightful. Chosen modality

demonstrates an exceptional understanding of the topic.

4. Acceptable 13.6 points

Chosen modality clearly describes the earning potential (salary) for the job/position,

including whether the student would consider the job/position in the future, and

description is strong. Chosen modality demonstrates an understanding that

extends beyond the surface of the topic.

3. Approaching 12 points

Chosen modality adequately describes the earning potential (salary) for the

job/position, including whether the student would consider the job/position in the

future, but description is limited. Chosen modality demonstrates a basic

understanding of the topic.

2. Insufficient 10.4 points

Chosen modality inadequately describes the earning potential (salary) for the

job/position, including whether the student would consider the job/position in the

future, but description is weak. Chosen modality demonstrates a poor

understanding of the topic.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

Chosen modality omits or incompletely describes the earning potential (salary) for

the job/position, including whether the student would consider the job/position in

the future. Chosen modality does not demonstrate understanding of the topic.

© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.

Describe Any Interesting and Surprising Information Learned During

Research 16 points

Criteria Description

Chosen medium describes any interesting and surprising information learned during

the research process of the job/position.

5. Target 16 points

Chosen modality expertly describes any interesting and surprising information

learned during the research process of the job/position, and description is

comprehensive and insightful. Chosen modality demonstrates an exceptional

understanding of the topic.

4. Acceptable 13.6 points

Chosen modality clearly describes any interesting and surprising information

learned during the research process of the job/position, and description is strong.

Chosen modality demonstrates an understanding that extends beyond the surface

of the topic.

3. Approaching 12 points

Chosen modality adequately describes any interesting and surprising information

learned during the research process of the job/position, but description is limited.

Chosen modality demonstrates a basic understanding of the topic.

2. Insufficient 10.4 points

Chosen modality inadequately describes any interesting and surprising information

learned during the research process of the job/position, but description is weak.

Chosen modality demonstrates a poor understanding of the topic.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

Chosen modality omits or incompletely describes any interesting and surprising

information learned during the research process of the job/position. Chosen

modality does not demonstrate understanding of the topic.

© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.

Describe the Direction or Trends Identi�ed as a Result of the Research 16 points

Criteria Description

Chosen medium describes the direction or trends identified as a result of the research.

5. Target 16 points

Chosen modality expertly describes the specific direction or trends identified as a

result of the research, and description is comprehensive and insightful. Chosen

modality demonstrates an exceptional understanding of the topic.

4. Acceptable 13.6 points

Chosen modality clearly describes the specific direction or trends identified as a

result of the research, and description is strong. Chosen modality demonstrates an

understanding that extends beyond the surface of the topic.

3. Approaching 12 points

Chosen modality adequately describes the specific direction or trends identified as

a result of the research, but description is limited. Chosen modality demonstrates a

basic understanding of the topic.

2. Insufficient 10.4 points

Chosen modality inadequately describes the specific direction or trends identified

as a result of the research, but description is weak. Chosen modality demonstrates

a poor understanding of the topic.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

Chosen modality omits or incompletely describes the specific direction or trends

identified as a result of the research. Chosen modality does not demonstrate

understanding of the topic.

© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.

Visual Appeal 16 points

Criteria Description

Visual Appeal

5. Target 16 points

Appropriate and thematic graphic elements are used to make visual connections

that contribute to the understanding of concepts, ideas, and relationships.

Differences in type size or color are used well and consistently.

4. Acceptable 13.6 points

Thematic graphic elements are used but not always in context. Visual connections

mostly contribute to the understanding of concepts, ideas, and relationships.

Differences in type size or color are used well and consistently.

3. Approaching 12 points

Minimal use of graphic elements is evident. Elements do not consistently contribute

to the understanding of concepts, ideas, and relationships. There is some variation

in type size, color, and layout.

2. Insufficient 10.4 points

Color is garish and/or typographic variations are overused and legibility suffers.

Background interferes with readability. Understanding of concepts, ideas, and

relationships is limited.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

There are few or no graphic elements. No variation in layout or typography is

evident.

© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.

Presentation 16 points

Criteria Description

Presentation

5. Target 16 points

The submission is presented effectively and all of the required elements creatively

contribute to the presentation of the concepts.

4. Acceptable 13.6 points

The submission is presented effectively and contains all of the required elements.

3. Approaching 12 points

The submission contains minor inconsistencies that are not overly distracting.

Presentation contains a majority of the required elements.

2. Insufficient 10.4 points

The submission is ineffective, contains multiple inconsistencies, or is missing a few

of the required elements.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

The submission is incoherent, contains major inconsistencies, is not presented

effectively, or is missing a substantial amount of the required elements.

© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.

Mechanics of Writing 8 points

Criteria Description

Includes spelling, capitalization, punctuation, grammar, language use, sentence

structure, etc.

5. Target 8 points

No mechanical errors are present. Appropriate language choice and sentence

structure are used throughout.

4. Acceptable 6.8 points

Few mechanical errors are present. Suitable language choice and sentence

structure are used.

3. Approaching 6 points

Occasional mechanical errors are present. Language choice is generally

appropriate. Varied sentence structure is attempted.

2. Insufficient 5.2 points

Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors are present. Inconsistencies in language

choice or sentence structure are recurrent.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

Errors in grammar or syntax are pervasive and impede meaning. Incorrect language

choice or sentence structure errors are found throughout.

© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.

Format/Documentation 8 points

Criteria Description

Uses appropriate style, such as APA, MLA, etc., for college, subject, and level;

documents sources using citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc.,

appropriate to assignment and discipline.

5. Target 8 points

No errors in formatting or documentation are present.

4. Acceptable 6.8 points

Appropriate format and documentation are used with only minor errors.

3. Approaching 6 points

Appropriate format and documentation are used, although there are some obvious

errors.

2. Insufficient 5.2 points

Appropriate format is attempted, but some elements are missing. Frequent errors

in documentation of sources are evident.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

Appropriate format is not used. No documentation of sources is provided.

Total 160 points

© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.