Topic 7 assessment
Eating Disorder Risks and Treatment Options - Rubric
Choose One Eating Disorder 2.75 points
Criteria Description
Paper describes the precursors, signs, and symptoms of the eating disorder a family
doctor, friend or family member would notice if an individual has developed the
chosen eating disorder.
5. Target 2.75 points
The poster expertly discusses the influence of the chosen eating disorder on
identity development, self-presentation, and self-esteem. The poster demonstrates
an exceptional understanding of the topic.
4. Acceptable 2.34 points
The poster clearly discusses the influence of the chosen eating disorder on identity
development, self-presentation, and self-esteem The poster demonstrates an
understanding that extends beyond the surface of the topic.
3. Approaching 2.06 points
The poster adequately discusses the influence of the chosen eating disorder on
identity development, self-presentation, and self-esteem. The poster demonstrates
a basic understanding of the topic.
2. Insufficient 1.79 points
The poster inadequately discusses the influence of the chosen eating disorder on
identity development, self-presentation, and self-esteem. The poster demonstrates
a poor understanding of the topic.
1. Unsatisfactory 0 points
The poster omits or incompletely discusses the influence of the chosen eating
disorder on identity development, self-presentation, and self-esteem. The poster
does not demonstrate understanding of the topic.
Collapse All
© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.
Precursors, Signs, and Symptoms 11 points
Criteria Description
Highlight the key precursors, signs, and symptoms that individuals with this eating
disorder may exhibit. Use engaging visuals or icons to represent these symptoms,
making it easy to grasp the information at a glance.
5. Target 11 points
The poster expertly highlights the key precursors, signs, and symptoms that
individuals with this eating disorder may exhibit. The poster demonstrates an
exceptional understanding of the topic.
4. Acceptable 9.35 points
The poster clearly highlights the key precursors, signs, and symptoms that
individuals with this eating disorder may exhibit. The poster demonstrates an
understanding that extends beyond the surface of the topic.
3. Approaching 8.25 points
The poster adequately highlights the key precursors, signs, and symptoms that
individuals with this eating disorder may exhibit. The poster demonstrates a basic
understanding of the topic.
2. Insufficient 7.15 points
The poster inadequately highlights the key precursors, signs, and symptoms that
individuals with this eating disorder may exhibit. The poster demonstrates a poor
understanding of the topic.
1. Unsatisfactory 0 points
The poster omits or incompletely highlights the key precursors, signs, and
symptoms that individuals with this eating disorder may exhibit. The poster does
not demonstrate understanding of the topic.
© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.
Biopsychosocial Model Framework 11 points
Criteria Description
Explore the biopsychosocial model as the framework for understanding eating
disorders. Mention the biological, psychological, and social factors that contribute to
the development of the chosen eating disorder.
5. Target 11 points
The poster expertly explores the biopsychosocial model as the framework for
understanding eating disorders. Mentions the biological, psychological, and social
factors that contribute to the development of the chosen eating disorder. The
poster demonstrates an exceptional understanding of the topic.
4. Acceptable 9.35 points
The poster clearly explores the biopsychosocial model as the framework for
understanding eating disorders. Mentions the biological, psychological, and social
factors that contribute to the development of the chosen eating disorder. The
poster demonstrates an understanding that extends beyond the surface of the
topic.
3. Approaching 8.25 points
The poster adequately explores the biopsychosocial model as the framework for
understanding eating disorders. Mentions the biological, psychological, and social
factors that contribute to the development of the chosen eating disorder. The
poster demonstrates a basic understanding of the topic.
2. Insufficient 7.15 points
The poster inadequately explores the biopsychosocial model as the framework for
understanding eating disorders. Mentions the biological, psychological, and social
factors that contribute to the development of the chosen eating disorder. The
poster demonstrates a poor understanding of the topic.
1. Unsatisfactory 0 points
The poster omits or incompletely explores the biopsychosocial model as the
framework for understanding eating disorders. Mentions the biological,
psychological, and social factors that contribute to the development of the chosen
eating disorder. The poster does not demonstrate understanding of the topic.
© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.
Treatment Options 11 points
Criteria Description
Describe a concise list of treatment options that can be effective in managing the
chosen eating disorder. Include a brief description of each treatment.
5. Target 11 points
The poster expertly describes a concise list of treatment options that can be
effective in managing the chosen eating disorder. Include a brief description of each
treatment.
4. Acceptable 9.35 points
The poster clearly describes a concise list of treatment options that can be effective
in managing the chosen eating disorder. Include a brief description of each
treatment. The poster demonstrates an understanding that extends beyond the
surface of the topic.
3. Approaching 8.25 points
The poster adequately describes a concise list of treatment options that can be
effective in managing the chosen eating disorder. Include a brief description of each
treatment. The poster demonstrates a basic understanding of the topic.
2. Insufficient 7.15 points
The poster inadequately describes a concise list of treatment options that can be
effective in managing the chosen eating disorder. Include a brief description of each
treatment. The poster demonstrates a poor understanding of the topic.
1. Unsatisfactory 0 points
The poster omits or incompletely describes a concise list of treatment options that
can be effective in managing the chosen eating disorder. Include a brief description
of each treatment. The poster does not demonstrate understanding of the topic.
© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.
Visual Appeal 8.25 points
Criteria Description
Communicates reason for writing and demonstrates awareness of audience.
5. Target 8.25 points
Appropriate and thematic graphic elements are used to make visual connections
that contribute to the understanding of concepts, ideas, and relationships.
Differences in type size or color are used well and consistently. Elements commonly
found in social media websites/apps are present, attractive, used creatively, and
consistently contribute to an expert understanding of concepts, ideas, and
relationships.
4. Acceptable 7.01 points
Thematic graphic elements are used but not always in context. Visual connections
mostly contribute to the understanding of concepts, ideas, and relationships.
Differences in type size or color are used well and consistently. Elements commonly
found in social media websites/apps are present, show some creativity, and
consistently contribute to the understanding of concepts, ideas, and relationships.
3. Approaching 6.19 points
Minimal use of graphic elements is evident. Elements do not consistently contribute
to the understanding of concepts, ideas, and relationships. There is some variation
in type size, color, and layout. Elements commonly found in social media
websites/apps are present but do not consistently contribute to the understanding
of concepts, ideas, and relationships.
2. Insufficient 5.36 points
Color is garish and/or typographic variations are overused and legibility suffers.
Background interferes with readability. Understanding of concepts, ideas, and
relationships is limited. Elements commonly found in social media websites/apps
are limited and/or used unclearly.re is very little awareness of the intended
audience.
1. Unsatisfactory 0 points
There are few or no graphic elements. No variation in layout or typography is
evident. Elements commonly found in social media websites/apps are missing.
© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.
Presentation 5.5 points
Criteria Description
Advances position or purpose throughout writing; conclusion aligns to and evolves
from development.
5. Target 5.5 points
The poster is presented effectively and all of the required elements creatively
contribute to the presentation of the concepts.
4. Acceptable 4.68 points
The poster is presented effectively and contains all of the required elements.
3. Approaching 4.13 points
The poster contains minor inconsistencies that are not overly distracting.
Presentation contains a majority of the required elements.
2. Insufficient 3.58 points
The poster is ineffective, contains multiple inconsistencies, or is missing a few of the
required elements.
1. Unsatisfactory 0 points
The poster is incoherent, contains major inconsistencies, is not presented
effectively, or is missing a substantial amount of the required elements.
© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.
Mechanics of Writing 2.75 points
Criteria Description
Includes spelling, capitalization, punctuation, grammar, language use, sentence
structure, etc.
5. Target 2.75 points
No mechanical errors are present. Appropriate language choice and sentence
structure are used throughout.
4. Acceptable 2.34 points
Few mechanical errors are present. Suitable language choice and sentence
structure are used.
3. Approaching 2.06 points
Occasional mechanical errors are present. Language choice is generally
appropriate. Varied sentence structure is attempted.
2. Insufficient 1.79 points
Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors are present. Inconsistencies in language
choice or sentence structure are recurrent.
1. Unsatisfactory 0 points
Errors in grammar or syntax are pervasive and impede meaning. Incorrect language
choice or sentence structure errors are found throughout.
© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.
Format/Documentation 2.75 points
Criteria Description
Uses appropriate style, such as APA, MLA, etc., for college, subject, and level;
documents sources using citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc.,
appropriate to assignment and discipline.
5. Target 2.75 points
No errors in formatting or documentation are present.
4. Acceptable 2.34 points
Appropriate format and documentation are used with only minor errors.
3. Approaching 2.06 points
Appropriate format and documentation are used, although there are some obvious
errors.
2. Insufficient 1.79 points
Appropriate format is attempted, but some elements are missing. Frequent errors
in documentation of sources are evident.
1. Unsatisfactory 0 points
Appropriate format is not used. No documentation of sources is provided.
Total 55 points
© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.