Topic 7 assessment

profileRosi_226
PSY-352Rubric-EatingDisorderRisksandTreatmentOptions.pdf

Eating Disorder Risks and Treatment Options - Rubric

Choose One Eating Disorder 2.75 points

Criteria Description

Paper describes the precursors, signs, and symptoms of the eating disorder a family

doctor, friend or family member would notice if an individual has developed the

chosen eating disorder.

5. Target 2.75 points

The poster expertly discusses the influence of the chosen eating disorder on

identity development, self-presentation, and self-esteem. The poster demonstrates

an exceptional understanding of the topic.

4. Acceptable 2.34 points

The poster clearly discusses the influence of the chosen eating disorder on identity

development, self-presentation, and self-esteem The poster demonstrates an

understanding that extends beyond the surface of the topic.

3. Approaching 2.06 points

The poster adequately discusses the influence of the chosen eating disorder on

identity development, self-presentation, and self-esteem. The poster demonstrates

a basic understanding of the topic.

2. Insufficient 1.79 points

The poster inadequately discusses the influence of the chosen eating disorder on

identity development, self-presentation, and self-esteem. The poster demonstrates

a poor understanding of the topic.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

The poster omits or incompletely discusses the influence of the chosen eating

disorder on identity development, self-presentation, and self-esteem. The poster

does not demonstrate understanding of the topic.

Collapse All

© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.

Precursors, Signs, and Symptoms 11 points

Criteria Description

Highlight the key precursors, signs, and symptoms that individuals with this eating

disorder may exhibit. Use engaging visuals or icons to represent these symptoms,

making it easy to grasp the information at a glance.

5. Target 11 points

The poster expertly highlights the key precursors, signs, and symptoms that

individuals with this eating disorder may exhibit. The poster demonstrates an

exceptional understanding of the topic.

4. Acceptable 9.35 points

The poster clearly highlights the key precursors, signs, and symptoms that

individuals with this eating disorder may exhibit. The poster demonstrates an

understanding that extends beyond the surface of the topic.

3. Approaching 8.25 points

The poster adequately highlights the key precursors, signs, and symptoms that

individuals with this eating disorder may exhibit. The poster demonstrates a basic

understanding of the topic.

2. Insufficient 7.15 points

The poster inadequately highlights the key precursors, signs, and symptoms that

individuals with this eating disorder may exhibit. The poster demonstrates a poor

understanding of the topic.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

The poster omits or incompletely highlights the key precursors, signs, and

symptoms that individuals with this eating disorder may exhibit. The poster does

not demonstrate understanding of the topic.

© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.

Biopsychosocial Model Framework 11 points

Criteria Description

Explore the biopsychosocial model as the framework for understanding eating

disorders. Mention the biological, psychological, and social factors that contribute to

the development of the chosen eating disorder.

5. Target 11 points

The poster expertly explores the biopsychosocial model as the framework for

understanding eating disorders. Mentions the biological, psychological, and social

factors that contribute to the development of the chosen eating disorder. The

poster demonstrates an exceptional understanding of the topic.

4. Acceptable 9.35 points

The poster clearly explores the biopsychosocial model as the framework for

understanding eating disorders. Mentions the biological, psychological, and social

factors that contribute to the development of the chosen eating disorder. The

poster demonstrates an understanding that extends beyond the surface of the

topic.

3. Approaching 8.25 points

The poster adequately explores the biopsychosocial model as the framework for

understanding eating disorders. Mentions the biological, psychological, and social

factors that contribute to the development of the chosen eating disorder. The

poster demonstrates a basic understanding of the topic.

2. Insufficient 7.15 points

The poster inadequately explores the biopsychosocial model as the framework for

understanding eating disorders. Mentions the biological, psychological, and social

factors that contribute to the development of the chosen eating disorder. The

poster demonstrates a poor understanding of the topic.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

The poster omits or incompletely explores the biopsychosocial model as the

framework for understanding eating disorders. Mentions the biological,

psychological, and social factors that contribute to the development of the chosen

eating disorder. The poster does not demonstrate understanding of the topic.

© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.

Treatment Options 11 points

Criteria Description

Describe a concise list of treatment options that can be effective in managing the

chosen eating disorder. Include a brief description of each treatment.

5. Target 11 points

The poster expertly describes a concise list of treatment options that can be

effective in managing the chosen eating disorder. Include a brief description of each

treatment.

4. Acceptable 9.35 points

The poster clearly describes a concise list of treatment options that can be effective

in managing the chosen eating disorder. Include a brief description of each

treatment. The poster demonstrates an understanding that extends beyond the

surface of the topic.

3. Approaching 8.25 points

The poster adequately describes a concise list of treatment options that can be

effective in managing the chosen eating disorder. Include a brief description of each

treatment. The poster demonstrates a basic understanding of the topic.

2. Insufficient 7.15 points

The poster inadequately describes a concise list of treatment options that can be

effective in managing the chosen eating disorder. Include a brief description of each

treatment. The poster demonstrates a poor understanding of the topic.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

The poster omits or incompletely describes a concise list of treatment options that

can be effective in managing the chosen eating disorder. Include a brief description

of each treatment. The poster does not demonstrate understanding of the topic.

© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.

Visual Appeal 8.25 points

Criteria Description

Communicates reason for writing and demonstrates awareness of audience.

5. Target 8.25 points

Appropriate and thematic graphic elements are used to make visual connections

that contribute to the understanding of concepts, ideas, and relationships.

Differences in type size or color are used well and consistently. Elements commonly

found in social media websites/apps are present, attractive, used creatively, and

consistently contribute to an expert understanding of concepts, ideas, and

relationships.

4. Acceptable 7.01 points

Thematic graphic elements are used but not always in context. Visual connections

mostly contribute to the understanding of concepts, ideas, and relationships.

Differences in type size or color are used well and consistently. Elements commonly

found in social media websites/apps are present, show some creativity, and

consistently contribute to the understanding of concepts, ideas, and relationships.

3. Approaching 6.19 points

Minimal use of graphic elements is evident. Elements do not consistently contribute

to the understanding of concepts, ideas, and relationships. There is some variation

in type size, color, and layout. Elements commonly found in social media

websites/apps are present but do not consistently contribute to the understanding

of concepts, ideas, and relationships.

2. Insufficient 5.36 points

Color is garish and/or typographic variations are overused and legibility suffers.

Background interferes with readability. Understanding of concepts, ideas, and

relationships is limited. Elements commonly found in social media websites/apps

are limited and/or used unclearly.re is very little awareness of the intended

audience.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

There are few or no graphic elements. No variation in layout or typography is

evident. Elements commonly found in social media websites/apps are missing.

© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.

Presentation 5.5 points

Criteria Description

Advances position or purpose throughout writing; conclusion aligns to and evolves

from development.

5. Target 5.5 points

The poster is presented effectively and all of the required elements creatively

contribute to the presentation of the concepts.

4. Acceptable 4.68 points

The poster is presented effectively and contains all of the required elements.

3. Approaching 4.13 points

The poster contains minor inconsistencies that are not overly distracting.

Presentation contains a majority of the required elements.

2. Insufficient 3.58 points

The poster is ineffective, contains multiple inconsistencies, or is missing a few of the

required elements.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

The poster is incoherent, contains major inconsistencies, is not presented

effectively, or is missing a substantial amount of the required elements.

© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.

Mechanics of Writing 2.75 points

Criteria Description

Includes spelling, capitalization, punctuation, grammar, language use, sentence

structure, etc.

5. Target 2.75 points

No mechanical errors are present. Appropriate language choice and sentence

structure are used throughout.

4. Acceptable 2.34 points

Few mechanical errors are present. Suitable language choice and sentence

structure are used.

3. Approaching 2.06 points

Occasional mechanical errors are present. Language choice is generally

appropriate. Varied sentence structure is attempted.

2. Insufficient 1.79 points

Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors are present. Inconsistencies in language

choice or sentence structure are recurrent.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

Errors in grammar or syntax are pervasive and impede meaning. Incorrect language

choice or sentence structure errors are found throughout.

© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.

Format/Documentation 2.75 points

Criteria Description

Uses appropriate style, such as APA, MLA, etc., for college, subject, and level;

documents sources using citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc.,

appropriate to assignment and discipline.

5. Target 2.75 points

No errors in formatting or documentation are present.

4. Acceptable 2.34 points

Appropriate format and documentation are used with only minor errors.

3. Approaching 2.06 points

Appropriate format and documentation are used, although there are some obvious

errors.

2. Insufficient 1.79 points

Appropriate format is attempted, but some elements are missing. Frequent errors

in documentation of sources are evident.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

Appropriate format is not used. No documentation of sources is provided.

Total 55 points

© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.