Topic 1 Assessment
Media Claims Versus Empirical Facts - Rubric
Five Media Claims and Scienti�c Facts 20 points
Criteria Description
Identify five media claims and scientific facts that support and refute claims. One
media claim should be historical and at least one media claim should be related to
religion.
5. Target 20 points
Worksheet expertly identifies five media claims and scientific facts. Of the provided
claims, one or more are historical, and one or more are related to religion. The
descriptions are comprehensive and insightful with relevant evidence to support
and refute claims. Worksheet demonstrates an exceptional understanding of the
topic.
4. Acceptable 17 points
Worksheet clearly identifies five media claims and scientific facts. Of the provided
claims, one is historical, and one is related to religion. The descriptions are strong
with sound analysis and some evidence to support and refute claims. Worksheet
demonstrates an understanding that extends beyond the surface of the topic.
3. Approaching 15 points
Worksheet adequately identifies four or more media claims and scientific facts. Of
the provided claims, one is historical, and one is related to religion. The descriptions
are limited and lack some evidence that supports and refutes claims. Worksheet
demonstrates a basic understanding of the topic.
2. Insufficient 13 points
Worksheet inadequately identifies three or more media claims and scientific facts.
Of the provided claims one is not historical or related to religion. The descriptions
are weak and missing evidence that supports and refutes claims. Worksheet
demonstrates a poor understanding of the topic.
1. Unsatisfactory 0 points
Worksheet omits or incompletely identifies media claims and scientific facts that
support and refute claims with at least one media claim being historical and one
being related to religion. Worksheet does not demonstrate understanding of the
topic.
Collapse All
© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.
Research-Based Information 20 points
Criteria Description
Locate research-based information.
5. Target 20 points
Worksheet expertly describes research-based information, and description is
comprehensive and insightful with relevant evidence to support claims. Worksheet
demonstrates an exceptional understanding of the topic.
4. Acceptable 17 points
Worksheet clearly describes research-based information, and description is strong
with sound analysis and some evidence to support claims. Worksheet demonstrates
an understanding that extends beyond the surface of the topic.
3. Approaching 15 points
Worksheet adequately describes research-based information, but description is
limited and lacks some evidence to support claims. Worksheet demonstrates a
basic understanding of the topic.
2. Insufficient 13 points
Worksheet inadequately describes research-based information. Description is weak
and missing evidence to support claims. Worksheet demonstrates a poor
understanding of the topic.
1. Unsatisfactory 0 points
Worksheet omits or incompletely describes research-based information. Worksheet
does not demonstrate understanding of the topic.
© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.
Mechanics of Writing 5 points
Criteria Description
Includes spelling, capitalization, punctuation, grammar, language use, sentence
structure, etc.
5. Target 5 points
No mechanical errors are present. Appropriate language choice and sentence
structure are used throughout.
4. Acceptable 4.25 points
Few mechanical errors are present. Suitable language choice and sentence
structure are used.
3. Approaching 3.75 points
Occasional mechanical errors are present. Language choice is generally
appropriate. Varied sentence structure is attempted.
2. Insufficient 3.25 points
Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors are present. Inconsistencies in language
choice or sentence structure are recurrent.
1. Unsatisfactory 0 points
Errors in grammar or syntax are pervasive and impede meaning. Incorrect language
choice or sentence structure errors are found throughout.
© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.
Documentation of Sources 5 points
Criteria Description
Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as
appropriate to assignment and style)
5. Target 5 points
Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment
and style, and format is free of error.
4. Acceptable 4.25 points
Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is
mostly correct.
3. Approaching 3.75 points
Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some
formatting errors may be present.
2. Insufficient 3.25 points
Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to
assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors.
1. Unsatisfactory 0 points
Sources are not documented.
Total 50 points
© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.