Psychology Topic 6 Assignment

Rosi_226

PSY-260Rubric-ArticleInterrogation.pdf

Home >Psychology homework help >Psychology Topic 6 Assignment

Article Interrogation - Rubric

Four Big Validities 30 points

Criteria Description

Demonstrate an ability to ask and evaluate answers about the four big validities

5. Target 30 points

Demonstration of an ability to ask and evaluate answers about the four big

validities is comprehensive and well-researched.

4. Acceptable 25.5 points

Demonstration of an ability to ask and evaluate answers about the four big

validities is thoughtful.

3. Approaching 22.5 points

Demonstration of an ability to ask and evaluate answers about the four big

validities is clear.

2. Insufficient 19.5 points

Demonstration of an ability to ask and evaluate answers about the four big

validities is vague and inconsistent.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

Does not demonstrate an ability to ask and evaluate answers about the four big

validities.

Collapse All

© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.

https://www.gce.com/

Importance of Validities Depending on the Claim 25 points

Criteria Description

Describe which validities are most important depending on the claim

5. Target 25 points

Description of which validities are most important are well-researched and provide

relevant examples of validities and claims.

4. Acceptable 21.25 points

Description of which validities are most important are thoughtful and make

connections between the importance of validities and claims.

3. Approaching 18.75 points

Description of which validities are most important are clear and make some

connection to claims.

2. Insufficient 16.25 points

Description of which validities are most important are vague and inconsistent. Does

not make any connection between validities and claims.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

Does not describe which validities are most important.

https://www.gce.com/

Study's Methods and Results 25 points

Criteria Description

Analysis of the study's methods and results are accurate

5. Target 25 points

Analysis of the study's methods and results are accurate and well-researched.

Analysis provides references to support methods and results.

4. Acceptable 21.25 points

Analysis of the study's methods and results are accurate and make some

connections to research.

3. Approaching 18.75 points

Analysis of the study's methods and results are accurate and clear.

2. Insufficient 16.25 points

Analysis of the study's methods and results are vague and inconsistent.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

Analysis of the study's methods and results are missing.

https://www.gce.com/

Thesis, Position, or Purpose 5 points

Criteria Description

Communicates reason for writing and demonstrates awareness of audience.

5. Target 5 points

The thesis, position, or purpose is clearly communicated throughout and clearly

directed to a specific audience.

4. Acceptable 4.25 points

The thesis, position, or purpose is adequately presented. An awareness of the

appropriate audience is demonstrated.

3. Approaching 3.75 points

The thesis, position, or purpose is discernable in most aspects but is occasionally

weak or unclear. There is limited awareness of the appropriate audience.

2. Insufficient 3.25 points

The thesis, position, or purpose is unfocused or confused. There is very little

awareness of the intended audience.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

The thesis, position, or purpose is not discernible. No awareness of the appropriate

audience is evident.

https://www.gce.com/

Development, Structure, and Conclusion 5 points

Criteria Description

Advances position or purpose throughout writing; conclusion aligns to and evolves

from development.

5. Target 5 points

The thesis, position, or purpose is logically advanced throughout. The progression

of ideas is coherent and unified. A clear and logical conclusion aligns to the

development of the purpose.

4. Acceptable 4.25 points

The thesis, position, or purpose is advanced in most aspects. Ideas clearly build on

each other. Conclusion aligns to the development of the purpose.

3. Approaching 3.75 points

Limited advancement of thesis, position, or purpose is discernable. There are

inconsistencies in organization or the relationship of ideas. Conclusion is simplistic

and not fully aligned to the development of the purpose.

2. Insufficient 3.25 points

Writing lacks logical progression of the thesis, position, or purpose. Some

organization is attempted, but ideas are disconnected. Conclusion is unclear and

not supported by the overall development of the purpose.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

No advancement of the thesis, position, or purpose is evident. Connections

between paragraphs are missing or inappropriate. No conclusion is offered.

https://www.gce.com/

Evidence 4 points

Criteria Description

Selects and integrates evidence to support and advance position/purpose; considers

other perspectives.

5. Target 4 points

Specific and appropriate evidence is included. Relevant perspectives of others are

clearly considered.

4. Acceptable 3.4 points

Relevant evidence that includes other perspectives is used.

3. Approaching 3 points

Evidence is used but is insufficient or of limited relevance. Simplistic explanation or

integration of other perspectives is present.

2. Insufficient 2.6 points

Evidence is limited or irrelevant. The interpretation of other perspectives is

superficial or incorrect.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

Evidence to support the thesis, position, or purpose is absent. The writing relies

entirely on the perspective of the writer.

https://www.gce.com/

Mechanics of Writing 4 points

Criteria Description

Includes spelling, capitalization, punctuation, grammar, language use, sentence

structure, etc.

5. Target 4 points

No mechanical errors are present. Appropriate language choice and sentence

structure are used throughout.

4. Acceptable 3.4 points

Few mechanical errors are present. Suitable language choice and sentence

structure are used.

3. Approaching 3 points

Occasional mechanical errors are present. Language choice is generally

appropriate. Varied sentence structure is attempted.

2. Insufficient 2.6 points

Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors are present. Inconsistencies in language

choice or sentence structure are recurrent.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

Errors in grammar or syntax are pervasive and impede meaning. Incorrect language

choice or sentence structure errors are found throughout.

https://www.gce.com/

Format/Documentation 2 points

Criteria Description

Uses appropriate style, such as APA, for college, subject, and level; documents sources

using citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., appropriate to assignment

and discipline.

5. Target 2 points

No errors in formatting or documentation are present.

4. Acceptable 1.7 points

Appropriate format and documentation are used with only minor errors.

3. Approaching 1.5 points

Appropriate format and documentation are used, although there are some obvious

errors.

2. Insufficient 1.3 points

Appropriate format is attempted, but some elements are missing. Frequent errors

in documentation of sources are evident.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

Appropriate format is not used. No documentation of sources is provided.

Total 100 points

https://www.gce.com/