Psychology Topic 3 Assignment

Rosi_226

PSY-255Rubric-TraitTheoryWorksheet-ONLObj.3.1and3.3.pdf

Home >Psychology homework help >Psychology Topic 3 Assignment

Trait Theory Worksheet - ONL (Obj. 3.1 and 3.3) - Rubric

Percentile Scores 10 points

Criteria Description

List your percentile scores for each category as they appear on the site (Open-

Mindedness, Conscientiousness, Extraversion, Agreeableness, and Negative

Emotionality).

5. Target 10 points

The response expertly lists the student’s percentile scores for each category as they

appear on the site.

4. Acceptable 8.5 points

The response clearly lists the student’s percentile scores for each category as they

appear on the site.

3. Approaching 7.5 points

The response adequately lists the student’s percentile scores for each category as

they appear on the site.

2. Insufficient 6.5 points

The response inadequately lists the student’s percentile scores for each category as

they appear on the site.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

The worksheet omits or incompletely lists the student’s percentile scores for each

category as they appear on the site.

Collapse All

© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.

https://www.gce.com/

Descriptor 10 points

Criteria Description

The site producing the scores provides a descriptor for each score. Discuss a sentence

that particularly stood out to you and why.

5. Target 10 points

The response expertly discusses a sentence from one of the score descriptors that

stood out to the student and why.

4. Acceptable 8.5 points

The response clearly discusses a sentence from one of the score descriptors that

stood out to the student and why.

3. Approaching 7.5 points

The response adequately discusses a sentence from one of the score descriptors

that stood out to the student and why.

2. Insufficient 6.5 points

The response inadequately discusses a sentence from one of the score descriptors

that stood out to the student and why.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

The response omits or incompletely discusses a sentence from one of the score

descriptors that stood out to the student and why.

https://www.gce.com/

Bene�t of Using Personality Testing 20 points

Criteria Description

Utilizing at least one peer-reviewed resource, write a paragraph explaining the benefit

of using personality testing in order to determine whether an individual should be

employed in a specific job.

5. Target 20 points

The response expertly explains the benefit of using personality testing in order to

determine whether an individual should be employed in a specific job. The student

exceptionally uses at least one peer-reviewed resource to support their response.

4. Acceptable 17 points

The response clearly explains the benefit of using personality testing in order to

determine whether an individual should be employed in a specific job. The student

uses at least one peer-reviewed resources to support their response.

3. Approaching 15 points

The response adequately explains the benefit of using personality testing in order

to determine whether an individual should be employed in a specific job. The

student minimally uses at least one peer-reviewed resource to support their

response.

2. Insufficient 13 points

The response inadequately explains the benefit of using personality testing in order

to determine whether an individual should be employed in a specific job. The

student poorly uses at least one peer-reviewed resource to support their response.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

The response omits or incompletely explains the benefit of using personality testing

in order to determine whether an individual should be employed in a specific job.

The student does not use at least one peer-reviewed resource to support their

response.

https://www.gce.com/

Limitations of Using Personality Testing 20 points

Criteria Description

Utilizing at least one peer-reviewed resource, write a paragraph explaining the

limitations of using personality testing in order to determine whether an individual

should be employed in a specific job.

5. Target 20 points

The response expertly explains the limitations of using personality testing in order

to determine whether an individual should be employed in a specific job. The

response exceptionally uses at least one peer-reviewed resource to support their

response.

4. Acceptable 17 points

The response clearly explains the limitations of using personality testing in order to

determine whether an individual should be employed in a specific job. The

response uses at least one peer-reviewed resource to support their response.

3. Approaching 15 points

The response adequately explains the limitations of using personality testing in

order to determine whether an individual should be employed in a specific job. The

student minimally uses at least one peer-reviewed resource to support their

response.

2. Insufficient 13 points

The response inadequately explains the limitations of using personality testing in

order to determine whether an individual should be employed in a specific job. The

student poorly uses at least one peer-reviewed resource to support their response.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

The response omits or incompletely explains the limitations of using personality

testing in order to determine whether an individual should be employed in a

specific job. The student does not use at least one peer-reviewed resource to

support their response.

https://www.gce.com/

Results of Signi�cant Other 20 points

Criteria Description

Imagine a situation where a person suddenly had access to the test results of a

boyfriend/girlfriend. Explain why this person may have a strong desire to review the

results of their significant other. Discuss what social and ethical problems could arise

from seeing their results.

5. Target 20 points

The response expertly explains why this person may have a strong desire to review

the results of their significant other. The response exceptionally discusses what

social and ethical problems could arise from seeing their results.

4. Acceptable 17 points

The response clearly explains why this person may have a strong desire to review

the results of their significant other. The response discusses what social and ethical

problems could arise from seeing their results.

3. Approaching 15 points

The response adequately explains why this person may have a strong desire to

review the results of their significant other. The response minimally discusses what

social and ethical problems could arise from seeing their results.

2. Insufficient 13 points

The response inadequately explains why this person may have a strong desire to

review the results of their significant other. The response poorly discusses what

social and ethical problems could arise from seeing their results.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

The response omits or incompletely explains why this person may have a strong

desire to review the results of their significant other. The response does not discuss

what social and ethical problems could arise from seeing their results.

https://www.gce.com/

Pro�les of Community Leaders 10 points

Criteria Description

Discuss if we should know the personality profiles of our community leaders. Discuss

what the public might gain or lose from having those profiles.

5. Target 10 points

The response expertly discusses if the public should know the personality profiles

of their community leaders. The response exceptionally discuss what the public

might gain or lose from having those profiles..

4. Acceptable 8.5 points

The response clearly discusses if the public should know the personality profiles of

their community leaders. The response discuss what the public might gain or lose

from having those profiles..

3. Approaching 7.5 points

The response adequately discusses if the public should know the personality

profiles of their community leaders. The response minimally discusses what the

public might gain or lose from having those profiles..

2. Insufficient 6.5 points

The response inadequately discusses if the public should know the personality

profiles of their community leaders. The response poorly discusses what the public

might gain or lose from having those profiles..

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

The response omits or incompletely discusses if the public should know the

personality profiles of their community leaders. The response does not discuss

what the public might gain or lose from having those profiles.

https://www.gce.com/

Language Use and Audience Awareness 5 points

Criteria Description

Includes sentence construction, word choice, etc.

5. Target 5 points

The writer uses a variety of sentence constructions, figures of speech, and word

choice in distinctive and creative ways that are appropriate to purpose, discipline,

and scope.

4. Acceptable 4.25 points

The writer is clearly aware of audience, uses a variety of appropriate vocabulary for

the target audience, and uses figures of speech to communicate clearly.

3. Approaching 3.75 points

Language is appropriate to the targeted audience for the most part.

2. Insufficient 3.25 points

Some distracting inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word choice are

present. The writer exhibits some lack of control in using figures of speech

appropriately.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

Inappropriate word choice and lack of variety in language use are evident. Writer

appears to be unaware of audience. Use of primer prose indicates writer either

does not apply figures of speech or uses them inappropriately.

https://www.gce.com/

Mechanics of Writing 5 points

Criteria Description

Includes spelling, capitalization, punctuation, grammar, language use, sentence

structure, etc.

5. Target 5 points

No mechanical errors are present. Appropriate language choice and sentence

structure are used throughout.

4. Acceptable 4.25 points

Few mechanical errors are present. Suitable language choice and sentence

structure are used.

3. Approaching 3.75 points

Occasional mechanical errors are present. Language choice is generally

appropriate. Varied sentence structure is attempted.

2. Insufficient 3.25 points

Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors are present. Inconsistencies in language

choice or sentence structure are recurrent.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

Errors in grammar or syntax are pervasive and impede meaning. Incorrect language

choice or sentence structure errors are found throughout.

Total 100 points

https://www.gce.com/