Psychology Topic 5 Assignment

Rosi_226

PSY-255Rubric-PersonalReflectionandGrowthPlanRoughDraft.pdf

Home >Psychology homework help >Psychology Topic 5 Assignment

Personal Reflection and Growth Plan Rough Draft - Rubric

Personal Re�ection 16 points

Criteria Description

Discusses student’s personality traits, strengths, weaknesses, and tendencies and how

these traits have influenced their personal growth and development.

5. Target 16 points

The paper expertly discusses the student’s personality traits, strengths,

weaknesses, and tendencies and how these traits have influenced their personal

growth and development. The paper demonstrates an exceptional understanding of

the topic.

4. Acceptable 13.6 points

The paper clearly discusses the student’s personality traits, strengths, weaknesses,

and tendencies and how these traits have influenced their personal growth and

development. The paper demonstrates an understanding that extends beyond the

surface of the topic.

3. Approaching 12 points

The paper adequately discusses the student’s personality traits, strengths,

weaknesses, and tendencies and how these traits have influenced their personal

growth and development. The paper demonstrates a basic understanding of the

topic.

2. Insufficient 10.4 points

The paper inadequately discusses the student’s personality traits, strengths,

weaknesses, and tendencies and how these traits have influenced their personal

growth and development. The paper demonstrates a poor understanding of the

topic.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

The paper omits or incompletely discusses the student’s personality traits,

strengths, weaknesses, and tendencies and how these traits have influenced their

personal growth and development. The paper does not demonstrate understanding

of the topic.

Collapse All

© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.

https://www.gce.com/

Areas of Personal Growth 20 points

Criteria Description

Discusses two to three areas of personal growth that the student would like to focus

on.

5. Target 20 points

The paper expertly discusses two to three areas of personal growth that the

student would like to focus on. The paper demonstrates an exceptional

understanding of the topic.

4. Acceptable 17 points

The paper clearly discusses two to three areas of personal growth that the student

would like to focus on. The paper demonstrates an understanding that extends

beyond the surface of the topic.

3. Approaching 15 points

The paper adequately discusses two to three areas of personal growth that the

student would like to focus on. The paper demonstrates a basic understanding of

the topic.

2. Insufficient 13 points

The paper inadequately discusses two to three areas of personal growth that the

student would like to focus on. The paper demonstrates a poor understanding of

the topic.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

The paper omits or incompletely discusses two to three areas of personal growth

that the student would like to focus on. The paper does not demonstrate

understanding of the topic.

https://www.gce.com/

Theoretical Perspective Strategies and Techniques 20 points

Criteria Description

Identifies strategies and techniques that can help the student work towards their

chosen areas of personal growth using theoretical perspectives and assessments from

the course.

5. Target 20 points

The paper expertly identifies strategies and techniques that can help the student

work towards their chosen areas of personal growth using theoretical perspectives

and assessments from the course. The paper demonstrates an exceptional

understanding of the topic.

4. Acceptable 17 points

The paper clearly identifies strategies and techniques that can help the student

work towards their chosen areas of personal growth using theoretical perspectives

and assessments from the course. The paper demonstrates an understanding that

extends beyond the surface of the topic.

3. Approaching 15 points

The paper adequately identifies strategies and techniques that can help the student

work towards their chosen areas of personal growth using theoretical perspectives

and assessments from the course. The paper demonstrates a basic understanding

of the topic.

2. Insufficient 13 points

The paper inadequately identifies strategies and techniques that can help the

student work towards their chosen areas of personal growth using theoretical

perspectives and assessments from the course. The paper demonstrates a poor

understanding of the topic.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

The paper omits or incompletely identifies strategies and techniques that can help

the student work towards their chosen areas of personal growth using theoretical

perspectives and assessments from the course. The paper does not demonstrate

understanding of the topic.

https://www.gce.com/

Instructor Feedback Implementation 8 points

Criteria Description

Implements instructor feedback received from the outline assignment.

5. Target 8 points

The paper expertly implements instructor feedback received from the outline

assignment. The paper demonstrates an exceptional understanding of the topic.

4. Acceptable 6.8 points

The paper clearly implements instructor feedback received from the outline

assignment. The paper demonstrates an understanding that extends beyond the

surface of the topic.

3. Approaching 6 points

The paper adequately implements instructor feedback received from the outline

assignment. The paper demonstrates a basic understanding of the topic.

2. Insufficient 5.2 points

The paper inadequately implements instructor feedback received from the outline

assignment. The paper demonstrates a poor understanding of the topic.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

The paper omits or incompletely implements instructor feedback received from the

outline assignment. The paper does not demonstrate understanding of the topic.

https://www.gce.com/

Thesis, Position, or Purpose 4 points

Criteria Description

Communicates reason for writing and demonstrates awareness of audience.

5. Target 4 points

The thesis, position, or purpose is clearly communicated throughout and clearly

directed to a specific audience.

4. Acceptable 3.4 points

The thesis, position, or purpose is adequately presented. An awareness of the

appropriate audience is demonstrated.

3. Approaching 3 points

The thesis, position, or purpose is discernable in most aspects but is occasionally

weak or unclear. There is limited awareness of the appropriate audience.

2. Insufficient 2.6 points

The thesis, position, or purpose is unfocused or confused. There is very little

awareness of the intended audience.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

The thesis, position, or purpose is not discernible. No awareness of the appropriate

audience is evident.

https://www.gce.com/

Development, Structure, and Conclusion 4 points

Criteria Description

Advances position or purpose throughout writing; conclusion aligns to and evolves

from development.

5. Target 4 points

The thesis, position, or purpose is logically advanced throughout. The progression

of ideas is coherent and unified. A clear and logical conclusion aligns to the

development of the purpose.

4. Acceptable 3.4 points

The thesis, position, or purpose is advanced in most aspects. Ideas clearly build on

each other. Conclusion aligns to the development of the purpose.

3. Approaching 3 points

Limited advancement of thesis, position, or purpose is discernable. There are

inconsistencies in organization or the relationship of ideas. Conclusion is simplistic

and not fully aligned to the development of the purpose.

2. Insufficient 2.6 points

Writing lacks logical progression of the thesis, position, or purpose. Some

organization is attempted, but ideas are disconnected. Conclusion is unclear and

not supported by the overall development of the purpose.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

No advancement of the thesis, position, or purpose is evident. Connections

between paragraphs are missing or inappropriate. No conclusion is offered.

https://www.gce.com/

Evidence 3.2 points

Criteria Description

Selects and integrates evidence to support and advance position/purpose; considers

other perspectives.

5. Target 3.2 points

Specific and appropriate evidence is included. Relevant perspectives of others are

clearly considered.

4. Acceptable 2.72 points

Relevant evidence that includes other perspectives is used.

3. Approaching 2.4 points

Evidence is used but is insufficient or of limited relevance. Simplistic explanation or

integration of other perspectives is present.

2. Insufficient 2.08 points

Evidence is limited or irrelevant. The interpretation of other perspectives is

superficial or incorrect.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

Evidence to support the thesis, position, or purpose is absent. The writing relies

entirely on the perspective of the writer.

https://www.gce.com/

Mechanics of Writing 3.2 points

Criteria Description

Includes spelling, capitalization, punctuation, grammar, language use, sentence

structure, etc.

5. Target 3.2 points

No mechanical errors are present. Appropriate language choice and sentence

structure are used throughout.

4. Acceptable 2.72 points

Few mechanical errors are present. Suitable language choice and sentence

structure are used.

3. Approaching 2.4 points

Occasional mechanical errors are present. Language choice is generally

appropriate. Varied sentence structure is attempted.

2. Insufficient 2.08 points

Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors are present. Inconsistencies in language

choice or sentence structure are recurrent.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

Errors in grammar or syntax are pervasive and impede meaning. Incorrect language

choice or sentence structure errors are found throughout.

https://www.gce.com/

Format/Documentation 1.6 points

Criteria Description

Uses appropriate style, such as APA, MLA, etc., for college, subject, and level;

documents sources using citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc.,

appropriate to assignment and discipline.

5. Target 1.6 points

No errors in formatting or documentation are present.

4. Acceptable 1.36 points

Appropriate format and documentation are used with only minor errors.

3. Approaching 1.2 points

Appropriate format and documentation are used, although there are some obvious

errors.

2. Insufficient 1.04 points

Appropriate format is attempted, but some elements are missing. Frequent errors

in documentation of sources are evident.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

Appropriate format is not used. No documentation of sources is provided.

Total 80 points

https://www.gce.com/