#35321 Plagiarized

Filename: Finished_Order_3335321_1.docx Date: 2018-10-03 20:58 UTC Results of plagiarism analysis from 2018-10-03 21:00 UTC

90 matches from 17 sources, of which 17 are online sources.

PlagLevel: 42.5%/47.6%

[0] (11 matches, 30.6%/34.0%) from https://www.coursehero.com/file/p6gk65d/...rnal-Validity-In-the-case-of-this-study/ [1] (7 matches, 11.9%) from https://www.customnursingpapers.com/validity-quantitative-research-designs/

(+ 6 documents with identical matches) [8] (6 matches, 10.5%) from https://www.rushtermpapers.com/critique-template-for-a-quantitative-study/

(+ 2 documents with identical matches) [11] (4 matches, 6.5%) from https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/nurs6052 [12] (1 matches, 0.0%5.1%) from https://www.coursehero.com/file/31331421/Four-Aspects-of-Validitydocx/ [13] (2 matches, 4.3%) from https://nicheprogram.org/sites/niche/fil...aint-Vincent-Hospital-Success-Story-.pdf [14] (2 matches, 4.3%) from https://scholarlyworks.lvhn.org/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1703&context=surgery [15] (1 matches, 0.0%4.2%) from https://quizlet.com/12370250/research-2-flash-cards/ [16] (2 matches, 4.2%) from www.aannet.org/initiatives/choosing-wisely/immobility-ambulation

Settings Sensitivity: Medium Bibliography: Consider text Citation detection: Reduce PlagLevel Whitelist: --

Analyzed document

=====================1/4====================== Quantitative Research Designs

Title: Validity in Quantitative Research Designs Name:[1] ... Date:

=====================2/4====================== Quantitative Research Designs Recommendations to Strengthen Internal Validity In the case of this study, internal validity could have been strengthened by having a more clear and concise set of guidelines for the control group.[0] The control group was supposed to be what a normal nursing unit would do for patient;[0] however, the data can be seen as confusing.[0] Instead the study could have been stronger if it was first assessed how often patients are ambulated, put in a chair for eating, and how often patients are ambulated for toileting for this specific unit.[0] The control group could have then used that data for all the patients.[0] This would make the data more clear and concise.[0] The groups should have been divided up evenly instead of the treatment group having a lower fall risk score and a better get up and go test result. The patients should have also come from the same type of environment prior to admission with the same functional statuses.[0] The patients should also either all use an assistive device prior to admission or all not use an assistive device.[0] The participants in the two groups should have been as similar as can be to avoid issues with internal validity. Effects Changes Could Have With the Other 3 Types of Validity Statistical conclusion

validity refers to the relationship of the cause and effect having no interference. Construct validity is the intervention being a positive representation of what was theorized and dependent variables represent what was intended (Polit & Beck, 2107). “External validity concerns whether inferences about observed relationships will hold over variations in persons, setting, time, or measures of the outcomes”[12] [15] [0] (Polit & Beck, 2017, p. 216) It can be seen the study could have been performed all around better to maintain all four types of validity.[0] Having a clearer set up guidelines for the control group would also help further maintain the statistical conclusion validity by providing the best evidence that the relationship between the implementation of GENESIS and the outcome of improved function and decreased LOS is real.[0] By ensuring all the =====================3/4====================== Quantitative Research Designs participant are from the same environment and using the same assistive devices, basically having the same function status it will ensure construct validity. It would then be a good representation that the dependent variable shows what was intended.

=====================4/4====================== Quantitative Research Designs References Metheny, N. A., Davis-Jackson, J., & Stewart, B. J. (2010). Effectiveness of an aspiration risk- reduction protocol.[1] ... Nursing Research, 59(1), 18–25.[1] ... Padula, C. A., Hughes, C., & Baumhover, L. (2009). Impact of a nurse-driven mobility protocol on functional decline in hospitalized older adults.[1] ... Journal of Nursing Care Quality, 24(4), 325–331.[1] ... Yuan, S., Chou, M., Hwu, L., Chang, Y., Hsu, W., & Kuo, H. (2009). An intervention program to promote health-related physical fitness in nurses.[1] ... Journal of Clinical Nursing, 18(10), 1,404–1,411.[1] ...