Human Services

Print

Proposing an Approach and Assessment in Community Collaboration Scoring Guide

Due Date: Unit 9 Percentage of Course Grade: 35%.

Proposing an Approach and Assessment in Community Collaboration Scoring Guide

Criteria	Non-performance	Basic	Proficient	Distinguished
Evaluate community outreach approaches that embrace diversity, ethics, and cultural competency as part of the decision-making process supported by scholarly literature. 20%	Presents minimal to no information regarding community outreach approaches.	Presents one community outreach approach, but does not cite literature and/or evaluate it on all of the following aspects: diversity, ethics, and cultural competency.	Evaluates community outreach approaches that embrace diversity, ethics, and cultural competency as part of the decision-making process supported by scholarly literature.	Promotes one community outreach approach over others to best meet address the community social problem through embracing diversity, ethics, and cultural competency as part of the decision-making process supported by scholarly literature.
Evaluate assessment approaches that pair with recommended community outreach approaches supported by scholarly literature. 20%	Present minimal to no information regarding evaluation related to the new initiative.	Provides data collection ideas to evaluate the initiative without specifically evaluating an assessment approach that pairs with recommended community outreach approaches.	Evaluates assessment approaches that pair with recommended community outreach approaches supported by scholarly literature.	Recommends, with the support of scholarly literature, one evaluation approach that specifically aligns with the recommended community outreach approach.
Assess how historical context may help or hinder recommended approaches. 20%	Presents minimal to no information related to the historical context of this initiative.	Discusses the historical context, but does not link it to the initiative.	Assesses how historical context may help or hinder recommended approaches.	Proposes ways to leverage or to compensate for historical context to strengthen the potential success of recommended approaches.
Create a presentation to show options to the task force that elicit communication, collaboration, and inclusion if not consensus. 20%	Presents no exemplars of communication with the task force.	Provides exemplars of communication with the task force that elicit communication and collaboration, but does not present specific information about the initiative options.	Creates a presentation to show options to the task force that elicit communication, collaboration, and inclusion if not consensus.	Creates a presentation using Note pages to provide narration and supporting literature as a medium of eliciting communication, collaboration, and inclusion if not consensus.
Communicate in a manner that is scholarly, professional, and respectful of the diversity, dignity, and integrity of others consistent with expectations for members of the human services profession. 20%	Does not communicate in a manner that is scholarly, professional, and respectful of the diversity, dignity, and integrity of others consistent with expectations for members of the human services profession.	Inconsistently communicates in a manner that is scholarly, professional, and respectful of the diversity, dignity, and integrity of others. Falls short of meeting the expectations for members of the human services profession.	Communicates in a manner that is scholarly, professional, and respectful of the diversity, dignity, and integrity of others consistent with expectations for members of the human services profession.	Clearly, consistently and concisely communicates in a manner that is scholarly, professional, and respectful of the diversity, dignity, and integrity of others consistent with expectations for members of the human services profession.