|
Proposal Grading Rubric - 75 pts
|
|
Criteria
|
Ratings
|
Pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeLength
|
|
5.0 pts
Meets length requirement
|
0.0 pts
Does not meet length requirement
|
|
5.0 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeThesis/Claim
|
|
10.0 pts
The thesis contains the main claim that can be argued.
|
8.0 pts
The thesis is somewhat vague in its claim and needs to be defined clearly.
|
6.0 pts
The claim cannot be argued.
|
0.0 pts
There is no claim/thesis.
|
|
10.0 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeProposal
|
|
20.0 pts
The proposal exhibits clear direction for supporting the thesis through research. The proposal considers the challenges in the research process and proposes appropriate strategies to overcome the challenges.
|
16.0 pts
The proposal exhibits a fairly clear direction for supporting the thesis through research. The proposal considers the challenges in the research process but might not provide effective approaches to overcome the challenges.
|
12.0 pts
The proposal is unclear in the direction for supporting the thesis and does not consider challenges in the research process.
|
0.0 pts
No effort
|
|
20.0 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSource 1
|
|
10.0 pts
The evidence for each source is detailed and clearly supports the points noted.
|
8.0 pts
The evidence for each source could be expanded further, but the connection to the point is clear, or the evidence is detailed but the connection needs to be fine-tuned.
|
6.0 pts
The evidence for each source is vague or unclear and/or does not support points noted.
|
0.0 pts
No effort
|
|
10.0 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSource 2
|
|
10.0 pts
The evidence for each source is detailed and clearly supports the points noted.
|
8.0 pts
The evidence for each source could be expanded further, but the connection to the point is clear, or the evidence is detailed but the connection needs to be fine-tuned.
|
6.0 pts
The evidence for each source is vague or unclear and/or does not support points noted.
|
0.0 pts
No effort
|
|
10.0 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSource 3
|
|
10.0 pts
The evidence for each source is detailed and clearly supports the points noted.
|
8.0 pts
The evidence for each source could be expanded further, but the connection to the point is clear, or the evidence is detailed but the connection needs to be fine-tuned.
|
6.0 pts
The evidence for each source is vague or unclear and/or does not support points noted.
|
0.0 pts
No effort
|
|
10.0 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWriting
|
|
5.0 pts
The writing is free of major errors in grammar, spelling, and punctuation that would detract from a clear reading of the text.
|
4.0 pts
The writing contains some major errors in grammar, spelling, and punctuation, but the errors do not detract from a clear reading of the text.
|
3.0 pts
The writing contains several major errors in grammar, spelling, and punctuation, and these errors do detract from a clear reading of the text.
|
0.0 pts
No effort
|
|
5.0 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAPA Format
|
|
5.0 pts
All sources are properly cited.
|
4.0 pts
There are a few minor errors in the citations.
|
3.0 pts
There are some major errors in the citations.
|
0.0 pts
No effort
|
|
5.0 pts
|
|
Total Points: 75.0
|
Masaira
ProposalGradingRubric.docx
