For Zeek the Geek Only

Running head: FAKE NEWS

Fake news

Name of institution

Name of institution

2

FAKE NEWS

Introduction

Legitimacy of news is the central focus that should be made regardless of the source to curb the

commonplace fake information. Fake news has impacted negatively on the academic field. Such

invalidated information has exposed the systems of the society to illegitimacy queries without

any reference to how detrimental it might be to be the leadership composition and decision. The

paper establishes to analyze issues that has made social media platforms and journalism bulleting

to appear marred with incorrect and substandard information. Equally is to analyze the influence

of these slanderous information especially in electioneering periods as witnessed in the past US

presidential elections (Allcott and Gentzkow,2017). The subject of fake news cannot be

discussed without an excursion of political views and how the social media investors look to

curb the now rampant fake news in the social space. Identifying if education level has a role to

play in distinguish the correct and standard information from the bogus one. Critically analyzing

if there are any relationships that exists between the societal values and beliefs with the rational

information space and how such relationships can be aligned to prompt attainment of correct and

standard news (Condit, 2017).

Fake news and social media

The influence of social media took precedence in the past couple of decades with the

introduction of Facebook, Google, and Tweeter products. These major platforms have

contributed wholesomely to information access and utilization. While it these platforms have

recorded rising customer base, so is the rising spread of fake information in the social, economic

and political space. Democratization of information has championed the use of these platforms to

suit the interests of malicious parties who are strategically placed to initiate circulation of

3

FAKE NEWS

slanderous, incorrect and substandard information. Continued socialization of social media has

displayed relevance in the content creation and spread of information beyond boundaries.

Information technology also facilitates the spread of news in the social media. With the

emergence of sophisticated information communication gadgets with numerous information

sharing ability, everyone in the 21st century desires and works hard to acquire. The driving force

behind this is to improve connectivity which is a long term composite of spread of information

through the networks (Frank, 2015).

Social media information shows lack of credibility because it is possible that the creator of the

content may be unknown owing to the long chain in the information sharing. As a result, most

information that parties access may be slanderous, with no proper means to establish the creator.

Also, people across board have been prompted to adopt their own perception over information

that is circulating in the media. While it has remained a common challenge in the eve of social

political incumbency, the basic fundamentalism of a rational society where source and use of

information should be perceived credible and its use predictable for the good of the society is

critically facing opposition. This is mainly attributed to the growing need to opt own information

independence because so many news media outlets are taking control of information in the

space. Little is known about copyrights and property rights in the information age with

Facebook, Google and Tweeter failing to establish their likelihood to maintain autonomy of

information shared in through their URLs. A lot of weird information has taken the social sphere

by a surprise. While it is important that the social media organizations should own and control

any information that is created and flowing within such platforms, it has proved hard and out of

control of organizations to establish credibility of any information that is aired in their platforms.

Even if they try to institute informational audit, it will be expensive and engaging to align the

4

FAKE NEWS

process owing to the large virtual space that these platforms encompass (Allcott and Gentzkow,

2017).

Overreliance on current information is another issue that is spurring the spread of information in

the social media. Since people have been made to believe that new information is posted on such

platforms every second, people continue to refresh news feeds to access the most real time news.

Most occasions people post anything they believe would rauge well with their interests. Social

media has been orchestrated by time consuming, less current and invalid information. Horizontal

communication channels contributed to loss of meaning due to ease of manipulation and

consequent tag of friends who will either further render its spread relevant through other social

media platforms. The influence of social media has grown over time due to the possibility of

having the numerous information sources across the globe synchronized over a network of a

device in any location the user is privileged to be (Frank, 2015).

Identifying fake news

Who composes these maligning and slanderous news? How do people discern valid news and

fake news? What prompts spread of fake news? These are but a few questions that have raged in

minds of rational information providers in the globe. Desiring to define the very reasons that

impugns one into holding a series of news releases by a reputable organization over scandals has

been the hardest attempt to make. Almost in daily scenes, organizations have stood firm to

defend themselves from propaganda and malicious news that have been aired on television,

social media platforms, it still remains a challenge establishing if there is any relationship

between news reporters and news makers. Of course yes, while some contend that merely

5

FAKE NEWS

listening or reading does not imply understanding, so is the epistle of fake news. Merely getting

access to it never qualifies it to be credible (Allcott and Gentzkow, 2017).

In most occasions people have failed to discern personal beliefs and values form news. This has

enlisted numerous setbacks on the quality of news that the public get. The impeccable interest of

news provided is to inform. Consequently, people should be trained on what news they need to

access. The whole process begins by developing an indelible understanding of what values and

beliefs are and how their associated biasness on the process of decision making. tal The virole of

information is for decision making. People should not be swayed to use these values and beliefs

as a basis to make decisions because in most cases they are insufficient, irrational and lack

reason in the information cycle. Equally, journalist, a people considered anchors of true

information should demonstrate immeasurable understanding and interpretation of information

so that what they circulate is proven to be valid and shall never be exposed to any element of

biasness. When a society can appreciate such a system, then fake news will have no place

(Condit, 2017).

Fake news has been noted for their improper spelling and layout. The layout of the article

including the alignment of its images are fundamental in proving credibility of the text. Most of

the information and quotes that the news platform might be airing may be presented in a manner

that is hard to comprehend, or some disjointed and others out of context. Such news remains

malicious and might have been created to generate traffic into websites of marketing agencies.

What about the eye catching titles of news that have been so rampant in the social web? They

display the most aggressive and a highly integrated fake news domain that people should be

trained to avoid. Accessing such domains have revealed blackmail and incorrect content hosted

6

FAKE NEWS

there. Creative editors in such cites provide numerous time consuming information aimed at

maintaining a constant traffic generation and flow for malicious economic gain (Condit, 2017).

Crocco et al, 2017 identifies a series of precedence that should be used in evaluation and

interpretation of information in a bid to ensure that evidence based information is what the public

have access to. These principles include: expert judgement, personal experience, second hand

experience, use of illustrations and examples, policy formulations, statistical artefacts and

research information. The other aspects such as individual judgement, value and beliefs are

important in determining how well the one will be accurate and democratic in the process of

creating and spreading news. The potent aspect in creating and spreading credible information

will entirely rely on the existing policies and judgement that govern the institution of information

production and spread. However, credibility of information should easily be determined in case

the above principles are applied in the initial conception of information. Internet is shaping the

social aspects of information. Ranging from incomplete trustworthiness to misconceived

interpretation of the internet information, many people have been exposed to the challenge of

having to rely on inappropriate information in the internet. Young scholars have especially

demonstrated a positive liking to internet information while it is established to be hosting a lot of

bogus information; less researched and shallow ideas which are inappropriately expressed.

Students need to develop a rational analysis that is able to distinguish credibility of what they are

reading (Condit, 2017).

Social economic and political costs of fake news

Fake news is injurious to both the creators and consumers and the subjects of analysis. while We

can assume that the fake information circulating may not implicate us in any way; it might be

7

FAKE NEWS

interfering with the social fabrics of our society. Organizations have filed suits and politicians

have had the greatest pinch as a result of malicious information. Market reputation and political

dominance have been declining at the eve of any maligning information. People have stood out

fiercely to safeguard their interests in organizations when information purported to be costly to

the operations of such organizations. For instance, in the eve of the presidential election in the

U.S, a lot of barbaric n informatiounleashed to the public. Trump’s personal values and beliefs

were perceived as his ultimate political decisions that bounded on the Americans even before

elections were done. People who were opposed to him came up with numerous slanderous

information that aimed to reduce his political influence. It was a battle of titans between Clinton

and Trump. Every had secret weapon of information to hurl to the public in any slated campaign

meeting. Resilience did little impact in the quest to control the growing political pressure (Spratt

and Agosto, 2017).

Also, a post by President Trump’s son during the campaign period that sought to establish

whether Hillary was bribing the electorate in California State had wide circulation since the

people whom he shared the political ideology with shared this information end to end at a time

when political tensions was at its peak. Such a post impacted negatively on the political

reputation of Hillary, and perhaps could be one reason why she lost in the concluded elections.

Fake news has a negative impact (Condit, 2017).

Business organization brace themselves to meet the frustration that malicious competitors might

develop in employees. The objective of businesses is expanded market with a reliable market.

Spreading a slanderous information to the public impacts negatively on the organization. For

instance, a milk producing plan may experience a marketing challenge when it is established that

they lace metallic components in their packed milk. Whichever the case, it might have been

8

FAKE NEWS

established that such an information is untrue and unfairly constituted for selfish gains. Through

the information of internet and social media platforms, spread of this information far and wide

may implicate the marketability of the firm and the eventual declining profits. Slanderous

information has also done gross effects to the economy in general (Frank, 2015).

Conclusion

To this end, the paper has exhaustively presented the issue of fake news as a recent informational

problem. Fake news is usually presented in poorly structured layouts, where some are found to

purposely generate revenue for online marketing firms. Fake news destroys the social fabrics of

the society and reconstitutes political alignments. Also, the businesses and political parties have

faced declining political influence among the electorates. Complementarily, the influence of

social media in the creation and spread of fake new.

9

FAKE NEWS

References

Frank, R. (2015). Caveat Lector: Fake News as Folklore. The American Folklore, 128(509),

315-332.

Spratt, E & Agosto, E (Summer 2017). Young Adult Literacy Services, 15(4), p17, 5p.

Crocco, M, Halvorsen, A, Jacobsen, R (April 2017); Aven. In: Phi Delta Kappan. 98(7),

Phi Delta Kappen. Feb 2017, Vol. 98 Issue 5,6

Allcott, H., & Gentzkow, M. (2017). social Media and Fake News in the 2016 Election. The

Journal of Economic perspective, 31(2), 211-235.

Condit, T. (2017). Post Truth Society and ‘very fake news’. Archeology Ireland, 31(1), 3-3.