Organization Behavior Project

4/2/2019 Project 1: Self Assessment - BMGT 464 7981 Organizational Behavior (2192) - UMUC Learning Management System

https://learn.umuc.edu/d2l/lms/dropbox/user/folder_submit_files.d2l?db=759536&grpid=0&isprv=0&bp=0&ou=350072 12/17

Table

Questions

Answers

Relationship

To Quiz

Results

2.5 points

All questions were answered and answers

relate to the specific evaluations quiz

taken, results were thoroughly evaluated

and conclusions were logically reasoned by using ideas and results obtained

through the quiz and course material; Discussion

showed conclusions insightfully

drawn from the quiz results and test purpose.

(2.25 - 2.5)

2.1245 points

Most questions were answered and answers

relate to the specific evaluation quiz

taken; results were evaluated and

conclusions were mostly logically reasoned by using ideas and results obtained

through the quiz and course material; Answer

development was weak in one to three questions asked and did not always relate the answer to the purpose of the

quiz. (2.0 - 2.249)

1.87 points

Most questions were answered and answers

relate to the specific evaluation quiz

taken; results were evaluated in a general

fashion; conclusions were satisfactorily reasoned by using ideas and results

obtained through the quiz and course material; Answer

development was weak in four to six questions asked and often did not relate the

answer to the purpose of the quiz.

(1.75 - 1.99)

1.6245 points

Questions were attempted but more tha

six were not answered; evaluation

and conclusion/decisio was noted but evidenc of logical reasoning wa missing or opinion wa

offered; discussion showed minimal

understanding the purpose behind the qu

(1.5 - 1.749)

General

Evaluation

Summary

2 points

The summary evaluated the

results from the all the

quizzes drawing conclusions

as to their relevance for

building relationships with

others. Conclusions were

thoroughly

reasoned, insightful and

supported by the various quiz

results and class material.

(1.80 - 2.0)

1.695 points

The summary evaluated the

results from the all the quizzes

drawing conclusions as to their

relevance for building

relationships with

others. Conclusions were well

reasoned and mostly

supported by the various quiz

results and class material

but 1-2 areas needed to

be developed more either in

the reference to a quiz result

or its implications.

(1.6-1.79)

1.495 points

The summary evaluated most

of the quiz results drawing

general conclusions as to their

relevance for building

relationships with

others. Conclusions

were mostly reasoned using

support from the various quiz

results and class material

but some areas needed to

be developed more and or 2-3

quizzes were not mentioned in

the summary.

(1.4-1.59)

1.295 points

A summary was attempte

but only a few quizzes

were referred to in the

summary and the

conclusions drawn were

not reflective of the resu

as a whole.

(1.2-1.39)

4/2/2019 Project 1: Self Assessment - BMGT 464 7981 Organizational Behavior (2192) - UMUC Learning Management System

https://learn.umuc.edu/d2l/lms/dropbox/user/folder_submit_files.d2l?db=759536&grpid=0&isprv=0&bp=0&ou=350072 13/17

Identification

of job(s) that

best fit you

2.5 points

Identification of job(s) that best fit you were thoroughly

evaluated and were logically reasoned by using

ideas obtained and supported through quiz

results and course material; discussion showed an

insightful understanding of your personal skills

(strength and weaknesses shown by quiz results) and how they would

best suit the job(s) selected; application

conclusions were drawn through logical reasoning

whose ideas are supported by quiz results and class

material. (2.25 - 2.5)

2.1245 points

Identification of job(s) that best fit you were evaluated and were logically reasoned by using ideas obtained and

supported through quiz results and course material;

discussion showed a good understanding of your personal skills (strength and weaknesses shown by quiz results) and how they would

best suit the job(s) selected; application

conclusions were mostly drawn through logical

reasoning whose ideas are supported by quiz

results and class material but one area needed more

development. (2.0 - 2.249)

1.87 points

Identification of job(s) that best fit you were evaluated and were generally logically

reasoned by using ideas obtained and supported through quiz results and

course material; discussion showed

a satisfactory understanding of your personal skills

(strength and weaknesses shown by quiz results) and how they would

best suit the job(s) selected; application

conclusions were generally drawn through logical

reasoning whose ideas are supported by quiz

results and class material but two or more

conclusions needed greater development. (1.75 - 1.99)

1.6245 points

Attempt was made to identify a job(s) that be

fit but the conclusions drawn to support the

selection were minimally support

by the quiz results and class material. Opinio

played a large part in th selection rationale.

(1.50 - 1.749)

Reasons for

not selecting

other job

openings

2 points

Reasons for not selecting

other job(s) were thoroughly

evaluated and were logically

reasoned by using ideas

obtained and supported

through quiz results and

course material; discussion

showed an insightful

understanding of your

personal skills (strength and

weaknesses shown by quiz

results) and how they

1.695 points

Reasons for not

selecting job(s) were evaluated

and logically reasoned by using

ideas obtained and supported

through quiz results and

course material; discussion

showed a good understanding

of your personal skills (strength

and weaknesses shown by quiz

results) and how they

would not fit the job(s)

rejected; application

1.495 points

Reasons for not

selecting job(s) were evaluated

and generally logically

reasoned by using ideas

obtained and supported

through quiz results and

course material; discussion

showed

a satisfactory understanding

of your personal skills (strength

and weaknesses shown by quiz

results) and how they would

1.295 points

Attempt was made

to discuss

the job(s) rejected but th

conclusions drawn to

support the selection

were minimally supporte

by the quiz results and

class material. Opinion

played a large part in the

selection rationale.

(1.2-1.39)

4/2/2019 Project 1: Self Assessment - BMGT 464 7981 Organizational Behavior (2192) - UMUC Learning Management System

https://learn.umuc.edu/d2l/lms/dropbox/user/folder_submit_files.d2l?db=759536&grpid=0&isprv=0&bp=0&ou=350072 14/17

would not suit the job(s)

rejected; application

conclusions were drawn

through logical reasoning

whose ideas are supported

by quiz results and class

material.

(1.80- 2.0)

conclusions were mostly

drawn through logical

reasoning whose ideas are

supported by quiz results and

class material but one

area needed more

development.

(1.6-1.79)

not fit the job(s)

rejected; application

conclusions were generally

drawn through logical

reasoning whose ideas are

supported by quiz results and

class material but two or more

conclusions needed greater

development

(1.4-1.59)

Reasons why

your

selection will

be most

beneficial to

the

Organization

2.5 points

Reasons given to support

your job(s) selections as

beneficial to the

organization were thoroughly

evaluated and logically

reasoned by using ideas

obtained and supported

through quiz results and

course material; discussion

showed an insightful

understanding of how your

personal skills (strength and

weaknesses shown by quiz

results) and resulting job(s)

selection would result in

effective and efficient job

performance in the

organization; application

conclusions were drawn

through logical reasoning

whose ideas are supported

by quiz results and class

material.

(2.25 - 2.5)

2.1245 points

Reasons given to support your

job(s) selections as beneficial

to the

organization were evaluated

and logically reasoned by

using ideas obtained and

supported through quiz

results and course material;

discussion showed a

good understanding of

how your personal skills

(strength and

weaknesses shown by quiz

results) and resulting job(s)

selection would result in

effective and efficient job

performance in the

organization; application

conclusions were drawn

through logical reasoning

whose ideas mostly supported

by quiz results and class

material but a few conclusions

were opinion based.

(2.0 - 2.224)

1.87 points

Reasons given to support your

job(s) selections as beneficial

to the

organization were generally

evaluated and mostly logically

reasoned by using ideas

obtained and supported

through quiz results and

course material; discussion

showed a satisfactory

understanding of how your

personal skills (strength and

weaknesses shown by quiz

results) and resulting job(s)

selection would result in

effective and efficient job

performance in the

organization; application

conclusions were drawn

through logical reasoning

whose ideas were

mostly supported by quiz

results and class material but a

few conclusions were opinion

based and or vaguely

described.

(1.75 - 1.99)

1.6245 points

AN attempt was made provide reasons to support your job(s)

selections as beneficia to the organization .Th

evaluation was reason by using a few ideas

obtained and supporte through quiz results an

course material but most were

underdeveloped and weakly

described how your personal skills (strengt and weaknesses show

by quiz results) and resulting job(s) selectio would result in effectiv

and efficient job performance in the

organization and they were opinion based an or vaguely supported b the class material and

quiz results. (1.5 - 1.749)

Use of Quiz 2 points 2.04 points 1.8 points 1.56 points

4/2/2019 Project 1: Self Assessment - BMGT 464 7981 Organizational Behavior (2192) - UMUC Learning Management System

https://learn.umuc.edu/d2l/lms/dropbox/user/folder_submit_files.d2l?db=759536&grpid=0&isprv=0&bp=0&ou=350072 15/17

and Class

Material to

Support

Conclusions

and

Selection

Process

All conclusions and ideas

presented were supported

with appropriate class

resources and case study

facts.

(1.8-2.0)

All conclusions and ideas presented were supported

with appropriate class resources and case study

facts. (1.6-1.79)

Conclusions and ideas presented were satisfactorily supported with appropriate class resources and case study facts however, each case study had one-two

areas where more support was needed to develop

answers. (1.4-1.59)

Attempt was made to support Conclusions an

ideas class resources and case study facts however, each case

study had a significan number of

answers where more support was needed t

develop answers.

(1.2-1.39)

Attention to

Instructions

1 point

The paper contains all major assignment tasks. The paper also includes completion of all minor

aspects of the assignment such as table creation if required, third person

writing, required use of course material, outside

sources if needed, inclusion of page and paragraph

number, no use of books, assignment format and

avoidance of using direct quotes.

(.90 - 1.0)

0.85 points

The paper contains all major assignment tasks. The paper missed one minor

aspects of the assignment such as table creation if required, third person

writing, required use of course material, outside

sources if needed, inclusion of page and paragraph

number, no use of books, assignment format and

avoidance of using direct quotes.

(.80 - .89)

0.75 points

One major assignment tasks or two minor aspects of the assignment missed such as table creation if required, third person writing, required

use of course material, outside sources if needed,

inclusion of page and paragraph number, no use of

books, assignment format and avoidance of using

direct quotes. (.70-.79)

0.65 points

Two major assignmen tasks and/or three min

aspects of the assignments missed a

table creation if require third person writing,

required use of course material, outside sourc

if needed, inclusion o page and paragraph

number, no use of book assignment format an

avoidance of using dire quotes.

(.60--.69)

Writing

Mechanics

0.75 points

Strictly adheres to standard usage rules of written

English using paragraphs and sentence rather than

0.64 points

Excellently adheres to standard usage of

mechanics: conventions of written English, including

0.56 points

Satisfactorily adheres to standard usage rules of

mechanics: conventions of English, including

0.49 points

Minimally adheres to standard usage rules o mechanics: convention

of written English,

4/2/2019 Project 1: Self Assessment - BMGT 464 7981 Organizational Behavior (2192) - UMUC Learning Management System

https://learn.umuc.edu/d2l/lms/dropbox/user/folder_submit_files.d2l?db=759536&grpid=0&isprv=0&bp=0&ou=350072 16/17

Total / 20.04

Overall Score

bullets, including but not limited to capitalization,

punctuation, run-on sentences, missing or extra

words, stylistic errors, spelling and grammatical errors. No contractions or jargon used. Zero to two

errors noted. (.675 - .75)

capitalization, punctuation, and spelling. Three to six

errors noted. (.60 - .675)

capitalization, punctuation, and spelling. Seven to

10 errors noted. (.525 - .59)

including capitalization punctuation, and spellin

More than 10 errors found.

(.45 - .524)

APA Style

(6th ed.)

0.75 points

One to two APA style or usage errors; Proper

citation of source material is used throughout paper;

Reference titles follow APA with only the first word, the first word after a colon and proper nouns capitalized.

(.675- .75)

0.64 points

Attempts in-text citations and reference list but 3 - 4 APA style errors noted or fails to

use APA citations when appropriate 1-2 times.

(.60 - .624)

0.56 points

Attempts in-text citations and reference lists; APA style

errors are noted throughout document with 5-6 errors noted; Fails to use APA

citations when appropriate 3 - 4 times in document.

(.525- .59)

0.49 points

Attempts in-text citation and reference lists; Fa

to use APA citations when appropriate - 5-

6 times or presents on 1-2 in-text citations an

a reference list in a pap when APA citations ar needed throughout the

document. (0.45 -.524)

Excellent

18 points minimum

Good

16 points minimum

Developing

14 points minimum

Needs Improvement

12 points minimum

Failing

0 points minimum

4/2/2019 Project 1: Self Assessment - BMGT 464 7981 Organizational Behavior (2192) - UMUC Learning Management System

https://learn.umuc.edu/d2l/lms/dropbox/user/folder_submit_files.d2l?db=759536&grpid=0&isprv=0&bp=0&ou=350072 17/17

Add a File Record Audio

Submit Assignment

Files to submit

(0) file(s) to submit

After uploading, you must click Submit to complete the submission.

Comments

Paragrap

Font Fam S

Submit Cancel