decision about the project

Page | 1 Asia Pacific International College Pty Ltd. Trading as Asia Pacific International College 55 Regent Street, Chippendale, Sydney 2008: 02-9318 8111 PRV12007; CRICOS 03048D Approved: DATE & Version

Assessment 2: Unit Project Part A

Due date: Week 6

Group/individual: Group

Word count / Time provided: 2500

Weighting: 20%

Unit Learning Outcomes: ULO-1, ULO-2

Assessment Details:

Marking Criteria and Rubric: The assessment will be marked out of 100 and will be weighted 20%

of the total unit mark

In this group assignment, the team selects a decision-making situation where a decision should be made

about a project. In this assignment, the team needs to study the literature and find the best practice

to analyse the situation. The team should also consider, other than cost consideration, to deliver

a project from the perspective of sustainability.

Marking Criteria Not satisfactory

(0-49%) of the criterion mark)

Satisfactory

(50-64%) of the criterion mark

Good

(65-74%) of the criterion mark

Very Good

(75-84%) of the criterion mark

Excellent

(85-100%) of the criterion mark

Describe and discuss the principles of project management economics and project optimisation and related concepts with focus on sustainability (80%)

Inadequate understanding of the principles of project management economics and project optimisation; cannot discuss concepts in own words

Basic knowledge only of the principles of project management economics and project optimisation; limited depth of basic concepts

Exhibits good breadth and depth of understanding of the principles of project management economics, project optimisation and project sustainability

Exhibits very good breadth and depth of understanding of the principles of project management economics, project optimisation and project sustainability

Exhibits excellent breadth and depth of understanding of the principles of project management economics, project optimisation and project sustainability

Overall presentation and integration of the discussion: neat presentation of the essay with title page, and the body of the report that complies with the Harvard style citation, and integrated discussion written in standard English. (10%)

Very badly presented essay; lacks proper format and issues are not integrated discussion written in poor English expression

Satisfactory presentation of essay; but lacks proper format and issues are fairly integrated into discussion. Written in satisfactory English expression

Good presentation of essay; but lacks proper format and issues are integrated into discussion. Written in good English expression

Very good presentation of essay; but lacks proper format and issues are well integrated into discussion. Written in very good English expression

Exceptional presentation of essay; but lacks proper format and issues are well integrated into discussion. Written in excellent English expression

Page | 2 Asia Pacific International College Pty Ltd. Trading as Asia Pacific International College 55 Regent Street, Chippendale, Sydney 2008: 02-9318 8111 PRV12007; CRICOS 03048D Approved: DATE & Version

Referencing: Demonstrates the correct use referencing style for the sources and other materials used in the report. Harvard citation rules are applied in the report and familiarity with rules in citation from sources as well. (10%

Incorrect use of Harvard citation rules in the body and reference list, and/or some citations in the body are not included in the reference list

Satisfactory use of Harvard citation rules in the body and reference list, and/or some citations in the body are included in the reference list

Good use of Harvard citation rules in the body and reference list, and/or citations in the body are included in the reference list

Very good use of Harvard citation rules in the body and reference list, and/or citations in the body are included in the reference list

Exceptional use of Harvard citation rules in the body and reference list, and/or citations in the body are included in the reference list