health informative
Project Grading Rubric – Points
|
|
|
|
|
|
Audience
|
4 (2)- Audience clearly defined, introduction provided, chose sites align with audience |
2-3 (1)- General reference to audience yet chosen sites are not well aligned
|
0-1 (0) - No reference to who would obtain value from reading this |
|
Content
|
5- Robust and rich content , strong evidence of learning, original, well aligned with course learning outcome – exemplary
|
3-4 meets learning outcomes |
1-2 content weak, not original
|
|
Diversity of content
|
4 (2)- Selected sites well distributed .org, .gov, .edu, .com, social media/editorial |
2-3 (1) – some diversity |
0-1 (0)– selected sites not diversely represented |
|
Writing style
|
2 (1) - Solid grammar and strong readability |
1 (.5)- a few typos/grammar concerns |
0 Typos, grammar error distracting - difficult to read |
|
Total |
15 (10) |
|
|
Project Content Grading in (#)
Final Website Project Grading in Red