Find information and fill out the space
PROJECT CHARTER
MGMT 430
Project Charter
|
Project Title: |
Denver T-Rex I-25 Light Rail Project (Ignore Freeway Portion of This Project) (2001-2008) |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Project Sponsor: |
|
|
Date Prepared: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Project Manager: |
Group D (Salim, Citlali, and Carrie) |
|
Project Customer: |
Colorado Department of Transportation / Regional Transportation District |
|
Project Purpose or Justification: |
|
This $1.67 billion highway project and light rail transit line development in the Denver metropolitan area is intended to improve the quality of life for area residents and commuters and mobility in the Denver region. |
|
Project Description: |
|
The Denver T-rex I-25 Light Rail Project is community supported and endorsed by citizens along with the efforts of the Colorado Department of Transportation (CDOT) and the Regional Transportation District (RTD), federal partners Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) and the Federal Transit Administration (FTA), also including other counties, cities, and jurisdictions. This project will include upgrades freeway shoulder capacity and other improvements to the shoulders. This project will also include the addition of new ramps, acceleration/deceleration lanes, better lighting, and other improvements to interchanges. |
|
High-level Project and Product Requirements: |
|
The scope of work for the Denver T-Rex I-25 Light Rail Project shall include but not be limited to: -Electrical Design Assistance & Contracting -Equipment Installation & Maintenance -Planning & consulting Services -Value-Engineering |
|
Summary Budget: |
|
$1.67 Billion Made up of: -Design-build contract with Southeast Corridor Constructors: $1.18 billion -Light rail Costs: $879 million -Highway Costs: $795 million -34 New Light-rail Vehicles: $91.8 million -Elati Street Light Rail Maintenance Facility: $39.5 million |
|
Initial Risks: |
|
Risks would be the extremely expensive land that must be purchased to add freeway lanes which is along a highly urbanized corridor. In addition, adding lanes would also mean repairing and replacing almost 20 bridges and this I-25/I-225 interchange is extremely congested. This would overall complicate decision-making for the project and interfere who has jurisdiction over the construction and management decisions. |
|
Summary Milestones |
Due Date |
|
Project Start |
|
|
|
|
|
. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Project Finish |
|
|
Project Objectives |
Success Criteria |
Person Approving |
|
Scope: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Time: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quality: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acceptance Criteria: |
|
-Minimize inconvenience to citizens of Denver -Stay within their $1.67 Billion Budget -Create and plan a quality project -Complete the project on or before June 2008 |
|
Project Manager Authority Level |
|
Staffing Decisions: |
|
|
|
Budget Management and Variance: |
|
|
|
Technical Decisions: |
|
|
|
Conflict Resolution: |
|
|
|
Escalation Path for Authority Limitations: |
|
|
Approvals:
|
|
|
|
|
Project Manager Signature
|
|
Sponsor or Originator Signature |
|
|
|
|
|
Project Manager Name |
|
Sponsor or Originator Name |
|
|
|
|
Date Date