Final Project Charter nine

profilecjcfor
PROJECTCHARTER.FINAL.docx

Customer logo here

Project Name: Project Charter

Company logo here

Project Name:

Value Driven Project and Portfolio Management in the Pharmaceutical Industry

Project Charter

Project:

Value Driven Project and Portfolio Management in the Pharmaceutical Industry

Title:

Project Charter

Document number:

Version

0.1

Document status:

Final

Author:

Chellyn Jones

Responsible:

Date created:

14/08/2021

Protection class:

"For internal use only"

Document history

Version

Date

Author

Comment/Change

0.1

10/08/2021

Draft

14/08/2021

Final

Page

1 Background/Project purpose or justification 4

2 Goals 5

2.1 Goals

2.2 Scheduling goals/milestones

3 Project product description 6

4 Delivery units 7

4.1 Delivery units/services

5 Project success criteria 8

6 High-level risks 9

7 Key stakeholders 10

8 Assumptions, restrictions and external dependencies 11

9 Responsibility of the customer 12

9.1 Tasks

9.2 Resources and staffing

10 Project category 13

11 Project budget (overview) 14

12 Project startup 15

13 Project end 16

13.1 Signatures for release

Annex 17

A. Glossary and abbreviations 17

B. References, accompanying documents

1. Background/Project Purpose or Justification

Pharmaceuticals' perspective has shifted as a result of the rising healthcare expenses that are currently affecting everyone, and pharmaceuticals are focusing on the generation of value in research and development. Value-driven portfolio management is a term that has long been associated with the financial sector but has recently gained popularity in the pharmaceutical industry. The notion of value-driven portfolio management focuses on connecting a company's strategic goals and objectives with resource allocation. A corporation can raise the value of pharmaceuticals while also lowering healthcare expenses by focusing on studying the risks and effects.

The project's purpose is to create a value-driven project for the pharmaceutical company by following a set of decision-making stages. The steps will include developing a targeted product profile, defining a timeframe, developing a budget that is consistent with the goal product profile, and ultimately developing a stage gate decision-making system.

2. Goals

This section addresses the goals of the project which indicate what the project intends to achieve and the milestones related to the goals established.

a. Goals

Goal

Description

Efficiency

Efficiency in the drug development process will mean that pharmaceuticals develop drugs through maximum utilization of the resources and ensuring that the waste products from the process are as minimal as possible.

Strategic alignment

The goal is to come up with projects that are aligned with financial and strategic goals of pharmaceuticals.

b. Scheduling Goals/Milestones

Schedule

Description

Phase 1

· Defining the scope and the budgets for the projects

· Developing the goals of the project.

· Evaluation of the potential risks

Phase 2

· Coming up with the key performance indicators

· Tracking performance.

· Appraisal of performance.

3. Project Product Description

The pharmaceutical company will have a framework at the end of the project to enable them improve their portfolio by transitioning to a value-based portfolio in the early stages of drug development. This will entail a number of steps, including refining development process techniques, developing a stage gate decision-making method, and aligning MPP and TPP criteria. This will be accomplished by establishing a multi-person portfolio and a project review board that will establish research requirements, stop/go criteria to be utilized for ongoing projects, understanding of capacity requirements for various initiatives, and assisting in the evaluation of development. All the projects which are in the POC stage will be subject to stage gated decisions which will be both quantitative and qualitative. The research portfolios shall be evaluated on the basis of the value, timing, cost, risks involved and the strategic fit.

4. Delivery Units

a. Delivery Units/Services

Delivery Unit

Description/Comment

Target Product Portfolio

A definition of the product profile template that is made up of the targeted categories which align with the company goals that are related to R& D, and marketing.

Stop/go decisions

Definition of the minimum product profile which creates a minimum threshold which is the basis of the stop/go decisions.

Project Evaluation

Establish a review board for project and research portfolios. The board will include senior managers from different departments and will be monitored by CEO.

Definition of TPPs

Definitions of the TPPs for the discovery research.

Scoring method

Coming up with a scoring method that encompasses the value of project, costs involved, the time to market and the risks involved in the process of project evaluation.

Capacity management system

Development of a system which encompasses input from all the project and functional managers.

5. Project Success Criteria

Project Success Criteria

Getting new drugs with the desired value.

Decision making process involves all stakeholders

The financial goals and aims are met.

There is use of decision trees with stages for an effective development process.

Alignment of portfolio with company goals and strategies.

6. High-Level Risks

Risk

Possible Impacts on the Project

Weak MPPs for financial and risk analysis

MPPs which are not well defined and weak will come up with projects which do not fit in the portfolio or are too far in the project cycle to be cut.

There is no buy in from senior management

This means that the organization as a whole is not in support of the portfolio and the impact is that the things remain in status quo.

Premature project management.

The weak project management office or a new office cannot support the high level decisions and analysis that is needed for the current projects.

Undiversification of portfolio

The organizations that do not have a diverse portfolio have no competitive advantage in the healthcare industry.

TPP does not meet customer needs

All R&D decisions are based on TPP and hence if the TPP does not meet the customer needs, there will be no sales for the product and the portfolio will have unsuccessful projects

7. Key Stakeholders

Name

Role

CEO

Makes all the strategic decisions concerning what is a fit for the company.

Shareholders

They are the owners of the company and their desires are given more priority compared to the other stakeholders.

Head of Research &Development

Communicates to the employees on where the research should began and bases proposals on the patient needs and emerging trends.

Functional Managers

Assists with the correct resource allocation for ongoing R&D projects.

Healthcare Providers

Prescription of drugs to patients.

Customers (patients)

Purchasing and consumption of drugs

8. Assumptions, Restrictions and External Dependencies

A

R

E

Item

R

Resources are not sufficient to create an effective review board

R

The portfolio criteria has to be completed within a short period of time so that it is used on the ongoing projects.

R

Resources which develop board do not get along and that results in inefficiency

A

Thought process is needed to change from increasing effectiveness to enhancing process efficiency

A

Company is an established entity in the pharmaceutical industry

E

Portfolios must align with corporate strategy

A

Functional and senior managers are on board with the plan.

A = Assumption

R = Restriction

E = External dependency

9. Responsibility of the Customer

a. Tasks

Task

Comment

Contact

Regulatory agent

Come up with regulatory and market prerequisites for TPP development.

Marketing Department

Customer-Decision maker

Creation of the targeted decision categories TPP

Research and Design Department

Customer representative

Prepare sales forecasts and market research for TPP analysis

Marketing Department

Customer-Financial analyst

Computation of NPVs for current projects to help in decision tree analysis and also sales forecasts.

Project Managers /Marketing Departments

b. Resources and Staffing

Resources/Staffing

Comment

Contact

Assigning resource responsibilities

Definition of the roles of different stakeholders.

Company management.

Staff schedules

Allocation of shifts and the working hours for employees and staff in the organization.

HR management.

Benchmarking

Bring together experts to develop benchmarking for the backup assessments

Senior Managers.

10. Project Category

According to the relevant requirements and experiences in the company, the project is classified based on the following predefined features.

Project Category

High

Project Categories:

C Projects:

B Projects:

A Projects:

Complexity

Low

Average

High

Risk & Impact on Company

Low

Average

High

Strategic Importance

Low

Average

High

Number of Persons on Project

Generally 5–10

Generally 10–20

Generally > 20

Project Duration

Up to six months

6–12 months

6–24 months

11. Project Budget (Overview)

The financial framework within which the project has to operate is described here. Depending on the size of the framework, it may make sense to provide further details for individual parts.

Area

Amount

Labor

$360,000

Materials

$190,000

Overheads

$50,000

Totals

$600,000

12. Project Startup

The project is deemed started with the following signatures:

Representative of Steering Committee

Customer

Project Manager

Signature

Name

Date

13. Project End

Planned Project End:

14/2/2022

a. Signatures for Release

The project manager is released with the signatures provided here following the project closing phase:

Representative of Steering Committee

Customer

Project Manager

Signature

Name

Date

Annex

I. Glossary and Abbreviations

Term

Explanation

Total Product Portfolio

Collection of all the products and services that are offered by a company.

Budget

Estimation of costs involved in a project.

Strategy

The way in which an organization desires to achieve objectives

II. References, Accompanying Documents

Reference No.

Title

Doc. No.

1.

Miguel, A., Madria, W., & Polancos, R. (2019, April). Project management model: Integrating earned schedule, quality, and risk in earned value management. In 2019 IEEE 6th International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Applications (ICIEA) (pp. 622-628). IEEE.

2.

Cha, J., Newman, M., & Winch, G. (2018). Revisiting the project management knowledge framework: Rebalancing the framework to include transformation projects. International Journal of Managing Projects in Business.

File name: Project Charter.docx Page 4 of 19 Print date 05.05.16