Sheet1
| Project 2 Rubric | ||||
| Description | Actual Points | Score | Comments | |
| Exec Summary | 1-page short description of selection and implementation | 5 | 0 | None found |
| Introduction | Short introduction explaining the document | 2.5 | 2.5 | Good background provided for the project. |
| Project Team & Project Management | Describe project team, must represent ALL constituent groups | 10 | 0 | None found |
| Vendor Selection | Process to select (e.g. what vendors were reviewed and how/why selected) | 5 | 5 | Epic vs. others appears to have been compared. |
| Project Activities & Phases | Complete project plan (beginning to end) | 10 | 0 | None found |
| Plans | ||||
| Change Management | 2.5 | 0 | None found | |
| Communication Plan | 2.5 | 0 | ||
| Data Migration from Legacy Systems | 10 | 0 | ||
| Training Plan | 10 | 0 | ||
| Test Plan | 10 | 0 | ||
| Data Visualization | 15 | 0 | ||
| Agile Incorporation into Plan | 10 | 0 | ||
| Six-sigma & Lean Focus in Plan | 10 | 0 | ||
| Approval for Go-Live | 2.5 | 0 | ||
| Go-Live (How to migrate?) | 5 | 0 | ||
| Post Go-Live Support | 5 | 0 | ||
| Recognition/Celebration Events | 5 | 0 | ||
| References | 5 | 2.5 | Only 3 references. Needed much more analysis for a 25-page, detail paper/project worth 35% of your final grade. | |
| Writing | Grammar, spelling, APA | 5 | 1 | No issues based on the 3 detail pages. However, needed 25 pages of detail - minimum. Missed this major requirement. |
| TOTAL | 125 | 11 | ||
| 9% |
1
2
3
4
5
A
B
Description
Introduction
Short introduction explaining the document
Project Team & Project
Management
Describe project team, must represent
ALL constituent groups
Project 2 Rubric