Resource Organizing
Jacky Chen
Professor Navarro
English 1A
16 October, 2021
Impacts Of Art to The World and Why It Had Been Disregarded in Many Places
Art is the expression, application, or depiction of creative ability and creativity via
visual media such as painting and sculpture. The artists have made significant contributions
to society via their work, which has resulted in a sea shift in how people see real-world
events. Nonetheless, art brings silent ideas to life and allows them to be interpreted by the rest
of the world present artists art with a purpose in mind. Various individuals perceive their
intentions and meanings differently based on their prior exposure to art, their known history,
and the historical period in which the art is exhibited. In this context, I will use chapter two of
our textbook to discuss the influence of arts on society while critically analyzing the author's
use of rhetorical devices and comparing them with " Dr. Larry Brewster and California
Arts-in-Corrections: A Case Study in Correctional Arts Research." This chapter of the book
is written by Checker and Fishman and focuses on many issues, but I will point out her
arguments on the impact of art in New York and why art had been disregarded in many
places.
The author uses rhetorical devices to appeal to us on the causes of art underestimation
in New York. Using pathos, the author appeals to our emotions by stating the ways art has
been underscoring in modern America. The author appeals to our feelings when passing
through her arguments on the importance of art in people's lives, specifically in politics. She
wants us to feel how she thinks about how art has lost its value in a modernized society. Here,
the author paints a vivid picture of how she dwelled into teaching, she needed people to "be
impacted by the theatre" (Checker and Fishman, 57). She constantly reminds us of why art
should still be embraced even after the evolution of museums and the gallery system. "This
work has underscored the many contradictions between our artistic ideas and how they have
been institutionalized since the modern era, brilliantly accounting for the art world I
experienced, with all its dissatisfactions" (Checker and Fishman, 53). Artists raised concerns
about funding organizations' propensity to quantify economic outcomes rather than recognize
aesthetic and social worth when evaluating creative initiatives piqued the author's attention.
The author uses pathos and introduces a fair share of life examples and writings to
appeal to us on how art is influential and impacts our daily lives. Also, through pathos,
Fishman points out that "consequently, the arts no longer serve as a source of inspiration or a
means of expressing concern for most people (Checker and Fishman, 53). It's not uncommon
for the author to talk about art's significance and its favorable reactions. Throughout the
chapter, she successfully uses pathos to build a sympathetic picture via emotionally charged
words and phrases. She notes that 'she sang her final song" (Checker and Fishman, 54) on the
budget and that "she left the art world" because it dismayed her. The author selected this
story as symptomatic of the Pathos device since we can all identify with these problems.
Pathos seems to be more successful than Ethos or Logos as a rhetorical technique the author
uses in certain situations. These words help establish the impacts of art in the New York
modernized society, and they are an appeal to pathos or the readers' feelings of anger and
frustration.
There are many times in the book when the author discusses the value of art and its
advantages. The author says that artists educate their pupils "that witnessing an artwork may
be an opportunity to express a point of view, to think about different concepts, and to think
critically about their surroundings" (Checker and Fishman, 66). Using this example, we can
understand how important art is while simultaneously emphasizing its seriousness. As a
result, the author imbues the work with meaning. They reassert the thesis by utilizing these
instances, making it more straightforward for the listener to relate to.
Throughout this chapter, there is a particular anchoring bias towards art's power on
teachers' lives and not a societal impact. This leads us to the second sense in which this work
is cultural activism. The author noted that several artists and directors told her that teaching
was something broader than art. Arts educators want to foster independence, self-confidence,
observation, and critical thinking in their students by teaching "creative thinking," a rigorous
cognitive process. They believe that a democratic education aims to prepare students to be
engaged citizens, which many people believe the present educational system does not
adequately prepare them to achieve. Their teaching methods thus directly challenge the
dominant educational ethos and agenda in America, which focuses on producing an
educational product, judged through relentless testing. In these hierarchical and positivist
educational approaches, some things must be known, and children are measured by whether
they can prove they know them on a test. This demonstrates that the mental dispositions and
work processes that program directors and artists teach are critical to productive and creative
thinking in any industry. Because of this, it's challenging to be impartial when discussing the
effect of the arts outside the classroom. Because of their ties, the author has a soft spot for
teaching artists and wants to learn more about it. These problems of art's impotence and
influence are also felt when people have this prejudice while discussing or writing about
other professions. The author chooses a career they are passionate about narrows the
audience's understanding of the problem.
Art's effects on people's lives and the helplessness of art and artists due to modernity
are explored in this chapter through various cause-and-effect scenarios. As an example,
consider the passage where the author discusses the relationship between art's importance in
the New York City community and its causes and effects. Cultural groups, institutions, and
artists in New York City started to fill the void (Checker and Fishman, 55). In this
cause-and-effect example, the reader will see how widespread these problems are in New
York City and how they influence art programs in the city's standard curriculum in the future.
In addition, the reader will be able to adapt the circumstances to their states or regions by
looking at them through the lens of New York City. It provides students with the opportunity
to develop and examine their own opinions on the reasons and consequences of art
curriculum inclusion — or exclusion — in their school systems.
According to the author's opinion, art education is no longer necessary, as shown by
certain schools no longer provide art classes. "Instead, they operate with the belief that
instructors and students must first gain confidence in their views and separate themselves
from authoritative interpretations to build critical perspective" (Checker and Fishman, 61).
However, throughout the chapter, the author's tone is assertive, making it appealing to
readers.
The second article is a fascinating case study that tells how an arts-correctional body
of research came to exist, and I will be brief while analyzing it rhetorically. Native American
art is one of the practices that belong to Americans' aboriginal inhabitants. Consequently, it
was mainly produced after the European contact. The native Americans knew nothing about
art and artists, but few American Indians allowed art to become part of their daily lives.
During recent times art was only recognized as an imperative significance when wealth was
the essential factor in the culture. This article uses logos to appeal to its readers by reason.
Logos are prevalent throughout this case study, as the author notes in the article's first
paragraph that this correctional arts program is among the longest-running in the country and
also has the most research behind it" (Gardner, 195). An impressive success story in
correctional arts has been the quantity and quality of AIC program assessments.
The article is a peer-reviewed article that has provided a vital contribution to the study
of the correctional art research and therefore has no biases. With a strong use of analytical
methodologies and the author having no conflict of interest with the investigation, this article
is solid. When the author says that "any study on correctional arts programs is good"
(Gardner, 199), he's using logos throughout the piece. Because of this, it is not easy to
conduct double-blind, controlled, randomized research on people who have been incarcerated
or who are on probation or parole.
Throughout the article, the author uses evidence which is a building block for solid
arguments. She uses more than ten peer-reviewed articles to conclude and analyze the data
she has at hand. In the United States and abroad, many arts-in-corrections initiatives have
been successful. For the most part, these initiatives have never been reviewed, their results
have never been quantified, and their history has never been recorded (Gardner, 194). The
discipline of correctional arts relies heavily on stories to bolster its arguments, but it lacks
reliable data to back up those arguments. Art activities are offered extensively and sporadic in
correctional facilities throughout the United States, if not regularly.
The author's tone is very inspirational. The entire article was insightful and was
explained very calmly without any biases. The author used little to no personal opinions
about the controversy as described in this article. Even though additional research has come
out after those two points were made, the general tendency remains the same. Fear of bad
outcomes, a lack of resources, or a perception of a lack of resources, and "methodological
paralysis" have all been proposed as possible reasons (Gardner, 194).
Throughout the second chapter of our textbook, Checker and Fishman, our author
appeals to our emotions on matters concerning art and society, New York, to be specific. She
uses pathos in many instances to offer a way readers can relate to the impact of art and its
powerlessness in many places through commonly held emotions. On the other hand, Gardner
uses logic throughout her case study. The art of using logos makes her readers feel smart by
using only facts to pass her arguments. The two articles appeal to their readers with the same
purpose and ideas of arts and society; however, they use a different pattern of the
organization throughout their course.
Conclusively, using logos and pathos, these articles have appealed to our emotions,
logic, and rationality on the topic of art and correctional art in California and New York. In
my opinion, these articles give readers an overview of the importance of art to the world, the
reasons why skill is underestimated, and the perspectives with which people view art. I
believe these articles were conclusive and fulfilled their hypothesis. We need individuals like
Checker and Fishman to guarantee that art continues to be taught in schools by the proper
artists since the art program was so effective that it was one of the best models of prison arts
programming in California.
References
Checker, Melissa, and Maggie Fishman. Local Actions: Cultural Activism, Power, and
Public Life in America, Columbia University Press, 2004. ProQuest Ebook
Central, https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/sjsu/detail.action?docID=909222.
Gardner Ph.D., Amanda. "Dr. Larry Brewster and California Arts-in-Corrections: A
case study in correctional arts research." Journal of Prison Education and Reentry
6.2 (2020): 194-200.