project 2

Unit Name/Code Assessment Type Report and Demo

Assessment Number 3

Assessment Name Demonstration of an interactive Prototype/Application and Report Submission

Unit Learning Outcomes Assessed

ULO2: Show a thorough understanding and assessment of the software development processes, ULO3: Display a comprehensive understanding and judgement of project management and quality processes in developing software systems

ULO4: Demonstrate comprehension and appraisal of verification, validation, and testing procedures in developing software systems

Graduate Attributes Addressed: GA1: COMMUNICATION, GA2: COLLABORATION, GA3: RESEARCH, GA4: CRITICAL THINKING AND PROBLEM SOLVING, GA5: ETHICAL BEHAVIOR, GA6: FLEXIBILITY

Graduate Attributes Addressed: GA1: COMMUNICATION, GA2: COLLABORATION, GA3: RESEARCH, GA4: CRITICAL THINKING AND PROBLEM SOLVING, GA5: ETHICAL BEHAVIOR, GA6: FLEXIBILITY

Graduate Attributes Addressed: GA1: COMMUNICATION, GA2: COLLABORATION, GA3: RESEARCH, GA4: CRITICAL THINKING AND PROBLEM SOLVING, GA5: ETHICAL BEHAVIOR, GA6: FLEXIBILITY

Due Date and Time Report: Week 7, Friday 10.05.2019 by 5 PM AEST Demo: In the workshop

Weighting 20%

Assessment Description One student in the group to submit to Moodle a MS Word document with snapshots of the front-end, backend code along with the interactive features. Demonstrate the

prototype with developed backend connectivity and working. This has to match your

A1(Assessment) prototype. Group assignment processes are monitored to verify

individual student

Detailed Submission Requirements

Upload the document via Moodle/Turnitin, one per group.

Prepare for the demo in the workshop.

Follow the instructions as required by this assessment brief.

INSTRUCTIONS You will answer oral questions based on part of the project work completed in the previous week and on the technical work done

in the current week. Each student will be quizzed about 6 times in the semester. The aim of the assessment is to encourage

student attendance on a consistent basis and also to encourage learning the implementation (HTML, JavaScript, CSS, PHP,

MySQL) skills. The implementation skills are required to get you ready for project 2 in the next semester.

NATURE OF THE TASK This is an individual assessment.

MATERIALS REQUIRED / SUGGESTED RESOURCES You may need to use many tools be ready for the viva though the tool usage is not assessed, rather the questions will be on t he

products/services created by you while using the tools. The tools required may be GitHub, Balsamiq, UML diagramming editors,

LucidChart, PHPStorm, CodeIgniter, MySQL.

HOW TO PRESENT YOUR ASSIGNMENT / SUBMISSION INSTRUCTIONS Starting from week 2, your tutor/lecturer will be asking questions in the laboratory based on the weekly documented work in the first

15 minutes of the workshop. You should refer to the document titled “AIH - ISY3002 Workshop Activities 2019T1.pdf” to learn

about the weekly workshop activities. Also refer to the document titled “AIH - Project Details ISY3002 2019T1.pdf” for your project

specifications. You will need to have rough documentation of your previous/current week’s work. The viva questions will be re lated

to the (rough) documentation provided by you. The documentation does not need to be structured or formatted but you need to be

on top of the knowledge learnt in the previous weeks.

RETENTION OF RECORDS Students are required to keep a copy of all items submitted or completed for assessment or evaluation until the end of the grade

appeal period.

INFORMATION ABOUT HOW AND WHEN FEEDBACK WILL BE PROVIDED You may be assessed every week or every alternate week depending on the availability of time. The results of each weekly

assessment will be available on completion of the viva in the workshop session. The average of the assessments over a 12-week

period will be considered as the final score.

MARKING CRITERIA

See the rubric on page 3.

Assessment

Section Requirements Weight 20% HIGH DISTINCTION 100-85%

DISTINCTION 84-75%

CREDIT 74-65%

PASS 64-50%

FAIL 49-0%

Presentation and Content 1. PPT contents 2. Structure 3. Presentation skills

Mark

6 5-6 4.5-5 4-4.5 3-4 <3

Working of Software 1. Theme 2. Correctness 3. Execution

Mark

6 5-6 4.5-5 4-4.5 3-4 <3

Report structure, Format, Grammar, Presentation and Referencing

1. Contents 2. Structure 3. relevance

8 7-8 6-7 5-6 4-5 <4

TOTAL MARK 20 Overall comments: The software will be evaluated based on working and learning.