ONLY FOR ( Michelle MalK)

profilejewles05
Project1Instructions.docx

Purpose:

The purpose of this project is for students to understand the relationship between government, business and society and demonstrate how each attempts to influence the others.  In completing this project, you will discuss the role ethics plays in business and how the actions of a business can influence society.  Government supports businesses but at the same time, government acts as a regulator and must address societal matters to ensure businesses act in a socially responsible manner. 

Outcomes Met With This Project:

· discuss the financial, economic, regulatory, sociopolitical, and technological factors as they relate to a dynamic business environment

· describe the ethical and social responsibilities that confront a business

Skill Building:

You are also completing this project to help you develop the skills of critical thinking, writing and developing a personal brand.  Writing is a critical skill because in business it is important to convey information clearly and concisely and to develop a personal brand.  Developing a personal brand is important because it is the ongoing process of establishing an image or impression in the minds of others especially those in positions above you.  Having a strong personal brand can lead to opportunities that include promotions.

Case Scenario:

Read the following case scenario and answer the questions that follow:

James Monsees and Adam Bowen, co-creators of Juul Labs has come under criticism for potentially marketing to teenagers the e-cigarette device.  Monsees did not show much concern because he believed the small percentage of underage consumers were making a lot of noise that was distracting Juul from one of the greatest advances in public health.  Believed to be safer than cigarettes, Juul devices have shown to be safer than traditional cigarettes containing fewer toxins. 

The e-cigarette has captured 70% of the market share for e-cigarettes.  A Juul that transforms a pod of nicotine-laced liquid into inhalable fumes sells for $34.99 with a pack of pods costing about $15.99.  The company’s revenue is expected to grow to $1 billion in 2018 making the value of the company worth approximately $16.3 billion. 

A major attraction of the Juul device is the variety of flavors available to smokers.  Flavors include mango, fruit, crème and cucumber, all attractive to adolescents.

The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is scrutinizing the company’s advertising to assess whether Juul has intentionally targeted teenagers.  In 2009, President Obama signed the Family Smoking Prevention and Tobacco Control Act granting the FDA the authority to regulate the marketing and sales of tobacco products to reduce adolescent tobacco use.  Although the FDA has authority over cigarettes, cigarette tobacco and smokeless tobacco, it does not have jurisdiction over e-cigarettes, cigars, and snus.  However, the FDA proposed e-cigarettes, little cigars and other products be labeled as ‘tobacco products,’ which provides regulatory jurisdiction to the FDA under the Tobacco Control Act. 

Executives at Juul have taken a position that the company did not intentionally target teenagers. Despite its statement, management at Juul admitted to knowing about the popularity of the e-cigarettes among youth.  In fact, since the release of the flash-drive shaped device in 2015, teenagers have been seen vaping Juuls. 

Since coming under scrutiny, Juul has changed it advertising to move away from using young models in their 20’s to models over 35 years of age.  This effort was to better align its advertising to the company mission to appeal to adult smokers.  In 2018, Juul Labs made another change to its advertisements that led to depicting real people who had switch from cigarettes to Juul. 

Juul Labs has an official Marketing & Social Media Code that states, “We adhere to strict guidelines to ensure that our marketing is directed toward existing adult smokers.” 

On October 1, 2018, the FDA made a surprise inspection of the headquarters of Juul Labs confiscating documents that furthered its efforts against marketing tobacco products to children.

 

Instructions:

You will use the following steps to complete this project.  Make sure to complete each step to ensure the highest possible grade.  Note that you are using the case scenario facts and the course material. External sources are not permitted.

Step 1:  Create Headings

You will use the following headings for this project.  Make sure that each heading is in place and use the headings as a guide to write each section of the project.

· Introduction

· Ethical and Legal Behavior

· Ethical and Legal Issues

· Corporate Social Responsibility

· Business, Government and Society

· Conclusion

Step 2:  Write an Introduction paragraph 

The Introduction paragraph is the first paragraph of the paper and will be used to describe to the reader the intent of the paper explaining the main points covered in the paper.  This intent should be understood prior to reading the remainder of the paper so the reader knows exactly what is being covered in the paper. 

Write the introduction last to ensure all of the main points are covered.

Step 3:  Ethical and Legal Behavior

You learned about business ethics and the nature of ethical and legal behavior in business.  You will use the course material to support your ideas and reasoning to:

· Differentiate between ethical and legal behavior. 

· Discuss whether Juul Labs is facing an ethical issue or a legal issue.  Then, identify and explain the ethical issue and/or legal issue.

Step 4:  Corporate Social Responsibility

Corporate social responsibility is about companies conducting their business in a way that is ethical.  Corporate social responsibility goes beyond taking actions that benefit external organizations or individuals but also is about improving processes and behaviors within the organization.  The answer is not reflective of what Juul did in the case scenario in response to the FDA.  The answer requires a forward thinking response.

· Explain what actions or measures Monsees and Bowen can take to ensure Juul Labs is operated as an ethical organization.

Step 5:  Business, Government and Society

In this step, you will analyze the role of business, government in relation to society using both the case scenario and the course material. 

· Explain how society influences business through government activity.

Step 6: Conclusion 

Write a concluding paragraph that is brief and summarizes the main points.  Provide specific information related to the major topics discussed in the paper.   

Step 7:  Review the Paper 

Read the paper to ensure all required elements are present.  In conjunction with these instructions, use the grading rubric to ensure that you gain the most points possible for this assignment. 

Proofread the paper for spelling and grammatical issues, and third person writing. 

· Read the paper aloud as a first measure;

· Use the spell and grammar check in Word as a second measure;

· Consider submitting the paper to the Effective Writing Center (EWC).  The EWC will provide 4-6 areas that may need improvement.

Step 7:  Submit the paper in the Assignment Folder (The assignment submitted to the Assignment Folder will be considered the student's final product and therefore ready for grading by the instructor.  It is incumbent upon the student to verify the assignment is the correct submission.  No exceptions will be considered by the instructor). 

How to Set Up the Paper

Create a Word or Rich Text Format (RTF) document that is double-spaced, 12-point font.  The final product will be no longer than 2 and one-half pages in length excluding the title page and reference page.  Write clearly and concisely.

Completing the Paper 

In order to complete this project, you will want to first read the module, Learn How to Support What You Write, as this assignment requires you to use the course readings and research to support what you write.  Also,

· Read and use the grading rubric while completing the exercise to ensure all requirements are met that will lead to the highest possible grade.  

· Third person writing is required.  Third person means that there are no words such as “I, me, my, we, or us” (first person writing), nor is there use of “you or your” (second person writing).  If uncertain how to write in the third person, view this link:  http://www.quickanddirtytips.com/education/grammar/first-second-and-third-person

· Contractions are not used in business writing, so do not use them.  

· Paraphrase and do not use direct quotation marks.  Paraphrase means you do not use more than four consecutive words from a source document.  Instead put a passage from a source document into your own words and attribute the passage to the source document.  Not using direct quotation marks means that there should be no passages with quotation marks and instead the source material is paraphrased as stated above.  Note that a reference within a reference list cannot exist without an associated in-text citation and vice versa.   You may not use more than four consecutive words from a source document, as doing so would require direct quotation marks.  Changing words from a passage does not exclude the passage from having quotation marks.   If more than four consecutive words are used from source documents, this material will not be included in the grade and could lead to allegations of academic dishonesty.

· You are expected to use the case scenarios and weekly course material to develop the analysis and support the reasoning.   There should be a robust use of the course material along with thorough analysis of potential location information.  Material used from a source document must be cited and referenced.  A reference within a reference list cannot exist without an associated in-text citation and vice versa.  Changing words from a passage does not exclude the passage from having quotation marks.   If more than four consecutive words are used from source documents, this material will not be included in the grade and could lead to allegations of academic dishonesty.

· Use in-text citations and provide a reference list that contains the reference associated with each in-text citation.

· The only book you may use is the course eBook.  This project only allows you to use the course material.  You may not use any external sources including a dictionary or Wikipedia.

· Provide the page or paragraph number in every in-text citation presented.  If the eBook does not have pages, provide the chapter title and topic heading. 

 

Self-Plagiarism: Self-plagiarism is the act of reusing significant, identical or nearly identical portions of one's own work.  You cannot re-use any portion of a paper or other graded work that was submitted to another class even if you are retaking this course.   You also will not reuse any portion of previously submitted work in this class.  A zero will be assigned to the assignment if self-plagiarized.  Faculty donot have the discretion to accept self-plagiarized work.

Due Date

Apr 6, 2019 11:59 PM

Hide Rubrics

Rubric Name: Project 1 (15%)

This table lists criteria and criteria group name in the first column. The first row lists level names and includes scores if the rubric uses a numeric scoring method.Criteria 1

Above Average

Sufficient

Developing

Needs Improvement

Failure

Introduction

0.6 points

Writes an introduction that captures the reader's attention, gives context to the paper, and builds to the thesis that defines the main points to be discussed in the paper.  

(0.54 - 0.6)

0.51 points

Writes an introduction that provides context to the paper and presents the thesis statement that defines the main points to be discussed in the paper. 

(0.48 - 0.539)

0.45 points

Writes an introduction that provides a general context to the paper or the thesis is vague or underdeveloped.

(0.42 - 0.479)

0.39 points

Attempts to write an introduction but has little to no context to the paper and the thesis is missing main points or no thesis statement provided.  

(0.36 - 0.419)

0 points

No attempt at presenting an introduction.

(0 - 0.359)

/ 0.6

Ethical and Legal behavior

2.55 points

Correctly and thoroughly differentiates between ethical and legal behavior in regards to Juul Labs 

providing a thorough use of the course material  AND case scenario facts to support reasoning and conclusions. 

(2.295 - 2.55)

2.1675 points

Correctlydifferentiates between ethical and legal behavior in regards to Juul Labs using both case scenario facts AND  course material to support reasoning and conclusions but needs some additional development.

(2.04 - 2.294)

1.9125 points

Attempts todifferentiate between ethical and legal behavior in regards to Juul Labs providing some use of the course material  AND case scenario facts  to support reasoning and conclusions but needs significant development or one of the explanations is incorrectly presented.

(1.785 - 2.03)

1.6575 points

Attempts todifferentiate between ethical and legal behavior in regards to Juul Labsproviding little use of the course material AND  case scenario facts to support reasoning and conclusions OR uses either course material or case scenario facts but not both. 

(1.53 - 1.784)

0 points

Fails to differentiate between ethical and legal behavior in regards to Juul Labs or all explanations are incorrectly presented.

(0 - 1.52)

/ 2.55

Ethical Issue

2.55 points

Correctly and thoroughlyiscusses whether Juul Labs is facing an ethical issue or a legal issue and correctly identifies and explains the ethical issue

providing a thorough use of the course material  AND case scenario facts to support reasoning and conclusions. 

(2.295 - 2.55)

2.1675 points

Correctly discusses whether Juul Labs is facing an ethical issue or a legal issue and correctly identifies and explains the ethical issue using both case scenario facts  AND course material to support reasoning and conclusions but needs some additional development.

(2.04 - 2.294)

1.9125 points

Attempts to discuss whether Juul Labs is facing an ethical issue or a legal issue and correctly identifies and explains the ethical issue providing some use of the course material  AND case scenario facts  to support reasoning and conclusions but needs significant development or one of the explanations is incorrectly presented.

(1.785 - 2.03)

1.6575 points

Attempts to discuss whether Juul Labs is facing an ethical issue or a legal issue and correctly identifies and explains the ethical issue providing little use of the course material AND case scenario facts to support reasoning and conclusions  OR uses either course material or case scenario facts but not both.

(1.53- 1.784)

0 points

Fails to discuss whether Juul Labs is facing an ethical issue or a legal issue and correctly identifies and explains the ethical issue or allexplanations are incorrectly presented.

(0 - 1.52)

/ 2.55

Actions or measures Monsees and Bowen can take to ensure Juul Labs is operated as an ethical organization.

2.55 points

Correctly and thoroughlyexplains what actions or measures Monsees and Bowen can take to ensure Juul Labs is operated as an ethical organization

providing a thorough use of the course material  AND  case scenario facts to support reasoning and conclusions. 

(2.295 - 2.55)

2.1675 points

Correctly  providing some use of the course material  and research to support reasoning and conclusions but needs some additional development.

Correctly explains what actions or measures Monsees and Bowen can take to ensure Juul Labs is operated as an ethical organization using both case scenario facts  AND  course material to support reasoning and conclusions but needs some additional development.

(2.04 - 2.294)

1.9125 points

Attempts to explain what actions or measures Monsees and Bowen can take to ensure Juul Labs is operated as an ethical organizationproviding some use of the course material AND  case scenario facts  to support reasoning and conclusions but needs significant development or one of the explanations is incorrectly presented.

(1.785 - 2.03)

1.6575 points

Attempts to explain what actions or measures Monsees and Bowen can take to ensure Juul Labs is operated as an ethical organizationproviding little use of the course material AND  case scenario facts to support reasoning and conclusions  OR  uses either course material or case scenario facts but not both.

(1.53 - 1.784)

0 points

Fails to explain what actions or measures Monsees and Bowen can take to ensure Juul Labs is operated as an ethical organization. OR all explanations are incorrectly presented.

 

(0 - 1.52)

/ 2.55

How society influences business through government activity.

2.55 points

Correctly and thoroughlyexplains how society influences business through government activity

providing a thorough use of the course material  AND case scenario facts to support reasoning and conclusions. 

(2.295 - 2.55)

2.1675 points

Correctly explains how society influences business through government activityusing both case scenario facts  AND  course material to support reasoning and conclusions but needs some additional development.

(2.04 - 2.294)

1.9125 points

Attempts to explain how society influences business through government activityproviding some use of the course material  AND  case scenario facts  to support reasoning and conclusions but needs significant development or one of the explanations is incorrectly presented.

(1.785 - 2.03)

1.6575 points

Attempts to explainhow society influences business through government activity providing little use of the course material  AND  case scenario facts to support reasoning and conclusions OR uses either course material or case scenario facts but not both.

(1.53 - 1.784)

0 points

Fails to explains how society influences business through government activity.

(0 - 1.52)

/ 2.55

Conclusion

0.45 points

In a clear and concise manner, comprehensively concludes the paper by restating/ summarizing the argument.  Refer to the opening statements and main points made throughout the paper.  Reflect on the importance of the arguments and conclude their development.

(0.405 - 0.45)

0.3825 points

In a clear manner concludes the paper by restating/ summarizing the argument.  Refer to the main points made throughout the paper.  Attempts to reflect on the importance of the arguments but further development of the main points of the paper is needed. 

(0.36 - 0.404)

0.3375 points

Concludes the paper by somewhat restating/ summarizing the argument.  Attempts to bring in some explanation of the general idea of the main points of the paper.

(0.315 - 0.35)

0.2925 points

Attempts to restate/summarize the argument but explanations are irrelevant to the main points of the paper. 

(0.27 - 0.314)

0 points

Fails to present restatement/summarization of argument.

(0 - 0.26)

/ 0.45

This table lists criteria and criteria group name in the first column. The first row lists level names and includes scores if the rubric uses a numeric scoring method.Criteria 4

Above Average

Sufficient

Developing

Needs Improvement

Failure

Attention to Instructions

1.5 points

The paper contains all major assignment tasks.  The paper also includes completion of all minor aspects of the assignment such as third person writing, required use of course readings, outside sources if needed, and assignment format.

(1.35 - 1.5)

1.275 points

The paper contains all major assignment tasks.  The paper missed one minor aspects of the assignment such as third person writing, required use of course readings, outside sources if needed, and assignment format. 

(1.2 - 1.34)

1.125 points

One major assignment tasks or two minor aspects of the assignment missed.

(1.05 - 1.19)

0.0975 points

Two major assignment tasks and/or three or more minor aspects of the assignments missed.

(0.9 - 1.04)

0 points

Three or more major assignment tasks missed.

(0 - 0.89)

/ 1.5

Writing Mechanics

1.5 points

Strictly adheres to standard usage rules of written English using paragraphs and sentence rather than bullets, including but not limited to capitalization, punctuation, run-on sentences, missing or extra words, stylistic errors, spelling and grammatical errors. No contractions or jargon used.  Zero to two errors noted.

(1.35 - 1.5)

1.275 points

Excellently adheres to standard usage of mechanics: conventions of written English, including capitalization, punctuation, and spelling. Three to six errors noted.

(1.2 - 1.34)

1.125 points

Satisfactorily adheres to standard usage rules of mechanics: conventions of English, including capitalization, punctuation, and spelling. Seven to 10 errors noted.

(1.05 - 1.19)

0.0975 points

Minimally adheres to standard usage rules of mechanics: conventions of written English, including capitalization, punctuation, and spelling. More than 10 errors found.

(0.9 - 1.04)

0 points

Does not adhere to standard usage rules of mechanics: conventions of written English largely incomprehensible, or errors are too plentiful to count.

(0 – 0.89)

/ 1.5

This table lists criteria and criteria group name in the first column. The first row lists level names and includes scores if the rubric uses a numeric scoring method.Criteria 5

Above Average

Sufficient

Developing

Needs Improvement

Failure

Adherence to APA (6th ed.)

0.75 points

One to 2 APA style or usage errors; Proper citation of source material is used throughout paper; Reference titles follow APA with only the first word, the first word after a colon and proper nouns capitalized.

(0.675 - 0.75)

0.6375 points

Attempts in-text citations and reference list but 3 - 4 APA style errors noted or fails to use APA citations when appropriate 1-2 times.

(0.6 - 0.674)

0.5625 points

Attempts in-text citations and reference lists; APA style errors are noted throughout document with 5-6 errors noted; Fails to use APA citations when appropriate 3 - 4 times in document.

(0.525 - 0.59)

0.475 points

Attempts in-text citations and reference lists; Fails to use APA citation when appropriate 5-6 times; Fails to use APA citations when appropriate 5-6 times in document or presents a total of 1-2 in-text citations and reference list in a paper when requires APA citations are needed throughout the document.

(0.45 - 0.524)