Audit Assignment with Tableau

Ranges

90 – 100%

80 – 89%

79 – 0%

Criteria

Exceeds Performance Expectations 12.125 points

Meets Performance Expectations 10.813 points

Does Not Meet Performance Expectations 9.75 points

Communication

Clear, correct, and concise use of English grammar with no spelling or punctuation errors. Employs professional writing without colloquial language. Organization is easy to follow and congruent with graduate level writing skills.

Clear, correct, and concise use of English grammar with some spelling and/or punctuation errors. Employs professional writing with some colloquial language. Organization is not easy to follow but the submission is written at the graduate level.

Confusing, incorrect, and or wordy use of English grammar with many spelling and or punctuation errors. Employs unprofessional writing with a significant amount of colloquial language. Organization is not easy to follow, and the submission is not written at the graduate level. Or, did not submit.

Critical thinking

Clearly identified explained the main issues, questions, or problems under critical consideration.

Accessed more than enough information to investigate the issues or problems.

Evaluated the information in a logical and organized manner to determine its value and relevance. Considered and analyzed information in context to the issue or problem.

Developed outstanding ideas, conclusions or decisions, and checked them against the most relevant criteria and benchmarks.

Adequately identified and explained the main issues, questions, or problems under critical consideration.

Accessed sufficient information to investigate the issues or problems.

Evaluated most of the information in a logical and organized manner to determine its value and relevance. Considered and analyzed most of the information in context to the issue or problem.

Developed well-reasoned ideas, conclusions or decisions, and may have checked them against relevant criteria and benchmarks.

Did not clearly identify explained the main issues, questions, or problems under critical consideration.

May not have accessed an sufficient amount of information to investigate the issues or problems.

Did not use a logical and organized manner to determine the value and relevance of information. May have considered and analyzed information but not in the context of the issue or problem.

Did not develop well-reasoned ideas, conclusions or decisions, and may not have checked them against relevant criteria and benchmarks. Or, did not submit.

Risk Assessment, Analysis, and Management

Correctly identifies & provides accurate & detailed descriptions of the most relevant & serious issues, challenges, and/or problems facing the company. Shows superior knowledge of the company's current financial situation & strategic issues. Provides a focused diagnosis of the issue(s) & justifies that diagnosis using evidence presented in the case.

Correctly identifies & provides accurate & detailed descriptions for some of the most relevant & serious issues, challenges, and/or problems facing the company. Shows above average knowledge of the company's current financial situation & strategic issues. Provides a focused diagnosis of some of the issue(s) & justifies that diagnosis using some evidence presented in the case.

Does not correctly identify & provide accurate & detailed descriptions for most of the most relevant & serious issues, challenges, and/or problems facing the company. Shows below average knowledge of the company's current financial situation & strategic issues. Does not provides a focused diagnosis of some of the issue(s) & does not justifies that diagnosis using evidence presented in the case. Or, did not submit.

Reporting

Identified all of the appropriate content to report and used the report template provided in the project. Provided more than enough information to satisfy the reporting requirement.

Identified most of the appropriate content to report and used the report template provided in the project. Provided enough information to satisfy the reporting requirement.

Identified some of the appropriate content to report and may or may not have used the report template provided in the project. Did not provide enough information to satisfy the reporting requirement. Or, did not submit.

Technology and Tools

Demonstrated use of Tableau at a high level of proficiency and contributed to helping others in the online discussion group to learn it too.

Demonstrated use of Tableau at a moderate level of proficiency. Was proactive about seeking help from others in the online discussion group.

Demonstrated use of Tableau at a low level of proficiency. Was not proactive about seeking help from others in the online discussion group. Or, did not submit.

Governance perspective

Correctly identified all of the relevant issues, standards and guidance. Indicates an exceptional understanding of the topic (connecting it with our readings or other sources).

Correctly identified an adequate amount of the relevant primary issue(s). Indicates a satisfactory understanding of the topic.

Did not identify the relevant primary issue(s).  Or did not submit. Indicates a limited understanding of the topic, reflecting what other students have already posted or repeating information that was in the assigned project. Or, did not submit.

Professional behavior

Clear evidence of originality.  Quoted content includes quotation marks and correct APA in-text citation including the page or paragraph number depending on the format of the source. Non-quoted content that needs to be cited provides correct APA in-text citation.  The reference list includes cited sources only.  There is no evidence of copying and pasting or other types of plagiarism.

Clear evidence of originality.  Quoted content includes quotation marks and an in-text citation that may contain errors or fail to include the page or paragraph number. Non-quoted content that needs to be cited, provides a mostly-accurate APA in-text citation.  The reference list includes cited sources and may erroneously include sources that were not cited.  There is no evidence of copying and pasting and or other types of plagiarism.

Lacks clear evidence of original thoughts.  May contain too many quotations thus rendering the paper a series of quotes and not a reflection of what the student thought about and wrote.  May include inaccurate in-text citations.  The reference list may erroneously include sources that were not cited, contain APA formatting errors, and or failed to provide the source for cited content. May contain evidence of copying and pasting and or other types of plagiarism.  Or, did not submit.

Decision Making

Develops effective recommendations, solutions, and/or action plans that specifically solve the strategic issues, challenges, and/or problems identified as the organization's most relevant & serious. Supports recommendation with convincing evidence.

Develops some effective recommendation(s) solutions, and/or action plans that specifically solve the strategic issues, challenges, and/or problems identified as the organization's most relevant & serious. Supports recommendation(s) with insufficient and unconvincing evidence.

Develops only a few effective recommendation(s) solutions, and/or action plans that only tangentially address the strategic issues, challenges, and/or problems identified as the organization's most relevant & serious. Does not support recommendation(s) with convincing evidence. Or, did not submit.

Criteria

Exceeds Performance Expectations 3 points

Meets Performance Expectations 2.5 points

Does Not Meet Performance Expectations 1 point

Collaboration

Participated in the online discussion group in a stellar way.

Participated in the online discussion group in a meaningful way.

Did not participate in the online discussion group in a meaningful way. Or, did not participate.

Overall Score

Exceeds Performance Expectation 90% to 100%

Meets Performance Expectation 80% to 89%

Does Not Meet Performance Expectation 0 to 79%