Peer Editing task

Criteria

Levels of Achievement

Peer

Score

Instructor

Score

Novice

Competent

Proficient

Quality of Information

0–7

Information has little or no relation to assigned developmental stage of the Project Paper or is from non-professional sources.

8–9

Information clearly relates to the developmental stage of the Project Paper. The information provided lacks supporting details from the professional literature.

10

Information clearly relates to the practicum and clearly fits with the assigned developmental stage. It includes several supporting details from published professional literature.

Organization

0–7

The information appears to be disorganized and not formatted to according to current AMA style.

8–9

Information is organized, but paragraphs are not well-constructed of are not properly format to comply with current AMA style.

10

Information is very organized with well-constructed paragraphs and correctly formatted to fit current AMA style.

Content

0–7

The required elements of the Project Paper are not addressed satisfactorily.

8–9

The required elements of the Project Paper are generally, but not comprehensively, addressed; and all or most questions are answered.

10

The required elements of the Project Paper are fully addressed and/or all questions are answered.

Criteria

Levels of Achievement

Peer

Score

Instructor Score

Novice

Competent

Proficient

Sources

0–7

Sources are not accurately documented or formatted.

8-9

All sources (information and graphics) are accurately documented, but some are not in current AMA format.

10

The required number of sources for the stage is cited and is accurately documented in current AMA format. For the results stage figures and tables are cited accurately.

Mechanics

0–7

Many grammatical, spelling, or punctuation errors.

8-9

A few grammatical, spelling, or punctuation errors.

10

Minimal or no grammatical, spelling, or punctuation errors.

Totals

/50

/50

Editor’s Comments:

Instructor’s Comments: