Translation Science Project Guidelines

profiletita
Project.docx

Translation Science Project Guidelines

Purpose

The purpose of this assignment is to develop a translation science project to support practice change. Evidence translation is essential to drive actions and decisions to improve healthcare outcomes. Formulation of a comprehensive translation science project supports the professional formation of the DNP scholar.

Course Outcomes

This assignment enables the student to meet the following course outcomes:

· CO1: Assess the impact of informatics and information technology on organizational systems, change, and improvement. (PO6)

· CO2: Use information technology to collect and analyze data to generate evidence-based nursing practice across healthcare settings. (PO7)

· CO3: Design programs that monitor and evaluate outcomes of care, care systems, and quality improvement. (PO7)

PREPARING THE ASSIGNMENT:

In order to create flexible options, we are providing you options on your Week 4 Translation Science Project Assignment that focuses on your practice project idea. Concept maps are an effective way to express complex ideas, especially for visual learners. For this assignment, each of the following sections can be presented either as a narrative or as a concept map:

· Practice Problem/PICOT Question

· Evidence Synthesis of Literature to Address Practice Problem

· Appraisal of the Evidence to Address Selected Problem

· Translation Path

Please note that you are not required to complete any or all sections as a concept map. If you choose to use a concept map for a section, it should be created in Microsoft Word and placed in that section of your paper. The concept map must meet all the requirements of the assignment rubric for that section. The rubric and page length requirements of the paper are unchanged.

Follow these guidelines when completing each component of this assignment. Contact your course faculty if you have questions.

1. The assignment should be no less than 6 pages and no more than 8 pages (excluding title and reference pages and appended evidence tables).

2. The assignment will include the following components:

a. Title Page

b. Introduction

i. Purpose Statement

ii. Practice Problem Identification

iii. Role of Evidence to Address the Selected Practice Problem.

iv. Role of the DNP Practice Scholar in Evidence Translation

c. Practice Problem and Question (Narrative or Conceptual Map)

i. Significance

ii. Prevalence

iii. Economic Ramifications

iv. Practice Problem Question in PICOT Format

d. Evidence Synthesis of Literature to Address the Selected Practice Problem (Narrative or Conceptual Map)

i. Scope of the Evidence Synthesis

ii. Main Points of Each Source

iii. Comparison of Main Points across Sources

e. Appraisal of the Evidence to Address the Selected Practice Problem (Narrative or Conceptual Map)

i. Level of Evidence

ii. Quality Rating of Evidence

iii. Suitability of the Evidence to Address the Selected Practice Problem

f. Translation Path (Narrative or Conceptual Map)

i. Potential Internal Factors for Consideration

ii. Potential External Factors for Consideration

iii. Selected Translation or Change Model

iv. Evaluation Plan

v. Anticipated Outcomes

vi. Strategies for Sustainability

g. Conclusion

i. Summation of the Impact of the Practice Problem

ii. Role of the Appraisal of Evidence to Address the Selected Practice Problem.

iii. Summation of the Role of the DNP Practice Scholar in Evidence Translation

h. Summary Tables of Evidence to Address the Selected Practice Problem using the  Johns Hopkins Nursing Evidence-Based Practice Evidence Summary Tool (Links to an external site.)

i. Provides four (4) sources of evidence to address the practice problem.

b. APA Style and Organization

ix. APA Standards for Scholarly Papers

· Level I Headings for the Following

· Practice Problem and Question

· Evidence Synthesis of Literature

· Appraisal of the Evidence

· Translation Path into Practice

· Conclusion

· References

· Summary Tables of the Evidence

x. Grammar and Mechanics

xi. Paper is 6-8 Pages (excluding Title and Reference Pages and appended Summary Tables)

xii. Uses Required Evidence Summary Table

Rubric

Translation Science Project

Criteria

Ratings

Pts

Introduction

Requirements: 1. Includes a focused purpose statement. 2. Identifies selected practice problem in general terms. 3. Discusses the role of evidence to address the selected practice problem. 4. Identifies the role of the DNP practice scholar in evidence translation.

20 pts

Highest Level of Performance

Includes no fewer than 4 requirements

18 pts

Very Good or High Level of Performance

Includes no fewer than 3 requirements

16 pts

Acceptable Level of Performance

Includes no fewer than 2 requirements.

0 pts

Failing Level of Performance

Includes 1 or fewer requirements.

20 pts

Implications of the Practice Problem

Requirements: 1. Describes the significance of the practice problem. 2. Discusses the prevalence of the practice problem. 3. Discusses the economic ramifications of the practice problem. 4. States Practice Problem Question in PICOT Format.

40 pts

Highest Level of Performance

Includes no fewer than 4 requirements

36 pts

Very Good or High Level of Performance

Includes no fewer than 3 requirements

32 pts

Acceptable Level of Performance

Includes no fewer than 2 requirements.

0 pts

Failing Level of Performance

Includes 1 or fewer requirements.

40 pts

Evidence Synthesis of Literature

Requirements: 1. Describes the scope of the evidence synthesis. 2. Discusses the main points of each source. 3. Compares main points across sources.

40 pts

Highest Level of Performance

Includes no fewer than 3 requirements

36 pts

Very Good or High Level of Performance

Includes no fewer than 2 requirements

32 pts

Acceptable Level of Performance

Includes no less than 1 requirement.

0 pts

Failing Level of Performance

No requirements for this section presented.

40 pts

Appraisal of the Evidence

Requirements: 1. Describes the levels of evidence. 2. Discusses the quality of evidence 3. Discusses the suitability of the evidence to address the practice problem.

40 pts

Highest Level of Performance

Includes no fewer than 3 requirements

36 pts

Very Good or High Level of Performance

Includes no fewer than 2 requirements

32 pts

Acceptable Level of Performance

Includes no less than 1 requirement.

0 pts

Failing Level of Performance

No requirements for this section presented.

40 pts

Translation Path

Requirements: 1. Identifies potential internal factors impacting the translation of evidence. 2. Identifies potential external factors impacting the translation of evidence. 3. Describes the selected translation/change model. 4. Describes an evaluation plan of the translation of evidence. 5. Discusses anticipated outcomes of the translation of evidence. 6. Describes strategies for sustainability.

40 pts

Highest Level of Performance

Includes no fewer than 6 requirements.

36 pts

Very Good or High Level of Performance

Includes no fewer than 5 requirements

32 pts

Acceptable Level of Performance

Includes no fewer than 4 requirements.

0 pts

Failing Level of Performance

Includes 3 or fewer requirements.

40 pts

Conclusion

Requirements: 1. Includes a summation of the impact of the practice problem. 2. Includes a summation of the appraisal of evidence. 3. Includes a summation of the role of the DNP practice scholar in evidence translation.

20 pts

Highest Level of Performance

Includes no fewer than 3 requirements

18 pts

Very Good or High Level of Performance

Includes no fewer than 2 requirements

16 pts

Acceptable Level of Performance

Includes no less than 1 requirement.

0 pts

Failing Level of Performance

No requirements for this section presented.

20 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeEvidence Summary Tool

Requirements: 1. Provides a complete summary of four sources of evidence.

30 pts

Highest Level of Performance

Includes no fewer than 4 requirements.

27 pts

Very Good or High Level of Performance

Includes no fewer than 3 requirements

24 pts

Acceptable Level of Performance

Includes no fewer than 2 requirements.

0 pts

Failing Level of Performance

Includes 1 or fewer requirements.

30 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAPA Style and Organization

Requirements: 1. Uses APA Standards for Scholarly Papers. (APA format correct with no more than 1-2 minor errors and no citations missing) 2. Uses Level I Headings for the following • Practice Problem and Question • Evidence Synthesis of Literature • Appraisal of the Evidence • Translation Path into Practice • Conclusion • References • Summary Tables of the Evidence 3. Grammar and Mechanics are free of errors 4. Paper is 6-8 Pages (excluding Title and Reference Pages and appended Summary Tables) 5. Uses Required Evidence Summary Table

20 pts

Highest Level of Performance

Includes no fewer than 5 requirements

18 pts

Very Good or High Level of Performance

Includes no fewer than 4 requirements

16 pts

Acceptable Level of Performance

Includes no fewer than 3 requirements.

0 pts

Failing Level of Performance

Includes 2 or fewer requirements.

20 pts

Total Points: 250