Final Project: Design with Focus on Business Continuity Assignment

Criteria Ratings Points

Systems Design of a Secure Solution

70 to >64.0 pts

Advanced

An appropriate design is formulated that accurately reflects the analysis performed in Project: Methodology Development Analysis Assignment. Each aspect is designed, including the target of the attacks that could persist, vulnerabilities, and the controls and/or solutions. A minimum of 8 peer-reviewed sources exist (can have overlap from Project: Methodology Development Analysis Assignment if appropriate) and a minimum of 7 double-spaced, current APA-formatted pages, excluding the SAD diagrams, graphics, tables, or any other non-textual components.

64 to >40.0 pts

Proficient

An appropriate design is formulated that accurately reflects the analysis performed in Project: Methodology Development Analysis Assignment. Each aspect is designed, including the target of the attacks that could persist, vulnerabilities, the controls, and/or solutions. A minimum of 7 peer-reviewed sources exist (can have overlap from Project: Methodology Development Analysis Assignment if appropriate) and a minimum of 6 double-spaced, current APA-formatted pages, excluding the SAD diagrams, graphics, tables, or any other non-textual components.

40 to >0.0 pts

Developing

A design is formulated that only partially reflects the analysis performed in Project: Methodology Development Analysis Assignment, and/or each aspect is not designed, including the target of the attacks that could persist, vulnerabilities, and the controls and/or solutions. Less than 7 peer-reviewed sources exist (can have overlap from Project: Methodology Development Analysis Assignment if appropriate) and/or less than 6 double-spaced, current APA-formatted pages, excluding the SAD diagrams, graphics, tables, or any other non-textual components.

0 pts

Not Present

70 pts

Project: Design with Focus on Business Continuity Grading Rubric | BMIS665_D01_202140

Criteria Ratings Points

Analysis Diagrams

50 to >45.0 pts

Advanced

A minimum of 5 diagrams exist that accurately analyze a secure system, network, and/or application solution. Within EACH of the 5 diagrams, a minimum of 10 elements exist that accurately detail analysis of the environment that needs securing (Note, if 10 elements are not necessary in a diagram, add diagrams as needed to sufficiently meet this requirement). Each diagram is thoroughly developed based upon existing architecture and/or applications. Each diagram meets the associated technical requirements, programming language, notations, formatting, and modeling rules of the language (e.g. UML), industry standards for the diagram, and/or literature review. Analysis and design diagrams must have an associated industry standard that is widely accepted to be recognized (e.g. UML).

45 to >30.0 pts

Proficient

A minimum of 4 diagrams exist, and/or the diagrams do not accurately detail the environment to be analyzed. Within the diagram, a minimum of 10 elements exist that accurately detail analysis of the environment that needs securing. Each diagram is thoroughly developed based upon existing architecture and/or applications. Each diagram meets the associated technical requirements, programming language, notations, formatting, and modeling rules of the language (e.g. UML), industry standards for the diagram, and/or literature review. Analysis and design diagrams must have an associated industry standard that is widely accepted to be recognized (e.g. UML).

30 to >0.0 pts

Developing

Less than 4 diagrams exist, and/or the diagrams do not accurately detail the environment to be analyzed, and/or the minimum of 10 elements does not exist within the diagrams included, and/or design diagrams do not have an associated industry standard that is widely accepted to be recognized.

0 pts

Not Present

50 pts

Project: Design with Focus on Business Continuity Grading Rubric | BMIS665_D01_202140

Criteria Ratings Points

Business Continuity and Disaster Recovery Plan

30 to >26.0 pts

Advanced

Relevant and current research exists from scholarly, peer-reviewed, and respected journals that support a business continuity and disaster recovery plan. The final plan precisely and accurately defines BCP policy, performs a business impact analysis, outlines preventative measures, and outlines recovery and restoration.

26 to >19.0 pts

Proficient

Research exists from scholarly, peer-reviewed, and respected journals that support a business continuity and disaster recovery plan, and/or the final plan is missing 1 of the required elements, including a BCP policy, business impact analysis, preventative measurement, and/or recovery and restoration.

19 to >0.0 pts

Developing

Research is not from scholarly, peer-reviewed, and respected journals that support a business continuity and disaster recovery plan, and/or the final plan is missing 2 or more of the required elements, including a BCP policy, business impact analysis, preventative measurement, and/or recovery and restoration.

0 pts

Not Present

30 pts

Proper Current APA Formatting, Spelling, and Grammar

10 to >8.0 pts

Advanced

Proper current APA formatting is used, including a title page, proper margins, citations, organization, and an ending resources page. Proper grammar and spelling is used.

8 to >6.0 pts

Proficient

Marginal current APA formatting is used, including a title page, proper margins, citations, organization, and an ending resources page.

6 to >0.0 pts

Developing

Improper current APA formatting is used, including a title page, margins, citations, organization, and an ending resources page and/or more than 4 grammatical and spelling mistakes exist.

0 pts

Not Present

10 pts

Project: Design with Focus on Business Continuity Grading Rubric | BMIS665_D01_202140

Criteria Ratings Points

Executive Summary, Introduction, and Conclusion

15 to >13.0 pts

Advanced

The student formulates a succinct executive summary that embodies the project’s primary objectives and outcomes. The introduction constructs the purpose of the secure system and/or application proposal. A compelling and arguable final conclusion is developed.

13 to >8.0 pts

Proficient

The student formulates a succinct executive summary that embodies some of the project’s primary objectives and outcomes, and/or the introduction constructs an unclear purpose of the secure system and/or application proposal. An arguable final conclusion is developed.

8 to >0.0 pts

Developing

The student formulates a generalized executive summary that embodies some of the project’s primary objectives and outcomes, and/or the introduction constructs an unclear purpose of the secure system and/or application proposal, and/or the conclusion is not arguable.

0 pts

Not Present

15 pts

Total Points: 175

Project: Design with Focus on Business Continuity Grading Rubric | BMIS665_D01_202140