Master's level Educational Psychology Program Evaluation Proposal

Print

Program Evaluation Proposal Scoring Guide

Program Evaluation Proposal Scoring Guide

Criteria	Non-performance	Basic	Proficient	Distinguished
Revise a needs analysis based on feedback and information from readings.	Does not revise a needs analysis.	Revises a needs analysis but does not adequately address faculty feedback.	Revises a needs analysis based on feedback and information from readings.	Revises a needs analysis based on feedback and information from readings, as well as further independent reflection or significant improvements in writing.
Create a plan for collecting appropriate data supported by clear rationale.	Does not discuss ways to collect evaluation data.	Discusses ways to collect evaluation data.	Creates a plan for collecting appropriate data supported by clear rationale.	Uses explicit criteria to evaluate which data is appropriate to collect and creates a clear and actionable plan for collecting it.
Create a plan for data analysis supported by clear rationale.	Does not plan methods of data analysis.	Plans methods of data analysis, but they are not supported by clear rationale.	Creates a plan for data analysis supported by clear rationale.	Evaluates options for data analysis, supports chosen methods with clear rationale, and plans clear steps for analysis.
Plan ways to collaborate with others to complete necessary research and evaluation.	Does not plan ways to collaborate with others to complete necessary research and evaluation.	Makes incomplete or inadequate plans to collaborate with others to complete necessary research and evaluation.	Plans ways to collaborate with others to complete necessary research and evaluation.	Evaluates alternatives to plan ways to collaborate with others to complete necessary research and evaluation.
Analyze best standards and criteria for evaluating a program.	Does not describe standards and criteria for evaluating a program.	Describes standards and criteria for evaluating a program.	Analyzes best standards and criteria for evaluating a program.	Develops and applies explicit criteria to evaluate the best standards and criteria for evaluating a program.
Write clearly, with correct spelling, grammar, syntax, and good organization.	Does not write clearly, and there are errors in spelling, grammar, syntax, and organization.	Writes clearly overall, but there are some errors in spelling, grammar, syntax, or organization.	Writes clearly, with correct spelling, grammar, syntax, and good organization.	Writes concisely with excellent clarity and organization, with no errors in spelling, grammar or syntax, and employing critical or analytical reasoning as needed.
Comply with APA guidelines for style and formatting.	Does not use APA format and style.	Uses APA format and style but inconsistently and with errors.	Complies with APA guidelines with few minor errors.	Complies with APA guidelines consistently with no errors.