|
Program Summary
(70%; 53 points)
|
(15 - 17 points)
A clear summary of the program is presented that demonstrates mastery of the subject matter and includes as a minimum the goals, major components, theoretical constructs, treatments, and target population of the program
|
(14 points)
A clear summary of the program is presented that demonstrates understanding of the subject matter and includes as a minimum the goals, major components, theoretical constructs, treatments, and target population of the program
|
(1 – 13 points)
The summary does not include the minimum items listed and or is missing key components of the program.
|
0 points
Not present
|
|
Logic Model
|
(16 - 18 points)
The logic model is presented using the template provided or other suitable means. The logic model includes in inputs, outputs (activities and population), and the intended outcomes. Presentation demonstrates mastery of the content and is consistent with the program.
|
(15 points)
The logic model is presented using the template provided or other suitable means. The logic model includes in inputs, outputs (activities and population), and the intended outcomes. Presentation demonstrates understanding of the content and some items may be in the wrong category.
|
(1 – 14 points)
Significant issues were noted with one or more of the following…
The presentation is not well organized and is difficult to follow
Inputs, outputs and intended outcomes are either missing or inconsistent with the program.
|
0 points
Not present
|
|
Plan for Program Evaluation
|
(16- 18 points)
The plan for evaluation demonstrates mastery of the subject matter and includes…
Plan is consistent with Program Summary and Logic Model
Variables identified
Instrument identified and described
Data collection and analysis discussed
At least 2 measurable variables were given
At least 1 of the variables was measured with a formal instrument.
|
(15 points)
The plan for evaluation demonstrates understanding of the subject matter and some issues may be present in the following…
Plan is consistent with Program Summary and Logic Model
Variables identified
Instrument identified and described
Data collection and analysis discussed
At least 2 measurable variables were given
At least 1 of the variables was measured with a formal instrument.
|
(1-14 points)
The plan for evaluation has significant issues with one or more of the following…
Plan is not consistent with Program Summary or Logic Model
Variables are not identified
Instrument is not identified or described
Data collection and analysis is not discussed
2 measurable variables were not identified
Variables can not be measured with a formal instrument
|
0 points
Not present
|
|
(30%; 22 points)
|
(20-22 points)
Writing is clear, concise, and has a logical flow
Grammar, sentence structure, and spelling are correct
Current APA guidelines are followed
All assertions and statements of fact are supported by citations of course texts or peer-reviewed sources.
|
(18-19 points)
Some issues with writing being clear, concise, and having a logical flow
Some issues with grammar, sentence structure, and spelling
Some issues with current APA guidelines being followed
Most assertions and statements of fact are supported by citations of course texts or peer-reviewed sources.
|
(1 – 17 points)
Significant issues with writing being clear, concise, and having a logical flow
Significant issues with grammar, sentence structure, and spelling
Significant issues with APA guidelines
Most assertions and statements of fact are not supported by citations of course texts or peer-reviewed sources.
|
0 points
Not present
|
n33dpap3rs
ProgramEvaluationCOUN515_Standardized_Rubric.docx
0
