Gym and Fitness Centre Industry Report in Australia

Professional Report: Part 1 [Industry Analysis]: 25%

The report assesses unit learning outcomes (ULO) 2 and 4. ULO 2 - Explain the application of key business concepts to the specific workplace context. ULO 4 - Evaluate the role of self-reflection in the development of skills for competent professional practice. To determine student performance against these ULOs the following standards will be assessed: Application of Discipline Knowledge (DK) for ULO 2 - Graduates will be able to demonstrate and apply discipline knowledge and skills. Critical Thinking (CT) for ULO 4 – Critical thinking is a habit of mind characterised by the comprehensive exploration of issues, ideas, artefacts, and events before accepting or formulating an opinion or conclusion.

Levels of Achievement

Criteria Below Expectations (Fail) 0-49

Meets Expectations (Pass) 50-59

Meets Expectations (Credit) 60-69

Exceeds Expectations (Distinction) 70- 79

Exceeds Expectations (High Distinction) 80- 100

Analysis of data (DK)

0 to 49 % Did not sufficiently analyse data from available sources using the prescribed methods to create usable information about the industry.

50 to 59 % Can apply prescribed methods to analyse data from available sources to create useable information about the industry.

60 to 69 % Can apply prescribed methods to analyse data from available sources to create useful information about the industry.

70 to 79 % Can select and apply appropriate methods to analyse data from available sources to create useful information about the industry.

80 to 100 % Can select and apply the most appropriate methods to analyse data from available sources to create useful information about the industry.

Issues (CT 0 to 49 % The issue to be considered critically in the report is not clearly stated and described. There are significant omissions and/or errors in the report.

50 to 59 % The issue to be considered critically in the report is stated clearly and described with enough information for an adequate understanding. There are some omissions and/or errors in the report.

60 to 69 % The issue to be considered critically in the report is stated clearly and described with enough information for an adequate understanding. There are no omissions and/or errors.

70 to 79 % The issue to be considered critically in the report is stated clearly and described thoroughly.

80 to 100 % The issue to be considered critically in the report is stated clearly and described comprehensively (delivering all relevant information necessary for a full understanding).

Evidence-based Analysis (CT)

0 to 49 % The industry overview is not coherent and is based on irrelevant information, concepts and methods. The analysis is based on very limited source(s).

50 to 59 % A coherent industry overview is based on partial use of relevant information, concepts and methods. The information analysed is gathered from several, relevant source(s).

60 to 69 % A coherent industry overview is based on thorough use of relevant information, concepts and methods. The information analysed is gathered from several, very relevant source (s).

70 to 79 % A coherent and comprehensive industry overview is based on thorough use of the most relevant information, concepts and methods The information analysed is gathered from many diverse, high quality source(s).

80 to 100 % A coherent and complete industry overview is based on complete use of all relevant information, concepts and methods The information analysed is gathered from many diverse, high quality source(s).

Conclusions and/or Recommendations (DK)

0 to 49 % States general conclusions and/or recommendations which are not fully supported by the analysis and development of the industry overview.

50 to 59 % Draws limited conclusions and/or recommendations which follow logically from the analysis and development of explicit elements in the industry overview.

60 to 69 % Draws conclusions and/or recommendations which follow logically from the analysis and development of explicit elements in the industry overview.

70 to 79 % Draws conclusions and/or recommendations which follow logically from the analysis and development of all explicit and some implicit elements evident in the industry overview.

80 to 100 % Draws conclusions and/or recommendations which follow logically from the analysis and development of both explicit and implicit elements evident in the industry overview.

0 to 49 % 50 to 59 % 60 to 69 % 70 to 79 % 80 to 100 %

Name

Description

Rubric Detail

Weight 15.00%

Weight 15.00%

Weight 50.00%

Weight 10.00%

Page 1 of 2Business Internship (2017 - Sem 1)

28/02/2017https://lms.curtin.edu.au/webapps/rubric/do/course/manageRubrics?dispatch=view&c...

Levels of Achievement

Criteria Below Expectations (Fail) 0-49

Meets Expectations (Pass) 50-59

Meets Expectations (Credit) 60-69

Exceeds Expectations (Distinction) 70- 79

Exceeds Expectations (High Distinction) 80- 100

Control of Syntax and Mechanics (WC)

Did not use language in the report that conveys meaning to readers with sufficient clarity and includes numerous errors.

Uses language sufficiently well in the report to convey basic meaning although errors reduce effectiveness of communication.

Uses language in the report that generally conveys meaning to readers with clarity although writing may include some errors.

Uses language in the report that effectively conveys meaning to readers with clarity. Any errors which occur do not reduce effectiveness of communication.

Uses language in the report that skilfully and effectively communicates meaning to readers with clarity and fluency, and is virtually error- free.

Print Print Close Window Close Window

Weight 10.00%

View Associated Items

Page 2 of 2Business Internship (2017 - Sem 1)

28/02/2017https://lms.curtin.edu.au/webapps/rubric/do/course/manageRubrics?dispatch=view&c...