Profession Comm. 7
Review of General Management, Volume 27, Issue 1, Year 2018 119
EMPLOYEES’ VALUE REFLECTED IN THE INCOME
FROM SALARY NEGOTIATION STRATEGY
Oriana Helena NEGULESCU *
Abstract: The information technology allows today the job seekers to access
information not only about the job, but also about the working conditions offered. This option allows the employee to choose the job offers that better meet their
needs. The companies seeking for the best employees and trying to keep them
inside are offering important compensations apart of the salary. Nevertheless, most of them are aware that their employees are the most valuable intangible asset of
the company and are treating them accordingly. In this context, the paper is willing
to present what is the employees’ value for the companies, to analyze three
strategies for the income from salary negotiation based on the literature, to describe the negotiation framework and to propose a conceptual framework for the
negotiation strategy.
Kewords: employees’ value; income from salary; compensations; negotiation strategy
JEL Classification: E24, J21, A13, O15, J33, M12, M52
1. Introduction
The business world is facing a new labor market paradigm that puts
pressure on companies (Finkelstein, 2018), briefly characterized by:
Unemployment is near an all-time low. A low unemployment rate means a lower supply of workers which means it‟s harder for
companies to hire workers.
* Spiru Haret University, Faculty of Legal, economic and administrative sciences,
Brasov, email: [email protected].
Volume 27, Issue 1, Year 2018 Review of General Management 120
Workplace transparency is at an all-time high. This puts exceedingly more pressure on companies actually being a great place to work and
treating people well is now table stakes.
Personal computing power is at an all-time high and accelerating. The ultimate goal of any company is to create profit by fighting for
markets or market niches with competitors. The company's success
lies in the quality-value-loyalty chain (Parasuraman & Grewal,
2000), which combines at least the technology used, the customer
satisfaction and the value of the staff.
However, the new battlefield is as much for talented people as it is for key customers. Companies need to apply the same rigor to people
management as they do to customer management (Michaels et al.,
2001).
The value of the human resources is the most powerful factor in
differentiating the competitive advantage of companies. “People are definitely
a company‟s greatest asset. It doesn‟t make any difference whether the
product is cars or cosmetics. A company is only as good as the people it
keeps.” (Mary Kay Ash, 1984). The employees‟ value is an intangible asset
that contributes to the value of the company and to the profit. “The most
valuable asset of a 21st-century institution, whether business or non-business,
will be its knowledge workers and their productivity” (Drucker, 2013). The
employees are encouraged to continuously learn, to apply and develop their
knowledge, by means of developing their innovation and conception
competences (Dragomir, C., 2017, p. 33)
Many companies, especially multinationals, say the value of
employees is a priority in management and introduced the concept of
proposition of value. The term “employee value proposition” properly puts
the burden on the company to develop a proposition of value to the people it
needs (Wagner, 2017). In fact, this is a management strategy that manages
employees at different levels of the company. An employee‟s value
proposition is nothing but the sum total of the offerings a company offers to
its prospective and current employees so as to elicit their best efforts. It is
the totality of tools that employers implement to be able to attract, retain,
engage and develop employees (Sushman, 2017).
The changes in the labor market switching from the employers' power
to the power of employees, and unemployment reduction, on the other hand,
make companies change their selection and recruitment strategy with costs
Review of General Management, Volume 27, Issue 1, Year 2018 121
as low as possible (Stefanescu, 2017, 17). The candidates and employees, on
the other hand, will need to accumulate wage and other compensation
bargaining skills to be motivated to remain loyal to the company.
In any case, companies have to treat their employees as their clients to
win in front of the competition. “There is a strong link between customer
loyalty and employees. In short, customer loyalty increases sales and profit
potential, and leads to higher employee salaries and lower training costs.
Increased pay boosts employee morale and commitment; as employees stay
longer, their productivity goes up and training costs fall; employees' overall
job satisfaction, combined with their experience, helps them serve
customers better; and customers are then more inclined to stay loyal to the
company” (Reichheld, 1993).
Nevertheless, the company‟s strategy depends on its management
politics:
When employees have supportive managers, are well compensated and well recognized, are not burned out by excessive demands,
have transparent and passionate leadership, and get opportunities
for professional growth, they become loyal workers (Wagner,
2017).
For the human resources policy to meet the organization‟s goals, it
is necessary that it reflect the organization‟s thinking regarding how people should be treated (Panzaru, S., 2016, p.62).
It takes more than just paying competitive wages for an employer to show that it values its employees. The most effective strategy for
companies to value workers is a blend of tangible and intangible
rewards and recognition (Mayhew, 2018).
All in all, the employees, working at any level, are the eyes and ears of any organization. The real fuel and energy behind a
company‟s growth and success comes from its people or the
workforce. It‟s important to keep the employees delighted and
contended to make sure that the organization does not lose on its
customers, profits, and most importantly market value (Shethna,
2017).
The labour is the most expensive and valuable resource at most companies. Managing that resource by time and place is an
unproven, inefficient and costly approach that fails to measure what
really matters: results (Mulcahy, 2017).
Volume 27, Issue 1, Year 2018 Review of General Management 122
2. The strategy to negotiate the income from salary
The salary income negotiation takes place between two parties: the
candidate for a job or the existing employee and the company's
representative, who may be the human resources manager, the recruitment
manager, the direct manager, or a senior manager.
The position of the two parties is different because the candidate seeks
to get a higher salary as well as other compensations, and the person who
represents the company seeks, on one hand, to maintain the balance of the
human resources‟ costs and, on the other hand, to enrich the company with
new performant employees and keeping the trained employees, in order to
bring in the future more added value to the company. In addition to the
salary, some companies offer a number of compensations, including: health
benefits, paid-for-off, options to work remotely, different perks (such as
gym membership or parking garage fees), bonus for moving to another
location, and growth potential over time "(Lypsey, 2016).
By comparison, the candidates and employees request such
compensations to alert the level of education, experience, aptitude, skills,
performance and loyalty, which should be highlighted.
Under these circumstances, the salary income bargaining is a difficult
and risky process, both for the company and for the candidate or employee.
The three main strategies applied in practice (the candidate, the
employee and the company‟s one) are further analyzed.
1. Candidate strategy
The proposed strategies for wage bargaining by job seekers (Madell,
2017; Snider, 2017, King, 2018; Hansen, 2018; Koenig, 2018) include in the
synthesis the preparation for negotiation and the negotiation:
• Preparation for negotiation:
- informing about the salary level in the company's industry,
comparing a possible income with personal expenses and preparing the
salary and compensation variants;
- Assessing your own skills, experience and knowledge in the balance
with the requirements of the job description and setting in mind the salary
and compensations to be accepted.
• Negotiation: listening, explanation, calm, watching the whole picture
and defensive thinking in mind.
Review of General Management, Volume 27, Issue 1, Year 2018 123
There are situations where the candidate does not ask about salary,
does not want to negotiate to get different benefits and the company offers
him a salary below the market rate (Lypsey, 2016). In this situation, the
recruitment manager may decide to hire the candidate for a specified period
(eg one month) to see how he / she responds to the job requirements.
There are also situations where the candidate asks for a salary higher
than the value of the job. "Sometimes, it's the candidate who has unrealistic
salary expectations" (Lypsey, 2016). In this situation, the recruiting manager
seeks to understand the circumstances in which the candidate has reached
that amount and bring it to reality by additional questions and break times.
2. Employee strategy
If the employee gets a good grade in his assessment, he is tempted to
negotiate a higher salary, compensation or promotion on a higher position.
a) Salary In the negotiation process, employees must be confident in their
abilities (not to be afraid) and convinced that they do not want enormous
salaries but only adapted to the corresponding salary on the labor market
(Zhang, 2018). On the other hand, they need to figure out the market value
of their skills and experience, but to be informed about the financial
situation of the company (Koenig, 2018).
b) Compensations If the company does not afford financially to increase wages,
compensation is often more advantageous in that it relieves the employee‟s
costs, such as: the cost of studies, the cost of an additional leave, the cost of
transport to and from location of the company, cost of accident insurance
and others. The employees have to map their request to the goals and needs
of the organization (Koenig, 2018).
c) Career promotion The career advancement is a privilege, not a right and means a new
role, new responsibilities, more authority and more rewards. When you earn
a promotion, it means that the people above you have faith in your abilities
and who you are as a professional (Scivicque, 2018).
Volume 27, Issue 1, Year 2018 Review of General Management 124
In both situations, the employee must be aware that in order to gain
new advantages or privileges, he / she will have to sacrifice time and effort
and show commitment to the company.
3.Company strategy
The manager's strategy that negotiates with a candidate or employee
depends on the company's overall strategy and policies. From this point of
view, there are different types of companies and strategies, but they can be
grouped in 3 categories:
Companies that provide salaries above the average wages in the industry, especially for specialized personnel to maintain them
(Stefanescu, 2017, 18);
Companies that offer a lower salary but, depending on performance, compensate employees with regular extra gains and
other compensations;
Companies that have fixed a fixed salary for each post and who do not offer compensation. "If the employer refuses to negotiate the
salary it demonstrates an unwillingness to cooperate" (Lypsey,
2016).
In the first two strategies, depending on the negotiations and budget
flexibility, companies need to resize their salary budgets and / or spending
budgets with employees‟ compensations.
3. The general framework for negotiations
The process of wage and compensation negotiation can be divided
into two components or moments: in the selection for employment and
during the engagement (the person as employee). Also, people who are
employed are grouped according to their place of work: in offices and
production and sales locations.
The general framework of the negotiations includes: the selection of
candidates and the specific criteria of the two groups of employees, the
employees' requirements for their own benefits and the company's benefits
if they meet their requirements (fig.1).
The criteria considered for the candidates could be:
Review of General Management, Volume 27, Issue 1, Year 2018 125
For offices jobs: carrier journey; candidate Experience; fit &
personalization and, interview; finally, the best fit candidates are
prioritized (Finkelstein, 2018).
For production and sales work place: carrier journey; candidate
experience; interview; practical work and, time & location
acceptance (workshop and sales place).
The general framework of the negotiations also includes: the
employees‟ expectations or requirements and the company‟s benefits if it is
taking into account the employees‟ desire.
The employees’ expectations
For offices jobs: early salary review (such as annually increase
according to the performance); rewards (such as money in addition
for a finalized project); tech & equipment (such as phone, laptop or
car, depending on the tasks and position); feed-back
(communication during the activity); social interaction (such as
week-ends with all staff); recognition for a higher position (the
opportunity for professional development or title); remote work or
flexible time (the opportunity to work from home or having flexible
time for working); vacation & leave time paid; parental leave paid.
Increasingly more, some of the staff is requiring free time to think
and work in quite location, like at home and to be valued according
to the results and deliverables instead of spending the working time
in the office space. This means trust from the employer and
interpersonal communication by using IT devices (Mulcahy, 2017;
Sinatra, 2018).
For production and sales work place: fair wages (the wage
according to the effort); rewards (such as money in addition for
productivity and quality or for sales in addition compared with the
target); bonuses (such as buying some items produced in the
company at the production cost); feed-back; coaching (when new
technology or procedure is implemented); working conditions
(such as lack of pollution, safety and healthy working
environment); recognition for the performance; vacation & leave
time paid; parental leave.
Volume 27, Issue 1, Year 2018 Review of General Management 126
Fig. 1. The income from salary negotiation framework
The employers’ benefits
Even if the employers are offering salaries/wages under the industry
rate, the employees could be much happier with getting different
compensations. In this case, the companies will benefit from the white
Top &
Executive Management
Offices work place
Production & sales work place
Candidates’
selection
Fair wages Rewards Bonuses Feed back Coaching Working conditions Recognition for performance Vacation & leave time paid Parental leave
Criteria: -Carrier journey -Candidate Experience -Fit & Personalization -Interview
Criteria: -Carrier journey -Candidate
Experience -Interview -Practical work -Time & location
acceptance
Early salary review Rewards Tech & equipment Feed back Social interaction Recognition for a higher position Remote work or flex time Vacation & leave time paid
Parental leave
Employees
expectations
Better ideas, results and deliverables Lower costs Higher performance
Higher productivity & quality Lower costs Higher profits Competitive advantage
Employers
benefits
Review of General Management, Volume 27, Issue 1, Year 2018 127
collars of better ideas and results or deliverables, lower costs and higher
performance and from workers of higher productivity & quality, lower costs
and higher profits and, competitive advantage.
Considering that the personnel is the most valuable company‟s asset,
having satisfied and committed people in the company is really a big deal.
4. Bargaining strategy
Most of the companies are using, at least annually, the personnel
evaluation process to know how their employees are responding to the job
description requirements and how they perform according to the imposed
tasks. Depending on the company‟s size, the evaluation is realized by the
top manager, HR (human resource) manager or the direct or superior
executive manager.
Having the results of the personnel evaluation, the managers are going
to negotiate or re-negotiate the employees‟ income from salary at their
request or at the Union request (if it exists). During this negotiation process
the two parties (employee and employer‟s representative) are using different
strategies (fig. 2).
Employee’s strategy
The employee‟s strategy consists in the following steps:
Learn about industry wages & compensations market rate to see what level of salary the employee need to have in his/her mind for the
negotiation;
Compare the cost of living with the industry rate to know what level of salary he/she needs;
Fair valuate own skills & knowledge to know if the employer may be satisfied of his/her results obtained;
Fairly negotiate in steps
negotiate the salary/wage; the employee has to try to obtain a higher salary, but if the company doesn‟t afford it he/she has not
to insist on the subject;
negotiate compensations; sometimes the compensations are more useful than the salary and the employee may insist on
getting more advantages;
Volume 27, Issue 1, Year 2018 Review of General Management 128
Get the mutual agreement as a compromise between employee‟s application and the employer‟s representative acceptance at the bargaining
table.
Fig. 2 Conceptual framework of the income from salary negotiation strategy
Employer’s strategy
The employer‟s strategy includes 6 steps:
Read the evaluation to know about the employee‟s performance and professional evolution;
Learn about the limits of wages fund of the company;
Management
Employee Evaluation Negotiation
Bargaining table strategies
• Learn about industry wages & compensations market rate • Compare the cost of living with the industry rate • Fair valuate own skills & knowledge • Fairly negotiate in steps - Negotiate salary/wage - Negotiate compensations • Get the mutual agreement
• Read the evaluation • Learn about the limits of wages fund • Learn about the limits of compensations expenses • Learn about the company needs for such employee • Fairly start to negotiate • Get the mutual agreement
Results
Happy & motivated Competitive advantage
Review of General Management, Volume 27, Issue 1, Year 2018 129
Learn about the limits of compensations expenses that the company affords;
Learn about the company needs for such employee;
Fairly start to negotiate having in view the employee‟s requirements in balance with the company‟s financial possibilities and human recourse
needs;
Get the mutual agreement as a compromise between employee‟s application and the employer‟s representative acceptance at the bargaining
table.
These strategies, finalised with a compromise at the bargaining table
from the both parties have as results, on one side happy and motivated
employees and, on the other side competitive advantage for the employers.
In getting the mutual agreement, the both parties are considering a win-win
opportunity.
Conclusions
In order to reflect the employees‟ value in the salaries/wages
negotiation process the companies have to update their strategies to the new
paradigm of the labour market.
The companies have to measure what the employees produce, deliver,
and solve and have to consider them as clients. In this respect, the
companies have to consider their employees as being their most valuable
asset. The neglect of treating employees as clients by the company's
management brings serious threats to its future.
As a rule, companies want the best employees, but with lower costs,
and employees want higher wages and compensation as many as possible;
so the negotiation needs to be done in a way of mutual respect, as correct as
possible and, ending with a win-win compromise.
If we put the question “Is the value of employees reflected in the
income from salary negotiation?”, the answer is No; because as Shethna
(2017) stressed “the salaries cannot be considered as true measure of their
skills, and expertise, as the knowledge or creative ideas are abstract. They
are intangible and cannot be measured in terms of money”.
The framework for the salary income negotiations and the conceptual
framework of the salary income negotiation process, as well as the opinions
discussed in this paper, may be useful tools for managers.
Copyright of Review of General Management is the property of Spiru Haret University, Faculty of Management and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use.