Guided response
http://tablets-textbooks.procon.org
Should Tablets Replace Textbooks in K-12 Schools?
Publishing for the K-12 school market is an $8 billion industry, with three companies - McGraw-Hill,
Pearson, and Houghton Mifflin Harcourt - capturing about 85% of this market. Tablets are a $72 billion
industry with 42% of US adults owning a tablet. As tablets have become more prevalent, a new debate has
formed over whether K-12 school districts should switch from print textbooks to digital textbooks on
tablets.
Proponents of tablets say that they are supported by most teachers and students, are much lighter than print
textbooks, and improve standardized test scores. They say tablets can hold hundreds of textbooks, save the
environment by lowering the amount of printing, increase student interactivity and creativity, and that
digital textbooks are cheaper than print textbooks.
Opponents of tablets say that they are expensive, too distracting for students, easy to break, and
costly/time-consuming to fix. They say that tablets contribute to eyestrain, headaches, and blurred vision,
increase the excuses available for students not doing their homework, require costly Wi-Fi networks, and
become quickly outdated as new technologies emerge.
Background of the Issue
Publishing for the K-12 school market is an $8 billion industry, with three companies - McGraw-Hill, Pearson,
and Houghton Mifflin Harcourt - capturing about 85% of this market. [32] Tablets are a $72 billion industry with
42% of US adults owning a tablet. [33][34] As tablets have become more prevalent, a new debate has formed over
whether K-12 school districts should switch from print textbooks to digital textbooks on tablets and e-readers.
Proponents of tablets say that they are supported by most teachers and students, are much lighter than print
textbooks, and improve standardized test scores. They say that tablets can hold hundreds of textbooks, save the
environment by lowering the amount of printing, increase student interactivity and creativity, and that digital
textbooks are cheaper than print textbooks.
Opponents of tablets say that they are expensive, too distracting for students, easy to break, and costly/time-
consuming to fix. They say that tablets contribute to eyestrain, headaches, and blurred vision, increase the
excuses available for students not doing their homework, require costly Wi-Fi networks, and become quickly
outdated as new technologies are released.
2012 marked the first time that more people accessed the Internet via smartphones and tablets than desktop or
laptop computers. [37] By Jan. 2014, 42% of US adults owned a tablet computer, 32% owned an e-book reader,
and 50% owned one or the other (up from 29% in Aug. 2012), according to a survey by the Pew Research
Internet Project. [18] Approximately 227 million tablets were shipped in 2013, and that number is projected to
increase to 386 million by 2017. [38] A joint report by McKinsey and the GSMA predicts the mobile education
market could be worth $70 billion globally by 2020, and predicts demand for mobile education devices, like
smartphones and tablets, may be worth another $32 billion by the same time frame. [38]
43% of Americans read online books, magazines, or newspapers. [18] Amazon announced in July 2010 that e-
books were outselling paper books, and a July 2012 report by the Association of American Publishers showed
that e-book revenue exceeded that of hardcover books for the first time ever. [33] From 2008 to 2012, e-book
sales rose from $68 million per year to $3 billion. [34] While e-books sales rose 117% from 2010 to 2011, the
print book business declined 2.5% in 2011 to $27.2 billion from $27.9 billion in 2010. [33] However, over 90%
of educational textbooks are still read on paper, and only 30% of textbook titles are available electronically. [36]
In Nov. 2010, the US Department of Education released its National Education Technology Plan, a detailed
blueprint on how schools can improve learning with technology. Among its recommendations is to leverage
mobile devices ("the technology students already have") in the classroom. In his Jan. 2011 State of the Union
address, President Obama said, "I want all students to be able to learn from digital textbooks." On Feb. 1, 2012,
the US Department of Education and the Federal Communications Commission (FCC), in collaboration with
several tech organizations, released a downloadable "Digital Textbook Playbook" to "encourage collaboration,
accelerate the development of digital textbooks and improve the quality and penetration of digital learning in K-
12 public education." [6]
99,000 K-12 schools spend $17 billion annually on instructional materials and technology. Many districts,
schools, and states have begun transitioning their instructional materials from paper textbooks to digital learning
environments, according to the "Digital Textbook Playbook." Florida has mandated that all K-12 instructional
materials are required to be provided in electronic format by 2015-2016. California launched a free digital
textbooks initiative in 2009, and West Virginia replaced social studies print textbook purchases with digital
textbooks. Georgia state law requires that electronic copies of K-12 textbooks be made available for use by
students, and the San Diego Unified School district has distributed 78,000 digital textbooks to teachers and
students since 2011 and purchased 26,000 iPads for district use in June 2012. [6] In June 2013, the Los Angeles
Unified School District (LAUSD; the second-largest school district in the country) approved an estimated $1
billion plan to purchase 640,000 iPads with Pearson curricula for all of the K-12 students in the district.[49] [50]
[51] The school district spent $61 million to purchase 47,000 iPads before the contract was suspended on Aug.
26, 2014 due to allegations of impropriety in the bidding process. LAUSD plans to re-bid the tablets project. [49] [50]
The percentage of K-12 classrooms with internet access has increased from 51% in 1998 to 98% in 2012, and
40% of elementary school teachers use computers during in-class instruction. Several meta-studies on the use of
computer technology in the classroom show a small but statistically significant increase in learning outcomes.
[17] Nineteen percent of children ages 2-5 in the United States, Canada, Japan, Australia, New Zealand, Czech
Republic, France, Spain, Italy, Germany, and the UK can use a smartphone application. By comparison, 9% can
tie their own shoelaces. More children ages 2-5 can open a web browser (25%) than swim unaided (20%). 20%
of children ages 6-9 use email, and 14% are on Facebook. [40] A study by Nielsen Mobile Insights found that
53% of blacks and 57% of Latinos are smartphone users, well above the 45% rate of non-Hispanic whites. [41]
Blacks and Hispanics are more than twice as likely to use Twitter and rely on mobile phones as a primary
connection to the Internet than whites. [42][43]
The American Association of Publishers says that the average net unit price of a K-12 print textbook was $65 in
2010. [44] A 2005 report by Congress' Government Accountability Office found that print textbook prices nearly
tripled from 1986 to 2004, rising at twice the rate of inflation. [45] A report from the Student Public Interest
Research Group found that textbook wholesale prices have risen nearly four and a half times the rate of inflation
from 1990-2009. [46] Digital textbooks on average cost 50-60% less than new print textbooks. Tablets in the
United States cost on average $489 in 2011, $386 in 2012, $343 in 2013, and are projected to cost $263 in 2015.
[10][11] However, implementation costs for e-textbooks on iPad tablets are 552% higher than new print textbooks
in an average high school, and the annual cost per student per class with tablets is $71.55 vs. $14.26 for print
textbooks. [23] This difference is due to additional costs associated with building wi-fi infrastructure, training
teachers and administrators how to use the technology, and annual publisher fees to continue using e-textbooks.
According to an Apr. 2012 peer-reviewed study in Archives of Disease in Childhood, the average weight of a
student's backpack is 15.4 pounds (an average of 3-4 books), and the average weight of a tablet is between 0.75
to two pounds. [5] Pediatricians and chiropractors recommend that students not carry more than 15% of their
body weight in a backpack, but an Apr. 14, 2004 study by the State of California found that the combined
average weight of textbooks in just the four core subjects of History-Social Science, Mathematics,
Reading/Language Arts, and Science exceeded this percentage at nearly all grade levels from 1-12. [12]
According to data from the United States Consumer Product Safety Commission, over the period from 1994-
2000 more than 23,000 youths ages 6 to 18 were treated in emergency rooms for backpack-related injuries, such
as contusions, sprains and strains to the back and shoulders, and fractures. California and Georgia are the only
states with legislation related to textbook size and weight, according to the Association of American Publishers.
[48] In California, the maximum weight for a textbook is three pounds for grades K-4, four pounds for 5-8, and
five pounds for 9-12. [39]
Pro & Con Arguments: "Should Tablets Replace Textbooks in K-12 Schools?"
PRO Tablet
1. Tablets help students learn more material faster. Technology-based instruction can
reduce the time students take to reach a
learning objective by 30-80%, according to
the US Department of Education and studies
by the National Training and Simulation
Association. [6]
2. 81% of K-12 teachers believe that "tablets enrich classroom education." The survey
of technology in the classroom by the Public
Broadcasting Service (PBS) also concluded
that 77% of teachers found technology to
"increase student motivation to learn." [7]
3. Tablets can hold hundreds of textbooks on one device, plus homework, quizzes, and
other files, eliminating the need for
physical storage of books and classroom
materials. The average tablet contains
anywhere from 8 to 64 gigabytes (GB) of
storage space. On the Amazon Kindle Fire,
for instance, 1,000 books take up one GB of
space. [8]
4. E-textbooks on tablets cost on average 50- 60% less than print textbooks. According
to a 2012 report from the Federal
Communications Commission (FCC), K-12
school districts spend more than $8 billion
per year on textbooks. [6] E-textbooks can
save schools between $250-$1,000 per
student per year. [9] Tablet prices also
continue to drop, making them increasingly
affordable. Tablets cost on average $489 in
2011, $386 in 2012, and are projected to cost
CON Tablet
1. Handheld technological devices including tablets are associated with a range of
health problems. Handhelds contribute to
Computer Vision Syndrome, which causes
eyestrain, headaches, blurred vision, and dry
eyes, according to the American Optometric
Association. [20] People who use mobile
devices more often have a higher incidence
of musculoskeletal disorders associated with
repetitive strain on muscles, including carpal
tunnel syndrome, neck pain ("text neck"),
shoulder pain, and fibromyalgia. [21][22]
2. Using tablets is more expensive than using print textbooks. Implementing tablets in K-
12 schools requires purchasing hardware (the
tablet) and software (the textbooks), building
new wi-fi infrastructure, and training
teachers and administrators how to use the
technology. Implementation costs for e-
textbooks on iPad tablets are 552% higher
than new print textbooks in an average high
school. Lee Wilson, a prominent education
marketing expert, estimated the annual cost
per student per class with tablets to be
$71.55 vs. $14.26 for print textbooks. [23]
3. Tablets have too many distractions for classroom use. Students may pay attention
to apps, email, games, and websites instead
of their teachers. 87% of K-12 teachers
believe that "today’s digital technologies are
creating an easily distracted generation with
short attention spans." [24] Four-fifths of
students aged 8 - 18 multitask while using
digital media. [25]
$263 in 2015. [10][11]
5. Tablets help to improve student achievement on standardized tests. Publisher Houghton Mifflin Harcourt tested
an interactive, digital version of an Algebra 1
textbook for Apple's iPad in California's
Riverside Unified School District. Students
who used the iPad version scored 20 percent
higher on standardized tests versus students
who learned with traditional textbooks. [4]
6. Tablets contain many technological features that cannot be found in print
textbooks. Tablets give users the ability to
highlight and edit text and write notes
without ruining a textbook for the next user.
Tablets have a search function, a
backlighting option to read in low light, and
a built-in dictionary. Interactive diagrams
and videos increase student creativity,
motivation, attentiveness, and engagement
with classroom materials.
7. Print textbooks are heavy and cause injuries, while a tablet only weighs 1-2
pounds. Pediatricians and chiropractors
recommend that students carry less than 15%
of their body weight in a backpack, but the
combined average weight of textbooks in
History, Mathematics, Science, and
Reading/Language Arts exceeds this
percentage at nearly all grade levels from 1-
12. [12] According to the US Consumer
Product Safety Commission, during the
2011-12 school year more than 13,700 kids,
aged 5 to 18, were treated for backpack-
related injuries. [5]
8. Tablets help students better prepare for a world immersed in technology. Students
that learn technology skills early in life will
be better prepared to pursue relevant careers
later in life. The fastest growing and highest
paying jobs in the United States are
technology intensive. Employment in
"computer and information systems" is
4. People who read print text comprehend more, remember more, and learn more
than those who read digital text. The brain
interprets printed and digital text in different
ways, and people generally read digital text
20-30% slower than print. [26][27] According
to Pulitzer Prize winning technology writer
Nicholas Carr, peer-reviewed studies show
that reading hyper-linked text may increase
the brain's "cognitive load," lowering the
ability to process, store, and retain
information, or "translate the new material
into conceptual knowledge." [28] In addition, students who type lecture notes instead of write their
notes by hand tended to write more, process less, and
perform worse on recall tests.[52]
5. Many students do not have sufficient home internet bandwidth to use tablets.
Students "need home broadband to access
digital content and to complete Internet
based homework," according to FCC
Chairman Julius Genachowski and Secretary
of Education Arne Duncan, but about a third
of Americans – 100 million people – do not
have broadband internet at home. [6] A 2010
FCC survey found that nearly 80% of K-12
schools reported broadband connections that
were "inadequate to meet their current needs. [47]
6. Manufacturing tablets is environmentally destructive and dangerous to human
health. According to the New York Times,
the "adverse health impacts from making one
e-reader are estimated to be 70 times greater
than those from making a single book." One
tablet requires the extraction of 33 pounds of
minerals, 79 gallons of water, and 100
kilowatt hours of fossil fuels resulting in 66
pounds of carbon dioxide. Print books
produce 100 times fewer greenhouse gases.
Two gallons of water are required to make
the pulp slurry that is pressed and heat-dried
to make paper, and only two kilowatt hours
are required to form and dry the sheets of
paper. [3]
expected to grow by 18% between 2010-20,
according to the US Bureau of Labor
Statistics. [13]
9. On a tablet, e-textbooks can be updated instantly to get new editions or
information. Schools will not have to
constantly purchase new hardware, software,
or new physical copies of textbooks. FCC
Chairman Julius Genachowski and Secretary
of Education Arne Duncan said that "too
many students are using books that are 7-10
years old with outdated material." Tablets are
especially beneficial for subjects that
constantly change, such as biology or
computer science. [6]
10. Tablets lower the amount of paper teachers have to print for handouts and
assignments, helping to save the
environment and money. A school with
100 teachers uses on average 250,000 pieces
of paper annually. [14] A school of 1,000
students on average spends between $3,000-
4,000 a month on paper, ink, and toner, not
counting printer wear and tear or technical
support costs. [15]
11. Tablets allow teachers to better customize student learning. There are thousands of
education and tutoring applications on
tablets, so teachers can tailor student learning
to an individual style/personality instead of a
one-size-fits-all approach. There are more
than 20,000 education apps available for the
iPad alone. [16]
12. Files on one tablet can be downloaded onto any other tablet, increasing flexibility
and convenience for teachers and
students. E-textbooks and other files can be
stored on "cloud” servers and accessed on
any equivalent device. Users can sign into an
account on a different device and access all
of their information.
7. A broken tablet requires an experienced technician to fix, which can be costly and
time-consuming. Textbooks can usually be
repaired with basic supplies such as glue or
tape.
8. Print textbooks cannot crash, freeze, or get hacked. Unlike tablets, there is no
chance of getting malware, spyware, or
having personal information stolen from a
print textbook.
9. The average battery life of a tablet is 7.26 hours, shorter than the length of a school
day. Tablets constantly need charging,
increasing electricity demands on schools
and the need for new electrical outlets. [29]
10. Tablets are more susceptible to theft than print textbooks. In San Francisco, New
York, and Los Angeles, robberies related to
internet-enabled handheld devices (including
tablets) have accounted for 50, 40, and 25
percent respectively of all robberies in 2012.
Stolen and lost internet-enabled handheld
devices have cost Americans more than $30
billion in 2012. [30]
11. Tablets enable students to cut corners or cheat on schoolwork. Students can easily
avoid reading and analyzing texts on their
own because they can quickly look up
passages in an e-textbook and search for
answers on the internet.
12. The higher cost of tablets marginalizes poorer school districts and increases the
"digital divide." Rich school districts can
afford to implement e-textbooks on tablets,
while poor school districts cannot. Low
income schools are less likely to implement
an e-textbook program than to pay for
teachers or basic classroom supplies.
13. High-level education officials support tablets over textbooks. Secretary of
Education Arne Duncan and Federal
Communications Commission chair Julius
Genachowski said on Feb. 1, 2012 that
schools and publishers should "switch to
digital textbooks within five years to foster
interactive education, save money on books,
and ensure classrooms in the US use up-to-
date content." The federal government, in
collaboration with several tech organizations,
released a 70-page guide for schools called
the "Digital Textbook Playbook," a
"roadmap for educators to accelerate the
transition to digital textbooks." [6]
14. Students who own tablets purchase and read more books than those who read
print books alone. The average tablet-
owning US student reads 24 books per year
on a tablet compared with 15 in print for
those who do not own a tablet. [17] According
to a survey by the Pew Internet and
American Life Project, 30% of e-content
readers (including 40% of those under age
30) say that they now spend more time
reading than they used to due to the
availability of e-content. [18]
15. Using a tablet is so intuitive that it makes learning fun and easy. In two isolated rural
villages in Ethiopia, the One Laptop Per
Child organization dropped off closed boxes
containing tablets pre-loaded with
educational apps, taped shut, with no
instruction. Within five days, elementary
school-age students without prior education
were using 47 apps per child, per day.
Within two weeks, they were singing ABC
songs, and within five months they had
successfully hacked the tablet's operating
system and customized the desktop settings. [19]
13. Tablets increase the number of excuses available for students not doing their
schoolwork. Students have new available
excuses, including: "the tablet broke/froze,"
"I forgot the tablet at home so I can't do
schoolwork today," and "I couldn't find my
charger."
14. Tablets shift the focus of learning from the teacher to the technology. This change
marginalizes decades of learned wisdom in
the teaching profession in favor of an
unproven technology. According to
education reformer Mike Schmoker, until the
core elements of literacy and critical thinking
are learned by every student, "it makes little
sense to adopt or learn new programs,
technology, or any other innovations."
Technology gets in the way and makes
learning and teaching more burdensome. [31]
15. Many textbooks are not available in digital format or on the specific tablet
used by a school. As of 2012, only 30% of
textbook titles are available electronically.
There are many different companies that
manufacture tablets, and most contract with
one specific e-book seller. This means that
some textbooks may not be sold across all
tablets. [32][33][34]
16. Tablets may be too difficult for less- technologically-savvy students to operate. When Daytona State College conducted an
electronic textbook focus group, the most
common reason given for withdrawing from
the group was "I did not feel that I had the
technical ability to read or reference my
textbook from a computer." [35]
17. Tablets are unnecessary because print textbooks that are not brand new still
convey relevant information to K-12
students. A K-12 student learning from an
older print textbook still learns the basics of
anatomy, physics, algebra, geometry, and the
US government
Did You Know?
1. A 4GB tablet filled with 3,500 e-books weighs a billionth of a billionth of a gram more than if it were empty of data - a difference that is approximately the same weight as a molecule of DNA. The
same number of physical books would weigh about two tons. [1]
2. In San Francisco, New York, and Los Angeles, robberies related to internet-enabled handheld devices (including tablets) have accounted for 50, 40, and 25 percent respectively of all robberies in
2012. [2]
3. Manufacturing one tablet requires the extraction of 33 pounds of minerals, 79 gallons of water, and 100 kilowatt hours of fossil fuels resulting in 66 pounds of carbon dioxide. [3]
4. Students who used an interactive, digital version of an Algebra 1 textbook for Apple's iPad in California's Riverside Unified School District in 2012 scored 20 percent higher on standardized tests
vs. students who learned with print textbooks. [4]
5. During the 2011-12 school year more than 13,700 US children, aged 5 to 18, were treated in hospitals and doctors' offices for backpack-related injuries (5,000 in emergency rooms) such as
contusions, sprains, fractures, and strains to the back and shoulders. [5]