Systematic Rev.

profilenancedestiny
PRISMA_2020_flow_diagram_CRJ7501.pdf

PRISMA 2020 flow diagram for new systematic reviews which included searches of databases and additional sources

Source: Page MJ, et al. BMJ 2021;372:n71. doi: 10.1136/bmj.n71. This work is licensed under CC BY 4.0. To view a copy of this license, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Program, Policy, or Procedure evaluated: Implementation of Body Worn cameras in Correctional Facilities Inclusion Criteria: empirical data, English studies, 2015-2025, peer reviewed articles Exclusion Criteria: older than 10 yrs, NOT peer reviewed, duplicate studies without full access to txt, research that does not include measurable outcomes, studies that focus on exclusively bwc in community policing Keywords used: body worn cameras/ corrections, inmate perceptions/body worn cameras, correctional legitimacy/body worn cameras Databases searched: ProQuest, Google Scholar

Studies identified from Databases (n = 85)

Additional studies identified through other sources (n= 5 )

Studies screened with inclusion/exclusion criteria (n = 70)

Studies excluded (n =40 )

Studies with full-text available (n = 30)

Studies without available full-text (n = )

Studies assessed for eligibility **skip if no other studies were eliminated for any other reason (n =30 )

Studies excluded: Reason 1 (n =10 ) focused on police use only Reason 2 (n =5 ) not theoretical Reason 3 (n = 3)did not measure accountably

Studies included in review (n = 12)

Identification of studies via databases additional sources

Id e n

ti fi

c a ti

o n

S

c re

e n

in g

In c lu

d e d

Barbara Cooke
85+5=90
Barbara Cooke
All 90 had full-text available? In the neighboring box you say only 30 had full-text available
Barbara Cooke
What does this mean?