Help with research paper!
marielab27
PrimingStudiesPaperll.docxRunning head: Priming Studies 1
Priming Studies 8
Priming Studies
Mariela Burgalin
Florida International University
Methods
Participants
Materials and Procedures
Results
Appendix A
|
Statistics |
||||
|
|
Gender (1 = M, 2 = F) |
Race |
Age |
|
|
N |
Valid |
131 |
135 |
135 |
|
|
Missing |
4 |
0 |
0 |
|
Mean |
1.4656 |
2.5852 |
25.1926 |
|
|
Median |
1.0000 |
2.0000 |
23.0000 |
|
|
Mode |
1.00 |
2.00 |
23.00 |
|
|
Std. Deviation |
.50073 |
1.54719 |
7.79542 |
|
|
Range |
1.00 |
5.00 |
42.00 |
|
|
Minimum |
1.00 |
1.00 |
17.00 |
|
|
Maximum |
2.00 |
6.00 |
59.00 |
|
Gender (1 = M, 2 = F) |
|||||
|
|
Frequency |
Percent |
Valid Percent |
Cumulative Percent |
|
|
Valid |
Male |
70 |
51.9 |
53.4 |
53.4 |
|
|
Female |
61 |
45.2 |
46.6 |
100.0 |
|
|
Total |
131 |
97.0 |
100.0 |
|
|
Missing |
System |
4 |
3.0 |
|
|
|
Total |
135 |
100.0 |
|
|
|
Race |
|||||
|
|
Frequency |
Percent |
Valid Percent |
Cumulative Percent |
|
|
Valid |
Caucasian |
35 |
25.9 |
25.9 |
25.9 |
|
|
Hispanic |
56 |
41.5 |
41.5 |
67.4 |
|
|
Native Indian |
3 |
2.2 |
2.2 |
69.6 |
|
|
African American |
22 |
16.3 |
16.3 |
85.9 |
|
|
Asian American |
9 |
6.7 |
6.7 |
92.6 |
|
|
Other |
10 |
7.4 |
7.4 |
100.0 |
|
|
Total |
135 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
|
|
Age |
|||||
|
|
Frequency |
Percent |
Valid Percent |
Cumulative Percent |
|
|
Valid |
17.00 |
4 |
3.0 |
3.0 |
3.0 |
|
|
18.00 |
12 |
8.9 |
8.9 |
11.9 |
|
|
19.00 |
8 |
5.9 |
5.9 |
17.8 |
|
|
20.00 |
6 |
4.4 |
4.4 |
22.2 |
|
|
21.00 |
19 |
14.1 |
14.1 |
36.3 |
|
|
22.00 |
12 |
8.9 |
8.9 |
45.2 |
|
|
23.00 |
21 |
15.6 |
15.6 |
60.7 |
|
|
24.00 |
6 |
4.4 |
4.4 |
65.2 |
|
|
25.00 |
6 |
4.4 |
4.4 |
69.6 |
|
|
26.00 |
2 |
1.5 |
1.5 |
71.1 |
|
|
27.00 |
10 |
7.4 |
7.4 |
78.5 |
|
|
28.00 |
2 |
1.5 |
1.5 |
80.0 |
|
|
29.00 |
2 |
1.5 |
1.5 |
81.5 |
|
|
31.00 |
2 |
1.5 |
1.5 |
83.0 |
|
|
32.00 |
4 |
3.0 |
3.0 |
85.9 |
|
|
33.00 |
3 |
2.2 |
2.2 |
88.1 |
|
|
34.00 |
2 |
1.5 |
1.5 |
89.6 |
|
|
35.00 |
2 |
1.5 |
1.5 |
91.1 |
|
|
36.00 |
2 |
1.5 |
1.5 |
92.6 |
|
|
43.00 |
4 |
3.0 |
3.0 |
95.6 |
|
|
45.00 |
4 |
3.0 |
3.0 |
98.5 |
|
|
59.00 |
2 |
1.5 |
1.5 |
100.0 |
|
|
Total |
135 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
|
Appendix B
|
Case Processing Summary |
||||||
|
|
Cases |
|||||
|
|
Valid |
Missing |
Total |
|||
|
|
N |
Percent |
N |
Percent |
N |
Percent |
|
Condition (1 = S, 2 = R, 3 = E) * Manipulation Check (1 = S, 2 = R, 3 = E) |
135 |
100.0% |
0 |
0.0% |
135 |
100.0% |
|
Condition (1 = S, 2 = R, 3 = E) * Manipulation Check (1 = S, 2 = R, 3 = E) Crosstabulation |
||||||
|
|
Manipulation Check (1 = S, 2 = R, 3 = E) |
Total |
||||
|
|
Sexuality |
Romance |
Education |
|
||
|
Condition (1 = S, 2 = R, 3 = E) |
Sexuality |
Count |
37 |
4 |
0 |
41 |
|
|
|
% within Condition (1 = S, 2 = R, 3 = E) |
90.2% |
9.8% |
0.0% |
100.0% |
|
|
Romance |
Count |
6 |
41 |
0 |
47 |
|
|
|
% within Condition (1 = S, 2 = R, 3 = E) |
12.8% |
87.2% |
0.0% |
100.0% |
|
|
Education |
Count |
0 |
2 |
45 |
47 |
|
|
|
% within Condition (1 = S, 2 = R, 3 = E) |
0.0% |
4.3% |
95.7% |
100.0% |
|
Total |
Count |
43 |
47 |
45 |
135 |
|
|
|
% within Condition (1 = S, 2 = R, 3 = E) |
31.9% |
34.8% |
33.3% |
100.0% |
|
Chi-Square Tests |
|||
|
|
Value |
df |
Asymptotic Significance (2-sided) |
|
Pearson Chi-Square |
205.587a |
4 |
.000 |
|
Likelihood Ratio |
217.791 |
4 |
.000 |
|
Linear-by-Linear Association |
116.490 |
1 |
.000 |
|
N of Valid Cases |
135 |
|
|
|
a. 0 cells (0.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 13.06. |
|
Symmetric Measures |
|||
|
|
Value |
Approximate Significance |
|
|
Nominal by Nominal |
Phi |
1.234 |
.000 |
|
|
Cramer's V |
.873 |
.000 |
|
N of Valid Cases |
135 |
|
Appendix C
|
ANOVA |
|||||
|
Part II: Riley seems flirtatious |
|||||
|
|
Sum of Squares |
df |
Mean Square |
F |
Sig. |
|
Between Groups |
12.979 |
2 |
6.489 |
6.551 |
.002 |
|
Within Groups |
130.755 |
132 |
.991 |
|
|
|
Total |
143.733 |
134 |
|
|
|
|
Multiple Comparisons |
||||||
|
Dependent Variable: Part II: Riley seems flirtatious |
||||||
|
Tukey HSD |
||||||
|
(I) Condition (1 = S, 2 = R, 3 = E) |
(J) Condition (1 = S, 2 = R, 3 = E) |
Mean Difference (I-J) |
Std. Error |
Sig. |
99.9% Confidence Interval |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lower Bound |
Upper Bound |
|
Sexuality |
Romance |
.63985 |
.21269 |
.009 |
-.1417 |
1.4214 |
|
|
Education |
.70368 |
.21269 |
.003 |
-.0779 |
1.4853 |
|
Romance |
Sexuality |
-.63985 |
.21269 |
.009 |
-1.4214 |
.1417 |
|
|
Education |
.06383 |
.20531 |
.948 |
-.6906 |
.8183 |
|
Education |
Sexuality |
-.70368 |
.21269 |
.003 |
-1.4853 |
.0779 |
|
|
Romance |
-.06383 |
.20531 |
.948 |
-.8183 |
.6906 |
|
Part II: Riley seems flirtatious |
||
|
Tukey HSDa,b |
||
|
Condition (1 = S, 2 = R, 3 = E) |
N |
Subset for alpha = 0.001 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
Education |
47 |
2.8085 |
|
Romance |
47 |
2.8723 |
|
Sexuality |
41 |
3.5122 |
|
Sig. |
|
.003 |
|
Means for groups in homogeneous subsets are displayed. |
||
|
a. Uses Harmonic Mean Sample Size = 44.814. |
||
|
b. The group sizes are unequal. The harmonic mean of the group sizes is used. Type I error levels are not guaranteed. |
Appendix D
|
ANOVA |
|||||
|
Part II: Riley seems seductive |
|||||
|
|
Sum of Squares |
df |
Mean Square |
F |
Sig. |
|
Between Groups |
18.033 |
2 |
9.017 |
11.221 |
.000 |
|
Within Groups |
106.071 |
132 |
.804 |
|
|
|
Total |
124.104 |
134 |
|
|
|
|
Multiple Comparisons |
||||||
|
Dependent Variable: Part II: Riley seems seductive |
||||||
|
Tukey HSD |
||||||
|
(I) Condition (1 = S, 2 = R, 3 = E) |
(J) Condition (1 = S, 2 = R, 3 = E) |
Mean Difference (I-J) |
Std. Error |
Sig. |
99.9% Confidence Interval |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lower Bound |
Upper Bound |
|
Sexuality |
Romance |
.87130* |
.19156 |
.000 |
.1673 |
1.5753 |
|
|
Education |
.67981 |
.19156 |
.002 |
-.0241 |
1.3838 |
|
Romance |
Sexuality |
-.87130* |
.19156 |
.000 |
-1.5753 |
-.1673 |
|
|
Education |
-.19149 |
.18492 |
.556 |
-.8710 |
.4880 |
|
Education |
Sexuality |
-.67981 |
.19156 |
.002 |
-1.3838 |
.0241 |
|
|
Romance |
.19149 |
.18492 |
.556 |
-.4880 |
.8710 |
|
*. The mean difference is significant at the 0.001 level. |
|
Part II: Riley seems seductive |
|||
|
Tukey HSDa,b |
|||
|
Condition (1 = S, 2 = R, 3 = E) |
N |
Subset for alpha = 0.001 |
|
|
|
|
1 |
2 |
|
Romance |
47 |
2.7872 |
|
|
Education |
47 |
2.9787 |
2.9787 |
|
Sexuality |
41 |
|
3.6585 |
|
Sig. |
|
.571 |
.001 |
|
Means for groups in homogeneous subsets are displayed. |
|||
|
a. Uses Harmonic Mean Sample Size = 44.814. |
|||
|
b. The group sizes are unequal. The harmonic mean of the group sizes is used. Type I error levels are not guaranteed. |
