Assignment 1

profilesajhal-1
PrimarySourceHIST101RubricBelkeder21.xlsx

Sheet1

Primary Source Rubric: Belkeder
Part I 50 pts
3.5 Organization
Excellent Good Acceptable Poor Unacceptable
4.5-5 4-4.4 3.5-3.9 3.0-3.4 0-2.9
a. Disjointed c. Too many tangents
b. Repetitious d. Logical and clear
3.5 Writing Mechanics Excellent Good Acceptable Poor Unacceptable
4.5-5 4-4.4 3.5-3.9 3.0-3.4 0-2.9
a. Spelling needs improvement d. Punctuation errors
b. Grammar errors e. Too vernacular
c. Incomplete sentences f. Well written
14 Identification Excellent Good Acceptable Poor Unacceptable
18-20 16.17.5 14-15.5 12-13.5 0-11
a. Too vague e. Insightful
b. Failure to identify author f. Logical
c. Failure to identify time & place
d. Failure to identify source
15 Analysis Excellent Good Acceptable Poor Unacceptable
18-20 16.17.5 14-15.5 12-13.5 0-11
a. Insufficient synthesis f. Minimal amount of work
b. Insufficient analysis g. Ragged and unfocused
c. Too vague h. Thoughtful and understandable
d. Facts sometimes incorrect i. Thoughtful insight
e.+C30:D52 No insight into historical significance
_______ General Comments
a. Very informative paper e. Much work went into this
b. Provocative f. Please follow directions
c. Satisfactory g. Not university level work
d. Meets minimum requirements
36 /50 Total Points out of 50.
A= 45-50 B= 40-44.5 C= 35-39.5 D= 30-34.5 F= 0-29
Part II 50 pts
3.5 Organization
Excellent Good Acceptable Poor Unacceptable
4.5-5 4-4.4 3.5-3.9 3.0-3.4 0-2.9
Excellent Good Acceptable Poor Unacceptable
4.5-5 4-4.4 3.5-3.9 3.0-3.4 0-2.9
a. Disjointed c. Too many tangents
b. Repetitious d. Logical and clear
3.5 Writing Mechanics Excellent Good Acceptable Poor Unacceptable
4.5-5 4-4.4 3.5-3.9 3.0-3.4 0-2.9
a. Spelling needs improvement d. Punctuation errors
b. Grammar errors e. Too vernacular
c. Incomplete sentences f. Well written
12 Identification Excellent Good Acceptable Poor Unacceptable
18-20 16.17.5 14-15.5 12-13.5 0-11
a. Too vague e. Insightful
b. Failure to identify author f. Logical
c. Failure to identify time & place
d. Failure to identify source
13 Analysis Excellent Good Acceptable Poor Unacceptable
18-20 16.17.5 14-15.5 12-13.5 0-11
a. Insufficient synthesis f. Minimal amount of work
b. Insufficient analysis g. Ragged and unfocused
c. Too vague h. Thoughtful and understandable
d. Facts sometimes incorrect i. Thoughtful insight
e. No insight into historical significance
_______ General Comments
a. Very informative paper e. Much work went into this
b. Provocative f. Please follow directions
c. Satisfactory g. Not university level work
d. Meets minimum requirements h. Plagiarized (-100 pts)
32 /50 Total Points out of 50.
A= 45-50 B= 44.5–40 C= 35—39.3 D=30-34.9 F= 0-29
Overall Grade
68
60-69: Adequate (D): minimal knowledge; little mastery of principles; student recognizes some of the most important
terms, concepts and ideas, but does not know what to do with them.
70-79: Satisfactory (C): average mastery of facts and principles; evidence that the student recognizes terms and
can read the literature of the subject with intelligence.
80-89: Good (B): above-average mastery of facts and principles; evidence that the student appreciates the relation
of the subject matter to other courses; high expectation of an ability to direct the activity of others in this subject
90-100: Excellent (A): superior mastery of facts and principles; evidence that the student relates the subject matter
to other courses and to his or her own experience; demonstration of creative imagination

Sheet2

Sheet3