Scenario Testing Results

2/4/22, 6:20 PM Preview Rubric: Step 4 Scenario Testing Results (85 Points) - 3WI2022 Vir Ldrshp Global Based Teams (BADM-703-01B) - Indiana Wesleyan U…

https://brightspace.indwes.edu/d2l/lp/rubrics/preview.d2l?ou=157107&rubricId=482277&originTool=quicklinks 1/3

Step 4 Scenario Testing Results (85 Points) Course: 3WI2022 Vir Ldrshp Global Based Teams (BADM-703-01B)

Criteria Excellent Competent Needs Improvement

Inadequate/Faili ng

Criterion Score

Evaluation / 22

Recommendati

on

/ 22

22 points

The deliverable

demonstrates

the team's ability

to thoroughly

evaluate the

effectiveness of

the solution in

multiple

scenarios.

Additional

scenarios are

evaluated.

20 points

The deliverable

demonstrates

the team's ability

to adequately

evaluate the

effectiveness of

the solution in

multiple

scenarios.

18 points

The deliverable

demonstrates

the team's

limited ability to

evaluate the

effectiveness of

the solution in

multiple

scenarios.

A lack of

scenario variety

limits the

evaluation.

15 points

The deliverable

demonstrates

the team's

inability to

evaluate the

effectiveness of

the solution in

multiple

scenarios.

22 points

The deliverable

includes specific

recommendation

s for the

proposed

solution that

demonstrate the

team's ability to

interpret their

evaluation.

20 points

The deliverable

includes specific

recommendation

s for the

proposed

solution.

18 points

The deliverable

includes some

general

recommendation

s for the

proposed

solution.

15 points

The deliverable

does not include

relevant

recommendation

s for the

proposed

solution.

2/4/22, 6:20 PM Preview Rubric: Step 4 Scenario Testing Results (85 Points) - 3WI2022 Vir Ldrshp Global Based Teams (BADM-703-01B) - Indiana Wesleyan U…

https://brightspace.indwes.edu/d2l/lp/rubrics/preview.d2l?ou=157107&rubricId=482277&originTool=quicklinks 2/3Total

Criteria Excellent Competent Needs Improvement

Inadequate/Faili ng

Criterion Score

Teamwork / 22

Written

Communicatio

n

/ 19

22 points

Teammates

interact well by

offering their

own

understanding

and perspectives,

asking questions

about ideas,

sharing

responsibility,

and contributing

equally.

Teammates

demonstrate

effective

interpersonal

communication

and engage in

resolving

conflicts

together.

20 points

Teammates

interact to

adequately meet

expectations.

18 points

Teammates

attempt to work

with each other,

but demonstrate

limited

interaction or an

imbalance of

responsibility

that impedes

collaboration.

15 points

Teammates do

not communicate

well and/or

follow through

on individual

responsibilities

to achieve team

goals.

19 points

The deliverable is

presented

professionally

and is easy to

read and

understand. It

demonstrates

the effective

control of

grammar and

spelling.

In-text citations

and references

are correctly

formatted using

APA.

17 points

The deliverable is

presented

professionally

and is readable.

It demonstrates

the basic control

of grammar and

spelling, with

only minimal

errors.

In-text citations

and references

are correctly

formatted using

APA.

15 points

The deliverable is

lacking in

professional

presentation. At

times it is

difficult to read

or understand

due to issues

with grammar

and spelling.

In-text citations

and references

are attempted,

but incorrectly

formatted.

13 points

The deliverable

is not

professional. It is

difficult to read

or understand

due to many

issues with

grammar and

spelling.

No in-text

citations or

references are

appropriately

used.

2/4/22, 6:20 PM Preview Rubric: Step 4 Scenario Testing Results (85 Points) - 3WI2022 Vir Ldrshp Global Based Teams (BADM-703-01B) - Indiana Wesleyan U…

https://brightspace.indwes.edu/d2l/lp/rubrics/preview.d2l?ou=157107&rubricId=482277&originTool=quicklinks 3/3

Total / 85

Overall Score

Excellent 78 points minimum

Competent 69 points minimum

Needs Improvement 61 points minimum

Inadequate/Failing 0 points minimum