Summary of solution and protocals (task force introduces Agile as way of working for company that is waterfall (SDLC))
1/30/22, 3:00 AM Preview Rubric: Step 3 Task Force Plan Proposal (85 Points) - 3WI2022 Vir Ldrshp Global Based Teams (BADM-703-01B) - Indiana Wesleyan…
https://brightspace.indwes.edu/d2l/lp/rubrics/preview.d2l?ou=157107&rubricId=482276&originTool=quicklinks 1/3
Step 3 Task Force Plan Proposal (85 Points) Course: 3WI2022 Vir Ldrshp Global Based Teams (BADM-703-01B)
Criteria Excellent Competent Needs Improvement
Inadequate/Faili ng
Criterion Score
Application of
Research
/ 15
Solution
Proposal
/ 30
15 points
The deliverable
demonstrates
the team's skillful
use of high-
quality, credible,
relevant sources
to develop ideas
that are
appropriate for
the solution.
13 points
The deliverable
demonstrates
the team's use of
credible, relevant
sources to
support ideas
that are
appropriate for
the solution.
12 points
The deliverable
demonstrates
the team's
attempt to use
some relevant
sources to
identify ideas
that are
appropriate for
the solution.
10 points
The deliverable
demonstrates
the team's
inability to use
sources and
identify ideas
that are
appropriate for
the solution.
30 points
The deliverable
proposes a
thorough
solution that
addresses the
contextual,
ethical, logical,
social, and
cultural
dimensions of
the problem.
27 points
The deliverable
proposes a
solution that
addresses some
of the following
dimensions of
the problem:
contextual,
ethical, logical,
social, and
cultural.
24 points
The deliverable
proposes a
limited solution
that addresses
few of the
following
dimensions of
the problem:
contextual,
ethical, logical,
social, and
cultural.
21 points
The deliverable
does not
adequately
propose a
solution to the
problem.
1/30/22, 3:00 AM Preview Rubric: Step 3 Task Force Plan Proposal (85 Points) - 3WI2022 Vir Ldrshp Global Based Teams (BADM-703-01B) - Indiana Wesleyan…
https://brightspace.indwes.edu/d2l/lp/rubrics/preview.d2l?ou=157107&rubricId=482276&originTool=quicklinks 2/3Total
Criteria Excellent Competent Needs Improvement
Inadequate/Faili ng
Criterion Score
Teamwork / 25
Written
Communicatio
n
/ 15
25 points
Teammates
interact well by
offering their
own
understanding
and perspectives,
asking questions
about ideas,
sharing
responsibility,
and contributing
equally.
Teammates
demonstrate
effective
interpersonal
communication
and engage in
resolving
conflicts
together.
23 points
Teammates
interact to
adequately meet
expectations.
20 points
Teammates
attempt to work
with each other,
but demonstrate
limited
interaction or an
imbalance of
responsibility
that impedes
collaboration.
18 points
Teammates do
not communicate
well and/or
follow through
on individual
responsibilities
to achieve team
goals.
15 points
The deliverable is
presented
professionally
and is easy to
read and
understand. It
demonstrates
the effective
control of
grammar and
spelling.
In-text citations
and references
are correctly
formatted using
APA.
13 points
The deliverable is
presented
professionally
and is readable.
It demonstrates
the basic control
of grammar and
spelling, with
only minimal
errors.
In-text citations
and references
are correctly
formatted using
APA.
12 points
The deliverable is
lacking in
professional
presentation. At
times it is
difficult to read
or understand
due to issues
with grammar
and spelling.
In-text citations
and references
are attempted,
but incorrectly
formatted.
10 points
The deliverable
is not
professional. It is
difficult to read
or understand
due to many
issues with
grammar and
spelling.
No in-text
citations or
references are
appropriately
used.
1/30/22, 3:00 AM Preview Rubric: Step 3 Task Force Plan Proposal (85 Points) - 3WI2022 Vir Ldrshp Global Based Teams (BADM-703-01B) - Indiana Wesleyan…
https://brightspace.indwes.edu/d2l/lp/rubrics/preview.d2l?ou=157107&rubricId=482276&originTool=quicklinks 3/3
Total / 85
Overall Score
Excellent 78 points minimum
Competent 69 points minimum
Needs Improvement 61 points minimum
Inadequate/Failing 0 points minimum