Discussion: In God We Trust, All Others Bring Data

5/21/22, 7:45 PM Preview Rubric: 1.1 Discussion (25 Points) - 3SU2022 Data Analytics & Research (BADM-707-01B) - Indiana Wesleyan University

https://brightspace.indwes.edu/d2l/lp/rubrics/preview.d2l?ou=165060&rubricId=518393&originTool=quicklinks 1/3

1.1 Discussion (25 Points) Course: 3SU2022 Data Analytics & Research (BADM-707-01B)

Criteria Excellent Competent Needs Improvement

Inadequate/Faili ng

Criterion Score

Question No.

1 & 2

/ 8

Question No.

3 & 4

/ 8

8 points

Demonstrated

clear, insightful

critical thinking

discussing a

decision

informed by

bad data.

7 points

(6-7 points)

Demonstrated

competent

critical thinking

discussing a

decision

informed by

bad data.

5 points

(4-5 points)

Demonstrated

limited critical

thinking in

discussing a

decision

informed by

bad data.

0 points

(0-3 points)

Demonstrated

little to no

critical thinking

in discussing

discussing a

decision

informed by

bad data.

8 points

Demonstrated

clear, insightful

critical thinking

discussing why

bad data was

used and how

good data

might have

been obtained.

7 points

(6-7 points)

Demonstrated

competent

critical thinking

discussing why

bad data was

used and how

good data

might have

been obtained.

5 points

(4-5 points)

Demonstrated

limited critical

thinking in

discussing why

bad data was

used and how

good data

might have

been obtained.

0 points

(0-3 points)

Demonstrated

little to no

critical thinking

discussing why

bad data was

used and how

good data

might have

been obtained.

5/21/22, 7:45 PM Preview Rubric: 1.1 Discussion (25 Points) - 3SU2022 Data Analytics & Research (BADM-707-01B) - Indiana Wesleyan University

https://brightspace.indwes.edu/d2l/lp/rubrics/preview.d2l?ou=165060&rubricId=518393&originTool=quicklinks 2/3

Criteria Excellent Competent Needs Improvement

Inadequate/Faili ng

Criterion Score

Response to

Classmates

/ 66 points

Demonstrated

clear, insightful

critical analysis

of one's

classmates’

postings in

determining

the logic of

their

arguments, the

correctness of

their facts, the

reasonableness

of their

interpretations

and

consistency

with the

substance and

intent of their

references.

5 points

(4-5 points)

Demonstrated

competent

critical analysis

of one's

classmates’

postings in

determining

the logic of

their

arguments, the

correctness of

their facts, the

reasonableness

of their

interpretations

and

consistency

with the

substance and

intent of their

references.

3 points

(2-3 points)

Demonstrated

limited critical

analysis of

one's

classmates’

postings in

determining

the logic of

their

arguments, the

correctness of

their facts, the

reasonableness

of their

interpretations

and

consistency

with the

substance and

intent of their

references.

1 point

(0-1 point)

Demonstrated

little to no

critical analysis

of one's

classmates’

postings in

determining

the logic of

their

arguments, the

correctness of

their facts, the

reasonableness

of their

interpretations

and

consistency

with the

substance and

intent of their

references.

5/21/22, 7:45 PM Preview Rubric: 1.1 Discussion (25 Points) - 3SU2022 Data Analytics & Research (BADM-707-01B) - Indiana Wesleyan University

https://brightspace.indwes.edu/d2l/lp/rubrics/preview.d2l?ou=165060&rubricId=518393&originTool=quicklinks 3/3

Total / 25

Overall Score

Criteria Excellent Competent Needs Improvement

Inadequate/Faili ng

Criterion Score

Grammar,

Spelling,

Length, and

Citation

/ 33 points

Sentence

structure is

complete with

correct

spelling,

punctuation,

capitalization,

varied diction,

and word

choices.

Assignment

length is

correct with

sources

correctly cited.

2 points

Sentence

structure has

minor errors

(fragments,

run-ons) with

correct

spelling,

punctuation,

capitalization,

and limited

diction and

word choices.

Assignment

length is

correct with

sources

correctly cited.

1 point

Sentence

structure has

several errors

in sentence

fluency with

multiple

fragments/run-

ons; poor

spelling,

punctuation,

and/or word

choice.

Assignment

length is

inappropriate

with several

format and

citation errors.

0 points

Sentence

structure has

serious and

persistent

errors in

sentence

fluency,

sentence

structure,

spelling,

punctuation,

and/or word

choice.

Assignment

length is

inappropriate

with several

format and

citation errors

or sources not

cited.

Excellent 23 points minimum

Competent 21 points minimum

Needs Improvement 18 points minimum

Inadequate/Failing 0 points minimum