Country Presentation(INDIA)

Online Presentation Rubric

Criteria Unsatisfactory-Beginning Developing Accomplished Exemplary Total

Content

0-34 points 35-39 points 40-44 points 45-50 points

/50

Presentation content shows a lack of understanding of the topic. There is inadequate evidence of research and insufficient relevant information and facts. Content is confusing and/or contains frequent inaccuracies. Required elements are missing and/or randomly organized.

Presentation content shows general understanding of the topic. There is limited evidence of research in locating relevant information and facts and/or supporting statements made. Content contains some inaccuracies, inconsistencies, misinterpretations, and/or somewhat unclear. A required element may be missing,

Presentation content shows an adequate understanding of the topic. Some research effort is evident in locating relevant information and facts. Content is mostly accurate and reasonably organized. May contain some inconsistencies in content or some connections made may not be supported. Required elements are included.

Presentation content shows a thorough understanding of the topic. Substantive research effort is evident in locating relevant information and facts. Content is accurate and sequenced in a clear, logical way. All required elements are included.

Design

0-13 points 14-15 points 16-17 points 18-20 points

/20

Slides generally lack visual appeal and are text-heavy with little or no visuals and/or exhibit an overuse of color or animations. Media, (e.g., images), if used, are rarely cited on each slide. No theme is evident and the presentation appears disjointed rather than unified and/or frequent errors (grammar, punctuation, spelling, formatting, etc.) on the slides

Slides generally include a mix of white space, visuals, and/or text but not consistently and/or some overuse or inappropriate use of color or animations. Theme (e.g., template) is not consistently evident throughout the presentation and/or some errors (grammar, punctuation, spelling, formatting, etc.) on the slides.

Slides are effectively designed with visual appeal including white space, visuals, and minimal text for the most part. Color and animations are used appropriately. Theme (e.g., template) is evident in the presentation for the most part to produce a cohesive presentation and/or minor errors (grammar, punctuation, spelling, formatting, etc.) on the slides.

Slides are visually well designed, aesthetically pleasing with appropriate use of white space, visuals, and minimal text, on each slide. Color and animations are used judiciously. Theme (e.g., template) is evident throughout to produce a highly cohesive presentation. Basically free from errors (grammar, punctuation, spelling, formatting, etc.) on the slides.

Writing Mechanics

0-6 points 7 points 8 points 9 -10 points

/10

Errors in spelling, capitalization, punctuation, usage and grammar repeatedly distract the reader, and major editing and revision is required.

Spelling, punctuation, and grammar errors distract or impair readability.

The text is clearly written with little or no editing required for grammar, punctuation, and spelling.

The text is written with no errors in grammar, capitalization, punctuation, and spelling.

Online Presentation Rubric

Criteria Unsatisfactory-Beginning Developing Accomplished Exemplary Total

Presentation/ Notes/

Transcript

0-6 points 7 points 8 points 9-10 points

/10

Presentation lacks “Notes” on slides (or in a separate document) to explain each slide and/or, if included, the notes repeat the text provided on the slide. Writing demonstrates a below average/poor writing style with frequent errors in spelling, grammar, punctuation, and/or usage.

Minimal “Notes” are included in the presentation slides (or in a separate document) and/or are sporadically provided. Writing demonstrates an average writing style with some errors in spelling, grammar, punctuation, and/or usage.

“Notes” are included in the presentation (or in a separate document) for the most part to explain slides as a written transcript. Writing demonstrates an above average writing style with little grammar, punctuation, spelling, and or usage errors.

“Notes” are included in the presentation (or in a separate document) to fully explain each slide as a written transcript. Writing demonstrates a strong writing style basically free from grammar, punctuation, spelling, or usage errors.

Works Cited

0-6 points 7 points 8 points 9-10 points

/10

None or if included, generally lack proper citation format (APA 6th ed.).

An attempt at a bibliography that may contain errors in formatting or improperly cited (APA 6th ed.).

A well-developed bibliography that contains little to no errors but successfully cites all sources (APA 6th ed.).

A complete and accurate bibliography that is useful in directing the audience to cited sources (APA 6th ed.).

TOTAL POINTS (sum of 6 Criteria) /100