Reflection Report: Best Practice of BPI case study

Category

Scoring Criteria

Points

Score

Organisation

(15 points)

The type of presentation is appropriate for the topic and audience.

5

3.5

Information is presented in a logical sequence.

5

4

Presentation appropriately cites requisite number of references.

5

5

Content

(50 points)

Introduction is attention-getting, lays out the problem well, and establishes a framework for the rest of the presentation.

5

4

Technical terms are well-defined in language appropriate for the target audience, eg mapping, processes etc

10

6

Material included is relevant to the case study and reflect to the BPI theories

15

13

Critical analysis included on the selected case study; lesson learnt recorded

15

10

There is an obvious conclusion summarizing the presentation.

5

4

Presentation

(35 points)

Speaker maintains good eye contact with the audience and is appropriately animated (e.g., gestures, moving around, etc.).

5

5

Speaker uses a clear, audible voice. Delivery is poised, controlled, and smooth.

10

7.5

Good language skills and pronunciation are used.

5

4

Visual aids are well-prepared, informative, effective, and not distracting.

10

8.5

Length of presentation is within the assigned time limits.

5

3

Total Points

100

77.5

Feedback and Commentary

Presentation content and sources was nicely listed. Voice and pronunciation were clear as well. But the length of the presentation was over the allotted time.

Assessor Name/Group: Group 4 - Rikesh Rajkarnikar and Som Bahadur Gurung