Reflection Report: Best Practice of BPI case study

profilerupali
Presentationmarkingsheet6009fromGroup10Rama.doc

PROJ6009 T1, 2020 Assessment 2A Marking And Feedback Form

Presenter / Group: Daljeet & Rupali /Group 6 Date: 8/04/2020

Category

Scoring Criteria

Points

Score

Organisation

(15 points)

The type of presentation is appropriate for the topic and audience.

5

3

Information is presented in a logical sequence.

5

4

Presentation appropriately cites requisite number of references.

5

4

Content

(50 points)

Introduction is attention-getting, lays out the problem well, and establishes a framework for the rest of the presentation.

5

2

Technical terms are well-defined in language appropriate for the target audience, e.g.: - mapping, processes etc.

10

5

Material included is relevant to the case study and reflect to the BPI theories

15

7

Critical analysis included on the selected case study; lesson learnt recorded

15

8

There is an obvious conclusion summarizing the presentation.

5

4

Presentation

(35 points)

Speaker maintains good eye contact with the audience and is appropriately animated (e.g., gestures, moving around, etc.).

5

3

Speaker uses a clear, audible voice. Delivery is poised, controlled, and smooth.

10

8

Good language skills and pronunciation are used.

5

4

Visual aids are well-prepared, informative, effective, and not distracting.

10

3

Length of presentation is within the assigned time limits.

5

2

Total Points

100

57

Feedback and Commentary

The coordination was good among team members. There were very long sentences in the slides and one member was reading the whole lines, less or no graphics so slide was bit monotonous.

Assessor Name/Group: Rama, Roshit & Umesh/ Group 10