Reflection Report: Best Practice of BPI case study

Category

Scoring Criteria

Points

Score

Organization

(15 points)

The type of presentation is appropriate for the topic and audience.

5

2.5

Information is presented in a logical sequence.

5

3

Presentation appropriately cites requisite number of references.

5

4

Content

(50 points)

Introduction is attention-getting, lays out the problem well, and establishes a framework for the rest of the presentation.

5

3

Technical terms are well-defined in language appropriate for the target audience, eg mapping, processes etc

10

2

Material included is relevant to the case study and reflect to the BPI theories

15

9

Critical analysis included on the selected case study, lesson learnt recorded

15

8

There is an obvious conclusion summarizing the presentation.

5

2.5

Presentation

(35 points)

Speaker maintains good eye contact with the audience and is appropriately animated (e.g., gestures, moving around, etc.).

5

4

Speaker uses a clear, audible voice. Delivery is poised, controlled, and smooth.

10

3

Good language skills and pronunciation are used.

5

2

Visual aids are well-prepared, informative, effective, and not distracting.

10

7

Length of presentation is within the assigned time limits.

5

0

Total Points

100

Feedback and Commentary

Speakers could be clearer in term of the presentation and definitely more concise.

The was an issue with the flow of the presentation and could be my organized.

The Passover from one presenter to another kept happening and this would be better if they did it from the first half by one and then the next half by one.

Also while presenting engagement was lacking but I can give them the benefit since its pretty difficult to engage audiences through the online format.

Good Presentation could be much better as both the presenters had a good understanding of the subject matter being presented.

Assessor Name/Group: 8