DUE 7/4/2023.....PLEASE FOLLOW ALL INSTRUCTIONS....NO PLAGARISM

ALL the points

Half of points

0 points

Definition of the disease

Epidemiology and causes

10%

Comprehensive review

Reviewed vaguely

Not addressed

Pathophysiology

clinical presentation objective ad subjective

Include the hallmark of the disease

10%

Only two of the requirements discussed

Only one of the requirements discussed

None discussed

Physical examination and maneuvers

5%

All addressed

Very vague

Not addressed

Diagnostic test

Include diagnosis Gold Standard

5%

All addressed

Addressed but not evidenced-based

Wrong test

Differential diagnosis

Diagnostic reasoning

20%

Differential diagnosis and diagnostic reasoning (confirming the dx)

Only one requirement addressed

None

Management

Pharmacological and non-pharmacological treatments and Plans for Adult and Geriatric Populations

The first line, second line, and non-pharmacological treatments

15%

The first line, second line, and non-pharmacological addressed

Only 2 of the requirements provided

None or only one provided

Health promotion plan /Health maintenance

recommended screening, vaccines test, etc.

Utilizing the U.S. Task Force USPTF

Screening Guidelines

CDC and other guidelines such as the American Cancer Society

10%

All addressed

Partially

Not discussed

Follow-up and referrals

2%

All addressed

Partially

Not discussed

Healthy People 2030 Goal Review

3%

Complete with info on current goal and progress

Incomplete info provided

Not addressed

References

Clear writing

references listed APA, five recent peer-reviewed journal articles

See below

At least 5 EBP references. < 5 years with the most current guidelines of treatment

3-4 EBP references

Less than 3 EBP references

Presentation see below grading criteria

20%

Class Presentation Rubric

Excellent

Very good

Satisfactory

Needs Improvement

10 points

5 points

2-4 points

0 points

Quality of class presentation

The presentation demonstrated evidence-based practice, critical thinking regarding the case, and current and well-referenced supporting material.

Engages peers in discussion and answers questions well.

The presentation demonstrated some evidence-based practice, critical thinking about the case, and some current and well-referenced supporting material.

Somewhat engages peers in discussion and answers questions well.

Presentation weakly demonstrated evidence-based practice, critical thinking about the case, and current and weakly referenced supporting material.

Weakly engages peers in discussion and answers questions.

The presentation did not demonstrate evidence-based practice; critical thinking about the case and current and referenced supporting material was not provided.

Does not engage peers in discussion and does not answer questions well.