case study

profilerawls25
Presentation1.pptx

Name: Case Study Grading Rubric

Description: 1/2 page=14 lines

Grid View

List View

Name:Case Study Grading Rubric

Description:1/2 page=14 lines

  Novice Competent Proficient
APA and Learning Task Requirements Each question answered with at least ½ page response that is double-spaced•Correct citation format for direct quote for question 4•Correct reference format for the textbook Points Range:0 (0.00%) - 3.2 (3.20%) The questions were not answered with at least ½ page response that is double-spaced. Incorrect citation format for direct quote and incorrect format for book reference. Points Range:3.3 (3.30%) - 6.6 (6.60%) Most questions were answered with at least ½ page that is double-spaced. The citation format for direct quote and the book reference was formatted correctly for the most part. Points Range:6.7 (6.70%) - 10 (10.00%) Each question was answered with at least ½ page that is double-spaced. The correct citation format for direct quote was used, and the correct reference format for a book reference was used.
Content/Information The following questions are addressed in the case study:•Noted ethical dilemmas)•Applicable ethical codes•Reaction to ethical scenario•Direct quote from textbook Points Range:0 (0.00%) - 25.6 (25.60%) The provided information noted in column 1 isnot necessary and sufficient enough toprovide an accurate reflection of the understanding of each element for the ethical case study. Points Range:26.4 (26.40%) - 52.8 (52.80%) The provided information noted in column 1 is necessary and sufficient enough for the most part to provide an accurate reflection of the understanding of each element for the ethical case study. Points Range:53.6 (53.60%) - 80 (80.00%) The provided information noted in column 1 is necessary and sufficient enough to provide an accurate reflection of the understanding of each element for the ethical case study.
Quality of Writing Clarity of sentences and paragraphs•No errors in spelling, grammar or use of English •Organization and coherence of ideas Points Range:0 (0.00%) - 3.2 (3.20%) The paper is not well written and contains many spelling errors, and/or grammar errors and/or use of English errors. The paper is poorly organized, lacks clarity and/or does not present ideas in a coherent way. Points Range:3.3 (3.30%) - 6.6 (6.60%) The paper is well written, for themost part, without spelling, grammar or use of English errors. The paper is, for the most part, well organized, clear and presents ideas in a coherent way. Points Range:6.7 (6.70%) - 10 (10.00%) The paper is well written from start to finish, without spelling, grammar or use of English errors. The paper is well organized, clear and presents ideas in a coherent way.