Premarital Curriculum Project DRAFT
Premarital Counseling Curriculum (Final) 150 points
|
Criteria |
Levels of Achievement |
||||
|
|
Advanced |
Proficient |
Developing |
||
|
Element |
Excellent: Satisfies criteria w/ excellent work |
Good: Satisfies criteria |
Average: Satisfies most criteria |
Poor: Does not satisfy criteria |
Not Present |
|
Content 70% (105 pts.) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Introduction (30 pts) |
28 to 30 pts. Relevant and current statistics for marriage in chosen community are included. Home church’s/community’s stance on premarital counseling articulated. Personal philosophy supporting your curriculum development clarified. Introduction is clear, with a “hook” that provides a clear and compelling rationale for engaging in the curriculum |
26 to 27 pts. Some statistics for marriage are included. Introduction provides a rationale for participating in the curriculum. Required information (church’s stance and personal philosophy) are articulated. |
23 to 25 pts. Introduction is present, but weak. Some information is missing. Little attempt to “hook” potential participants. |
1 to 22 pts. Minimal attempt to engage audience with introductory information. Statistics are incorrect, not substantiated. Information is not adequately provided. |
0 pts. No introduction present. |
|
Curriculum - Content (50 pts) |
46 to 50 pts Content is relevant. Key premarital issues are addressed by the curriculum. Curriculum includes biblical support and guidance Curriculum includes adequate research support (minimum of 5 sources cited) Curriculum proceeds logically. |
42 to 45 pts. Content is relevant with minimal gaps in premarital issues present. An attempt to include biblical support and guidance is evident. At least five sources are cited. |
38 to 41 pts. Content is minimally relevant to the topic. Minimal attempt to include biblical support and guidance. Consistent errors/missing content. Fewer than 5 sources are cited. Topics lack focus in presentation. |
1 to 37 pts. Content is not relevant or includes inaccuracies. No biblical support or guidance is provided. Topics poorly organized. |
0 pts. Not present |
|
Curriculum – Sufficient (25 pts) |
23 to 25 pts. Powerpoint includes content (at least title slides) sufficient to provide 8 to 12 weeks of material. Weekly topics are clearly articulated. Overview of content provided (summary) |
21 to 22 pts. Powerpoint content minimally covers 8 to 12 weeks’ worth of content. Weekly topics are articulated. |
19 to 20 pts. Powerpoint content is confusing/lacks focus and clarity. No summary is provided. |
1 to 18 pts. Powerpoint content is insufficient and poorly articulated. Content is not robust enough. No summary is provided. |
0 pts. Not present |
|
Structure 30% (45 pts.) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Powerpoint Presentation (30 pts) |
28 to 30 pts. Slides are clear, concise, not overloaded with words, message is clearly conveyed. Slides are visually appealing and interest audience. |
26 to 27 pts. Slides convey knowledge well, but could be more concise or neat. Slides do not excite interest. |
23 to 25 pts. Slides include too much information that overwhelms the audience. |
1 to 22 pts. Slides are distracting and do not clearly convey the information intended. |
0 pts. Not present |
|
Grammar, spelling, APA citation (if applicable) (15 pts) |
14 to 15 pts. Spelling and grammar are correct. Assignment is typographically correct. Citations and references cited in current APA or Turabian format.
|
13 pts.
Some spelling or grammatical errors. Some typographical errors. Citations are “mostly” in current APA or Turabian format. |
12 pts. Spelling and grammar errors distract. Typographical errors distract from content. References are minimally cited in current APA or Turabian format.
|
1 to 11 pts. Spelling, grammar, and/or typographical errors distract. References are not cited in current APA or Turabian format. . |
0 pts. Not present |