|
Criteria
|
Levels of Achievement
|
|
Content
(70%)
|
Advanced
92-100%
|
Proficient
84-91%
|
Developing
1-83%
|
Not present
|
Total
|
|
Content
|
27.5 to 30 points
The student articulately evaluates the Christian’s role in ethical research. The student integrates course readings, outside readings, course presentations, and experience into the synthesis on ethical research.
|
25.5 to 27 points
For the most part, the student evaluates the Christian’s role in ethical research. The student integrates course readings, outside readings, course presentations, and experience into the synthesis on ethical research.
|
1 to 25 points
The student attempts to discuss the ethics and the role of the Christian, but does so without articulating information presented in the course. The student does not fully address the concepts/questions presented in the assignment instructions.
|
0 points
Not present
|
|
|
Biblical Integration
|
27.5 to 30 points
The student uses Scripture to undergird his or her conclusions about the Christian’s role in ethical research. The student applies, articulately synthesizes, and explains how Scripture should form the framework for a Christian researcher.
|
25.5 to 27 points
The student uses Scripture to undergird his or her conclusions about the Christian’s role in ethical research. The student applies, for the most part, Scripture as a framework for the Christian researcher.
|
1 to 25 points
The student makes a concerted effort to describe Scripture passages in an attempt to show the relationship between the Bible and ethical research; however, the paper lacks strength based on the analysis or passages used.
|
0 points
Not present
|
|
|
Sources
|
9.25 to 10 points
Paper includes 3–5 sources These 3–5 sources must include course materials, Scripture, and at least one outside scholarly source.
|
8.5 to 9 points
Paper includes 2 sources. One or more of the following categories of sources is missing: course materials, Scripture, and at least one outside scholarly source.
|
1 to 8 points
Paper includes only 1source or sources used do not include sources from any of the required categories: course materials, Scripture, and outside scholarly sources.
|
0 points
Not present
|
|
|
Structure (30%)
|
Advanced
92-100%
|
Proficient
84-91%
|
Developing
1-83%
|
Not present
|
Total
|
|
Grammar and Spelling
|
13.5 to 15 points
No grammatical or spelling errors
|
12.5 to 13 points
Some errors, but not distracting from the appearance and presentation of ideas.
|
1 to 12 points
Significant errors such that the professionalism and appearance of the paper are significantly undermined.
|
0 points
Not present
|
|
|
Formatting
|
9.25 to 10 points
· The analysis meets the formatting requirements set forth in the assignment instructions.
· Assignment adheres to current Turabian guidelines.
· Citations are formatted correctly.
· Sectional headings are used.
|
8.5 to 9 points
· The analysis meets some, but not all of the formatting requirements set forth in the assignment instructions.
· Assignment mostly adheres to current Turabian guidelines.
· Sectional headings are used.
|
1 to 8 points
· The analysis does not follow the assignment instructions.
· Essay is not formatted according to Turabian formatting.
· Sectional headings are not used.
|
0 points
Not present
|
|
|
Word Count
|
4.5 to 5 points
Paper meets the required word count; 1000–1250 words
|
4.25 to 4.25 points
Paper is 100 words over or under the required word count.
|
1 to 4 points
Paper is more than 100 words over or under the required word count.
|
0 points
Not present
|
|
|
Professor Comments:
|
|
Total:
|
|
Mz Genuine
PPOL505_Ethical_Analysis_Paper_Grading_Rubric.docx
0
