Scholarly PP
1
RUBRIC
• Integration of Knowledge as it applies to the Topic 30% of total result ExcellentThe PP presentation demonstrates that the author understands and has applied concepts learned in the course. The presentation answers inform peers/colleagues on a health problem that is prevalent within your selected group and demonstrate your research of health promotion strategies for addressing this specific health problem.. Concepts are integrated into the writer’s own insights. The writer provides concluding remarks that show analysis and synthesis of ideas. 30 SatisfactoryThe PP presentation demonstrates that the author, mostly, understands and has applied concepts learned in the course. Some conclusions, however, are not supported in the body of the presentation as the author tries to inform peers/colleagues about a health problem that is prevalent within the selected group and demonstrate the research of health promotion strategies for addressing this specific health problem. 24 UnsatisfactoryThe PP presentation demonstrates that the author, to a certain extent, understands and has applied concepts learned in the course; however there are significant gaps in answering “inform
2
peers/colleagues about a health problem that is prevalent within the selected group and demonstrate the research of health promotion strategies for addressing this specific health problem. 18 UnacceptableThe PP presentation does not demonstrate that the author has understood, and applied concepts learned in the course. No connection to “inform peers/colleagues about a health problem that is prevalent within the selected group and demonstrate the research of health promotion strategies for addressing this specific health problem is made in the presentation. 12
• Depth of Discussion and Cohesiveness 20% of total result ExcellentIn-depth discussion and elaboration of the topic in all sections of the presentation. Ties together information from all sources. Presentation flows from one issue to the next with no headings. The author’s writing demonstrates an understanding of the relationship among material obtained from all sources Author ties together information from all sources. 20 SatisfactoryIn-depth discussion and elaboration the topic in most sections of the presentation. Mostly, it ties together information from
3
all sources. Presentation flows with only some disjointedness. The author’s writing demonstrates an understanding of the relationship among material obtained from all sources. 16 UnsatisfactoryThe writer has omitted content. Quotations from others outweigh the writer’s own ideas excessively. Sometimes ties together information from all sources. The presentation does not flow. Disjointedness is apparent. The author’s writing does not demonstrate an understanding of the relationship between material obtained from all sources. 12 UnacceptableCursory discussion in all the sections of the paper or brief discussion in only a few sections It does not tie together information. Presentation does not flow and appears to be created from disparate issues. Headings are necessary to link concepts. Writing does not demonstrate an understanding of any relationship 8
• PowerPoint Slides and Creativity 10% of total result ExcellentPowerPoint presentation was completed utilizing creativity and inclusive template. The slides are not overly crowded and do not appear to be a paper. No errors noted. The title is scholarly and the
4
development is that of a graduate level. The content is presented concisely. 10 SatisfactoryPowerPoint presentation was completed utilizing SOME creativity and inclusive template- there could have been more attention grabbing presentation tactics used. The slides are somewhat overly crowded. Some errors noted. The title is scholarly and the development is not fully at the graduate level. The content is presented disjointedly in places- there are issues with the flow of the presentation. 8 UnsatisfactoryPowerPoint presentation was lacks creativity and inclusive template. The slides are overly crowded. Some errors noted. The title is not scholarly and representative of the topic being discussed. Presentation is not developed at the graduate level. The content is presented disjointedly in places- there are several issues with the flow of the presentation. 6 UnacceptablePowerPoint presentation was lacks creativity and inclusive template. There is no development of content and only cursory explanations and development is noted. There is no flow and cohesion within the presentation. 4
5
• Sources 20% of total result Excellent8 current sources are used and are peer-review journal articles or scholarly books. Sources include both general background sources and specialized sources. Special-interest sources and popular literature and acknowledged as such if they are cited. All websites utilized are authoritative. All REFERENCES have DOI Numbers 20 SatisfactoryUsed at least 7 current sources, which are peer-review journal articles or scholarly books. All websites utilized are authoritative. 7 REFERENCES have DOI Numbers 16 UnsatisfactoryUsed at least 6 current sources which are peer- reviewed journal articles or scholarly books. All websites utilized are credible. 6 All REFERENCES have DOI Numbers 12 UnacceptableFewer than 6 current sources are used which are peer- reviewed journal articles or scholarly books. Not all websites utilized are credible, and/or sources are not current. Less than 6 All REFERENCES have DOI Numbers 8
6
• APA adherence and Citation in text in all Slides and Reference Slide 10% of total result ExcellentFewer than 5 incomplete citations and/or quotations, and APA format errors. Pictures and graphs are all referenced 10 SatisfactoryMore than 5 but fewer than 10 incomplete citations and/ or quotations, and APA format errors. at least 5 pictures, graphs, etc are not cited. 8 UnsatisfactoryMore than 10 incomplete citations and/or quotations, or APA format errors. 6 UnacceptableThe citation style is inconsistent or incorrect. It does not cite sources. The paper submitted is NOT in APA Format. 4
7
• PowerPoint Presentation Spelling and Grammar 10% of total result ExcellentFewer than 5 grammatical, spelling, capitalization, or punctuation errors The required word count has been met. 10 SatisfactoryMore than 5 but fewer than 10 grammatical, spelling, capitalization & punctuation errors The required word count is 25 words below the minimum required count. 8 UnsatisfactoryMore than 10 grammatical, spelling, capitalization & punctuation errors The required word count is 50 words below the minimum required count. 6 UnacceptableAn unacceptable number of spelling and/or grammar mistakes. The required word count is more than 50 words below the minimum required count. 4