Speech Language Pathology Research Project

Rubric for Research Presentation/Project

Student Names: _______________________________________________________________________________________________________

Paper/Project Title: ____________________________________________________________________________________________________

Criteria Exceeds expectations Meets expectations Needs improvement Does not meet requirements

Did not complete

Introduction (.5 point)

Introduction is well thought and related to topic. (.5)

Introduction is included and relates to the topic. (.35)

Introduction is not clearly related to the topic. (.25)

Introduction is irrelevant to the topic. (.15)

There is no introduction (0)

Review of literature (1 point)

Review of the literature is relevant to topic and at least half of the references are within the last 10 years. (1.0)

Review of the literature is relevant to the topic, however, less than half of the references are from the last 10years. (.75)

Review of the literature is partially relevant to topic and less than half of the references are from the last 10 years. (.5)

Review of the literature is irrelevant to topic and less than half of the references are from the last 10 years. (.25)

Review of the literature is irrelevant, outdated, and incomplete. (0)

Length (.5 point)

The length is 10 minutes. (.5) The length exceeded 10 minutes. (.35)

The length exceeded 15 minutes. (.25)

The length exceeded 20 minutes. (.15)

Length is less than ten minutes (0)

Discussion of therapeutic technique (1 point)

The therapy technique is clear and easy to understand and is able to be replicated in a clinical setting. (1.0)

The therapy technique discussion is present, however not easy to follow. (.75)

The therapy technique discussion is present, however, difficult to follow. (.5)

The therapy technique discussion is present, however unclear. (.25)

Therapy technique is not discussed. (0)

References (.5 point)

The presentation includes in- text citations as well as a reference section at the end of the document in APA style – 6th edition. All citations in text have corresponding reference. (.5)

The presentation includes in-text citations as well as a reference section at the end of the document that are not in APA style – 6th edition and/or citations in text do not have corresponding reference. (.35)

Failure to include in-text citations in the presentation. (.25)

Failure to include in-text citations or reference section at the end of the presentation. (.15)

No references and citations included. (0)

Handout (1 point)

Handout is provided that is well thought out, clear, and well written and is your original work (1.0)

Handout is provided, however, is somewhat unclear and is your original work. (.75)

Handout is provided, however, is unclear and is your original work. (.50)

Handout is irrelevant and is your original work. (25)

Handout is not your original work. (0)

Professionalism (.5 point)

The presenters appear professional in attire and are knowledgeable about subject matter. (.5)

The presenters appear professional in attire and are somewhat knowledgeable about subject matter. (.35)

The presenters appear professional in attire and are partially knowledgeable about subject matter. (.25)

The presenters do not appear professional in attire and are partially knowledgeable about subject matter. (.15)

The presenters do not appear professional in attire and are not knowledgeable about subject matter. 0

TOTAL: ______ / 5 Comments: